Community and Structure
Written by: Mohammad Fadel
Supplanting tribal and kinship ties with membership in the ummah had far-reaching consequences for the development of Islam. In the 8th century C.E., the community reached a consensus that it would be wrong to question the sincerity of another Muslim's belief. The fundamental reluctance to judge the rightness or authenticity of another's belief became an Islamic norm, serving to strengthen Islam's remarkable egalitarianism, and the all-inclusive character of the ummah, which anyone can join. Membership comes either by birth, or simply by sincerely confessing belief in the presence of Muslim witnesses that there is no god but God, and Muhammad is just one of God's messengers.
Preserving and protecting the unity of the ummah, whether defined regionally or nationally is an important concern for Muslims, and the community as a whole bears responsibility for this. According to some traditions concerning the Day of Judgment, souls will be collected in groups according to their ummahs, and will be judged according to the actions of the group before being judged according to their individual actions.
Rashidun Caliphate, 632-661
After Muhammad's death the early Muslims agreed that unity would best be protected by a single leader, called a caliph. Under the first four caliphs (the Rashidun) between 632 and 661 C.E., the Islamic empire was ruled by a consensually agreed upon caliph (though there was some dispute by those who later developed into the Shi'a), and the ummah was a political, social, and legal reality as well as a spiritual one. However, historians have argued that there has never existed an Islamic 'state' since this early period because the kingdoms that were created after Ali's assassination in 661 C.E. were Arab kingdoms, and not Islamic ones; they did not adhere to the teachings of Muhammad and the chosen caliphs were merely figureheads of religious authority. After the fall of the Abbasid Caliphate to Mongol invaders in 1258 C.E., the religiously-inspired notion of the ummah survived primarily as a powerful communal reality.
|The Caliphate, 622-750|
|Expansion under the Prophet Muhammad, 622–632|
|Expansion during the Rashidun Caliphs, 632–661|
|Expansion during the Umayyad Caliphate, 661–750|
Nineteenth-century European colonialism introduced a host of new issues to historically Islamic lands, including an intricate set of questions surrounding the relationship between national and religious identity. What was the proper relationship between citizenship in the civil societies of nations such as Egypt and Syria, and membership in the universal ummah? What place should religious minorities hold in majority Muslim states? What is the appropriate relationship between one's love of the ummah and one's pride in one's homeland (watan)? These and many more questions formed the agenda for a great deal of 19th- and 20th-century Muslim political thought.
1. What does it mean to be a part of the ummah?
2. Why is the term ummah interpreted in a variety of ways?
3. What control did caliphs have over the Muslim community?