Did Liberals Make James Holmes a Mass-Murderer?
All three of Mr. Nolan's Batman films, carry, at their heart, the messages that a life lived in service of others, a life lived seeking justice, is the highest and best life that can be imagined. Mr. Holmes did not choose the Batman films because he resonated with anything other than surface elements.
No, as Anthony Lane points out in the New Yorker, the use of Batman was convenient, not prevenient:
Whatever we learn of the Aurora murderer, whatever he may profess, and whatever the weaponry, body armor, and headgear that he may have sported, and however it seems like a creepy match for what is worn, by heroes and villains alike, in the Batman movies—despite all that, he was not driven by those movies to slaughter.
What we can say, for now, is simply this: he took advantage of those movies. He knew that "The Dark Knight Rises" was not just a film; that it had become, as the studios like to say, and as the press is only too happy to echo, a "movie event."
So Batman didn't cause this atrocity. My liberal church, preaching love, compassion, and self-sacrifice, didn't cause it. I don't have an alibi for my whereabouts all of Thursday and Friday, but I'm also pretty sure that I didn't cause it.
Mr. Jackson of the AFA went on to suggest that what we were seeing in Colorado was God's judgment on a society that rejects his tradition's teaching about morality and denies "the God of the Bible." I'm going to claim my liberalism proudly here and disagree with this strain of conservative Christianity entirely. This is just bad theology--and hateful, as well.
Whether or not you believe in punitive substitution/substitutionary atonement (the idea that Jesus had to die to propitiate God for the evil acts of humankind), the ultimate truth of that theology is that Jesus has completed it already. Even if you actually believe in an all-powerful deity so angry he demands blood and violence for human disobedience, you at least need to realize that that train has left the station.
Jesus does not need to die over and over again—nor does anyone else—to appease an angry God. As Augustine noted in On the Trinity 4.17, "By His death, that one most true sacrifice offered on our behalf, [Christ] purged, abolished and extinguished . . . whatever guilt we had."
Any suggestion that Mr. Holmes is God's agent to punish a wicked land is simply wicked.
We may never know why James Holmes opened fire in that crowded theater. He may never know why. But I am sure of one thing: I didn't cause it, and I don't think you did either, whoever you may happen to be.
Some men just want to watch the world burn.
Greg Garrett is (according to BBC Radio) one of America's leading voices on religion and culture. He is the author or co-author of over twenty books of fiction, theology, cultural criticism, and spiritual autobiography. His most recent books are The Prodigal, written with the legendary Brennan Manning, Entertaining Judgment: The Afterlife in Popular Imagination, and My Church Is Not Dying: Episcopalians in the 21st Century. A contributor to Patheos since 2010, Greg also writes for the Huffington Post, Salon.com, OnFaith, The Tablet, Reform, and other web and print publications in the US and UK.
You may also be interested in these stories:
- In the Name of YHWH? Reflections on 1 Samuel 17:1a, 4-11, 19-23, 32-39
- Denomination, Community, and Culture: A Conversation with Bishop Andy Doyle on the Episcopal Church, Part One
- The Spin Is In: Reflections on Clinton, Bush, David, and 2 Samuel 1:1, 17-27
- Stepping Bravely Into the Future: A Conversation with Bishop Andy Doyle on the Episcopal Church, Part Two