Jesus & Buddha: Practicing Across Traditions, a review

I sat down over the weekend to watch (for a second time), this short documentary, joined by two fellow PhD students, one a Theravadin Buddhist, the other a Roman Catholic. At just 44 minutes in length, it is brief, but perhaps it is the perfect length for a high school or university class on Comparative Religions or a faith group to watch over tea and cookies. The film features three people who are intimately familiar with both traditions:

  1. Father Robert Kennedy, a Jesuit priest and Zen teacher;
  2. Chung Hyun Kyung, Professor of Ecumenical Theology and Interfaith Engagement at Union Theological Seminary and a Buddhist Dharma teacher; and
  3. Paul Knitter, Professor of Theology, World Religions and Culture at Union Theological Seminary.

And when I say ‘both traditions’ I must point out that a limitation of the documentary is that two people are/were Roman Catholic priests and all three are experienced in Zen/Soen Buddhism. As such, the Buddha you meet is the Buddha of Japan and Korea, while the Jesus you meet comes very much through the Roman Catholic tradition (while Chung Hyun Kyung is a Presbyterian, she does not express any ‘distinctively’ Presbyterian views that I/we noticed). That said, the documentary proves to be a welcome entrée into not only Buddhist-Christian dialogue, but also the discussion of the Ultimate or Absolute in general – a conversation that could go well beyond these two traditions.

YouTube Preview Image

One of my first questions to my friends was “is this too New Age-y?”  Both shook their heads. Despite needing to be brief and succinct, the discussions from all three of the people in the film were lucid, focused, and well grounded in tradition. Again, they are in the Zen tradition, so Theravadin and/or Tibetan conceptions of / problems with a Creator God are avoided. The Zen teachings conveyed simply suggested that the Ultimate (or absolute or salvation, etc) is not justoutside you, it is within, and it is within everyone.  The trick is ‘waking up’ to this, moving beyond your old/separate/egoic/deluded self. Christian teachings were presented to suggest a parallel:

“For through the Law I died to the Law, that I might live unto God. I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and delivered Himself up for me.” (Galatians 2:19-20).

“Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.” (Luke 17:21)

“Know you not that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?” (1 Corinthians 3:16)

Statements in these traditions require interpretation and discernment, but what these practitioners (and others) were able to do is use the teachings and practices of each tradition to more fully inform their own self-understanding and their own practice. Discussions about the problems that come up in trying to practice multiple traditions weren’t addressed, and, given the short time in the video, would have been difficult to give sufficient time to. It will be up to viewers to pick up on and discuss these and compare them with the convergences discussed in the video.

The DVD comes with a handy “Discussion Questions” insert and more can be downloaded at their website. I could see interested Muslims, Jews, Hindus and others also using it as a learning and discussion tool. For those still asking ‘why’ we should care about interfaith/comparative religious thought, the answer should be found in the world around you. You interact with people of different traditions all the time, and if you want greater understanding and perhaps for them to better understand you, these kinds of dialogues must take place. Not to be too political, but it should be obvious that a lack of cultural and religious understanding has been disastrous in our shared human history.

And not to be too anti-traditional, but  every living tradition and every living culture is an open one and is already a product of this kind of dialogue(early Buddhism is a dialogue between the Buddha and Brahmins, Jains, and others; Chan is a product of Buddhism meeting Taoism and Confucianism; Zen is a product of Chan meeting Shintoism; and yes, Western/Modern Buddhism is a product of all of this meeting with Christianity, science, etc.).  Christianity, too, has thrived on its ability to incorporate Platonism and the Stoics, and later Aristotle by way of Muslim philosophers.

As Max Müller said, “to know one religion is to know none.”

Annunciation

Even if I don’t see it again — nor ever feel it
I know it is — and that if once it hailed me
it ever does –

And so it is myself I want to turn in that direction
not as towards a place, but it was a tilting
within myself,

as one turns a mirror to flash the light to where
it isn’t — I was blinded like that — and swam
in what shone at me

only able to endure it by being no one and so
specifically myself I thought I’d die
from being loved like that.

– Marie Howe

* For other perspectives, see this one by Dhivan Thomas Jones at the Western Buddhist Review, and Robert A. Jonas at Contemplative-life.org.

Kumare: Hinduism, Buddhism, Yoga, and more

Kumaremovie.com

Kumare, aka Vikram Ghandhi, via kumaremovie.com.

Kumare, or Kumaré (or Kūmāré), is a movie about American spirituality on the fringe. However, the more we look into American spirituality, the more we see that the ‘fringe’ is growing. Fast. The old stalwarts of American religion: the Catholics and the Protestants, are increasingly disenfranchising their members, thus steering themselves into a future of ineffectual obscurity. Denying women’s rights, protecting child-molesters, blaming the deaths of children on homosexuality, the list could go on.

Institutionalized religions, for all the many wonderful benefits they provides their adherents in terms of community, moral structure and aspirations, and comfort in difficult times, are struggling with modernity.

Meanwhile, yoga and other “Eastern” practices and beliefs, along with self-help, self-realization, and pretty much everything else starting with “self” are on the rise.

Kumare, a film by Vikram Gandhi, follows the experiment of a man, disillusioned by the religion of his youth, Hinduism, in search of something real.

The opening sequence (after a quick scene from what would become the end of the film), brings us into Vikram’s youth, where he tells us that while most kids worshiped Hulk Hogan, he was exposed to a whole different set of heroes, those of Hindu mythology. One scene shows a white-robed Hindu holy-man shouting, “Religion is Life! And Life is Religion!” Meanwhile, Vikram wonders, “Maybe this was all just a bunch of nonsense someone made up a long time ago.” A third angle comes next, as Vikram reminisces about watching his grandmother doing her morning prayers – the sense of real peace that came over her as she did them. And finally, Vikram tells us that he studied religion in college, hoping for answers. But, of course, he only found more questions.

Within less than one minute in the movie we see four snapshots of religion:

  1. The shouting zealot
  2. The naive skeptic
  3. The devout practitioner, and
  4. The somewhat learned skeptic.

That doesn’t cover all of the angles of modern religion and spirituality, but it’s a good start.

So Vikram sets out to make a documentary about the people coming to America spreading aspects of the religion he had abandoned, specifically those tied up in the “yoga” movement. As shots of yogis, gurus, and one of our favorite lamas, pass by the screen, Vikram states, “These people insisted that they were somehow different from everyone else in some inexplicable way. But none of them seemed any different to me.”

He then asks several older learned men, “How do you know?” and receives a series of platitudes and evasive responses, the suggestion being, “you don’t.”

After a sample of India and its menagerie of Gurus, Vikram asks: “What if I could become a Guru? Wouldn’t that prove that anyone could be one?”

And so it begins, the creation of Kumare.

After some experimentation in New York and practice in India, Kumare was ready to face the world. Phoenix, Arizona was chosen as the spot to conduct the experiment. Arizona might seem a bit out-of-the-way, but per capita it probably holds the largest number of fringe groups, new religious movements, and folks like the Fundamentalist Mormons than any other place in America.

Off goes Kumare, with two female assistants, into the yoga studios of Arizona.

The rest of the story, the vast bulk of the movie, carries us through his growing “Kumare Movement.” We meet an even broader array of personalities: young and old, seasoned seekers, yogis, and the young and curious, a professor of sociology, each finding in Kumare something special… something.

Kumare’s whole philosophy at this time is that he is an illusion, a fake, and that they should find what they were looking for from within, as if he were merely a mirror. Of course the whole time, many of them simply nod and say, “yes Kumare, we’ll look within…”  (remember  ”The Life of Brian”?) A student relates at one point:

Kumare came along and said, “here’s the idea, I’ll help you to find whatever is inside of you, but you’re gonna have to teach yourself, and I can teach you how to teach yourself that, but I’m not be here, which is true of all teachers. They don’t stick around.

However, along the way, some of these people do change in a positive way. Whatever he was doing, it helped.

Meanwhile he visits other fringe groups, a secluded group and that seem to think they’re from a different planet and a “Law of Attraction” group, each of which has its similarities to the Kumare philosophy, but also some differences. The Law of Attraction folks are friendly, but come off as a bit shallow. The different planet group is deep, as in “off the deep end…” Kumare’s reaction to each reflects his sanity and the nature of his concern for a sort of authentic spirituality.

As his teaching with his core group of students progresses, Kumare continually emphasizes his students’ responsibility to find happiness and meaning in themselves and their own lives, not only in inward meditation, but in community. In one scene, Kumare and 14 others go out and help clear a plot of land of weeds. Kumare uses this as a teaching moment. The guru is found not in him, not within, but here, among friends in helping one another, applying “the best of ourselves out in the world.”

Thus builds the climax of the film: Kumare’s “unveiling.” 

While the film has had its touching moments, and plenty of funny ones, this is where it becomes most gripping. Kumare’s whole philosophy has been that he is an illusion, an unnecessary reflection of the goodness within his students. Yet, just as in pretty much any religious context, the students have projected  a certain degree of holiness, otherness, and specialness upon him and then take some pleasure or joy in their relationship with that special otherness. If he not only tells them that he is not special, but actually shows them, what will they do?

If you haven’t seen it, do so before discussing the ‘ethics’ of Vikram Gandhi’s actions. In a way he does deceive his students: he wears cloths that identify him as someone he is not. He grows out his hair and beard to resemble an Indian holy man, which he is not. He changes his accent to sound like his grandmother.

But it’s far more interesting to think about just how all of this works. Why do these clothes, this appearance, etc have the effects they do today? Why do people, often well educated, thoughtful people, get sucked in – not only to Kumare’s group, but to more mainstream exotic religions on the one hand and potentially dangerous cults on the other?  

If you allow questions like this to accompany your viewing of the movie, looking at how many of these people are just like you and me, instead of starting off as seeing them as fundamentally different, then I think you will enjoy this movie as much as I did. The movie isn’t about American Buddhism, but if you know many American Buddhists, you will see them, along with their questions, motivations, and experiences, reflected in the people in this movie.

YouTube Preview Image

Have a look: http://kumaremovie.com/ – and let me know what you think.

 

Free book from H.H. the Dalai Lama

Beyond Religion EbookYes. For another week or so, you can get a free download of the Dalai Lama’s latest book, read by Martin Sheen, “Beyond Religion: Ethics for a Whole World.”

I’ve been listening to the first part of it over the last couple days and all I can say is, “wow, did the Dalai Lama read Kant?” Ethics going beyond religion? Based on some more fundamental aspect of humanity that makes us all perfectly equal? Huh? Yea, it’s good.

Even better than the free audio book, I’ll have a physical copy to give away on this blog next month.

In the mean time, I have some traveling to do: 22 hours worth to reach my big sis in Denver, a few days there, and then a 13+ hour drive in her mini cooper to Montana. Ahh, the great wide open spaces of the American West. Sigh. If you believe in prayer, please help us pray that we don’t get hit with a blizzard in Wyoming. Oh joy.

Review of A Force of Nature

In 1.5 of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle observes that there are three types of life thought to be happy: the life of enjoyment, the political life, and the life of contemplation.  The life of enjoyment is a hedonistic life focused on conventional pleasures. The political life is the life of a states- person. It may aim at despotic power, or be lived for the sake of winning public honors, but in its most proper form its aim is the exercise of moral virtue and political and practical wisdom in the governing of the state. The contemplative life, speaking generally, is the life of the philosopher or student of nature.

- Christine Korsgaard, Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Moral Value in Ethics, 96.3, 1986, p.489, emphasis mine.

I have just watched one of the most impressive movies of my life. A Force of Nature, the David Suzuki Movie, is deeply moving, brilliant, human, and urgent. Suzuki looks back on a life that tells so many stories and connects with every corner of the world.  This 90 minute film skilfully compresses 75 years of a magnificent life and does more than simply tell a story or convey sound-bytes. It takes us along on a journey, and, like the mythical “Heroes Quest” it is a journey that cannot help but leave us changed forever.

We see David Takayoshi Suzuki’s Canadian youth shattered by the events at Pearl Harbor and his experiencing discrimination for the first time at the hands of Japanese kids during his family’s internment. He speaks of turning to nature for refuge and solace, finding a home in science and in an American institution which had helped develop the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He starts a family, returning to Canada as an ambitious academic and being divorced by his wife. And in his young adulthood he lives through the 60s and 70s, becoming ever more aware of the destruction wrought by humanity all around him. At one point he admits that he was nearly paralyzed by the realization that his work in genetics, his science, could be used by militaries to wipe out whole races of people.

But he pressed on, transforming his understanding into activism through education. He started a TV show, “The Nature of Things,” to explain and relate the complexities of nature and science with passion to the common person. Through the show he met others who cared deeply for the environment, the most striking of whom were the Haida aboriginal people of British Columbia, who were fighting to save a large section of sacred land from impinging lumber companies.

They won that battle. But the war goes on.

Speaking about the engine driving this war, the economy, Suzuki states that in our rush for progress, “We fail to ask the important question. Like, ‘how much is enough? Are there no limits? Are we happier with all this stuff? What is an economy for? We never ask those questions.’”

YouTube Preview Image

It’s funny that virtually none of this film is explicitly Buddhist, and yet the message and the man ever so clearly embody the virtues of wisdom and compassion. We do see shots of Buddhist monks chanting during a Hiroshima memorial service, but this is not the religion Suzuiki was raised with, nor is Buddhism something he took up later in life. His father, he tells us, “found great strength in the Japanese tradition of nature worship. Shortly before he died, he said, ‘I will return to nature where I came from. I will be part of the fish, the trees, the birds; that’s my reincarnation.’”

Instead, Suzuki is a man of science, in the best possible way, a true student of nature. An educator, he speaks plainly about those who have hurt him and those he sees as the greatest threats to humanity’s future. And in speaking of his work, he comes alive with a vibrancy that can make almost anyone love science. A humble man, he doesn’t take potshots at his opponents. Despite seeing so clearly the suffering caused by so much foolishness in the world, he is moved more by a sense of possibility and genuine hope for the future than by anger or despair. He has lived and continues to live a life not only deserving our attention, but also worthy of our emulation.

YouTube Preview Image

The film is showing in selected theatres at the moment and will be available February 14, 2012 on DVD (you can preorder at Amazon).