Written by: Anna Akasoy
In 685, Mukhtar, an Arab, had started his rebellion in the name of Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya who, Mukhtar claimed, was the Mahdi. Ibn al-Hanafiyya dissociated himself from the revolt. It is noteworthy that though he was a son of Ali, his mother was not Fatima, but rather a slave. Unlike the men who became later the Shiite Imams, he was thus not a descendant of Muhammad, which indicates an early tendency to highlight Ali as an ancestor rather than Muhammad.
One of Mukhtar's slogans was vengeance for Husayn. He challenged not only the Umayyad caliph Abd Malik, who had only just succeeded to the throne, but also his strong rival Abdallah ibn al-Zubayr in Mecca, who claimed the caliphate for himself. Supporters of Mukhtar included the population of Kufa, who might have felt guilty for having denied Husayn their support, as well as non-Arab converts to Islam. In 687, the rebellion was suppressed by the troops of Ibn al-Zubayr. In the aftermath of these events and the death of Ibn al-Hanafiyya in 700, supporters of the Alids continued to pin their hopes on this elusive Mahdi, who, they claimed, was hiding in a cave only to return and fill the world with justice. In the following years similar stories were told about other leaders of rebellions. The belief in a redeemer hiding either in the material world or a remote metaphysical sphere became one of the most characteristic features of Shiism, although it is not key to the beliefs of many modern Shiites.
Mukhtar's rebellion also foreshadowed other events that were going to change the course of Islamic history on a larger scale. In the 740s the supporters of the Alids had high hopes when a coalition of opponents of the Umayyads removed them from the throne. The main force of this coalition had been based in Khorasan and was constituted by non-Arab converts to Islam and their descendants who challenged the privileges the Umayyads granted to Arab Muslims.
Hopes for a restoration of true Islam were connected with the Abbasid family. As members of the Hashimite branch of the Quraysh they were more closely related to Muhammad than the Umayyads, although not as closely as the Alids. As with Mukhtar's propaganda, the authority of leaders rested not only on genealogical grounds, but also had apocalyptic implications. Thus, the promises for just rule made by the Abbasids suggest that the name of the second Abbasid caliph, Mahdi, was an allusion to the apocalyptic figure.
Supporters of the Alids saw their hopes crushed when the Abbasids claimed the caliphate for themselves. Over the following three centuries, the Abbasid caliphs who owed their rise to power to proto-Shiite tendencies were ultimately to turn into the embodiment of Sunnism. One possible exception was the Abbasid caliph Mamun (reg. 813-833) who appointed the future eighth Imam, Ali Rida, as his successor. Ali Rida, however, died while Mamun was still alive. (The Iranian city of Mashhad originated from a shrine that marked the Imam's grave.) The caliph may have had Shiite leanings that also manifested themselves in a preference for the rationalist theological school, the Mutazila.
The Imams remained quietists (non-political) during the rule of the Abbasids, who sometimes imprisoned them. At that time, they were probably merely considered highly respected or even superior religious authorities. Only when the Shiite theory of the Imams developed more fully were they venerated as individuals with almost superhuman powers whose authority was passed down.
1. What is the Hidden Imam and how does this impact the development of Shiism?
2. In what ways does the Mahdi inspire Shiite thought?
3. What does it mean when Imams are called quietists?