Coloradans Bow in Prayer for Shooting Victims is an odd, substanceless story that seems to exist only to provide work for magnetic domains on a hard drive somewhere. Maybe it’s a placeholder for the real story which is coming later.
Regardless, listen to this:
Voices and hands raised in prayer, Coloradans of many faiths and no faith are joining to remember the 12 killed in Friday’s mass shooting at a movie theater in Aurora.
Yeah? And, uh, where did this happen? When? Any guesses as to how many showed up? And can we source the statement about people of “no faith” being involved? My experience of atheists is that they might well attend a memorial ceremony, but they’d probably sit out those segments devoted to talking to Jesus.
Congregations sent up prayers for the survivors and the relatives of the dead. Churches sent out social-media appeals for neighbors who wanted to join in remembrance. Elderly churchgoers at an aging Presbyterian church within walking distance near shooting suspect James Holmes’ apartment joined in prayer, though none had ever met him.
Again, are there any DETAILS?? Not in this four paragraph next-best-thing-to-non-story which, happily for its author, includes a date — July 22 — but no byline.
The prayers came in different languages, but the message was the same — hope and faith in the face of tragedy.
Well that just seems like religious boilerplate bullshit. What languages? Where’s the evidence that makes this part of the story true? Sure, there was faith, but what was this “hope” being expressed?
It’s like the news is being replaced with aerogel. This piece LOOKS like a news story, but it contains almost no substance, no news content.
I see now the story WAS a placeholder, and that many of the details, including the byline, were fleshed out later. It does seem like an odd way to do it, though. I followed a link to the story from ABCNews.com’s own home page. Why post the sketchy story at all?
Doing it this way sort of tears the curtain off news writing, doesn’t it? I mean, you see this little pre-fabricated outline of a story, it doesn’t give you a lot of confidence that the writer is really interested in the details he (she in this case) will turn up. You know he’s going to write this predigested pap story, no investigation or open-mindedness or thought required.
By the way, the new first paragraph deletes mention of the “no faith” faction. Don’t want those messy atheists intruding into a tear-jerky story about prayer and gods and such.