Jacob Arminius Theologian of Grace– Part Nine

BEN: One of the things that is not clear to me from reading your book is the relationship between the Holy Spirit and prevenient grace in the thought of Arminius. Does by grace Arminius simply mean the divine influence of the Holy Spirit in convicting, convincing, and converting people, or does he have a more abstract and even sacramental view of grace?KEITH: There is an intimate relationship between the Holy Spirit and grace. The operation of grace is the divine work of the Holy Spirit, who … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius Theologian of Grace—Part Eight

BEN: Why was Arminius accused of Pelagianism or semi-Pelagianism if in fact he was clear that prevenient grace comes to a person purely by unmerited divine initiative?KEITH: This controversy is inherent in the Protestant Reformation itself. To the degree that the magisterial Reformation was a reaction to a perceived works-based salvation, energized by the central insight of salvation by grace alone through faith alone, there was a corresponding degree of worry about anything that seemed to … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius Theologian of Grace– Part Seven

BEN: Why was Arminius accused of Pelagianism or semi-Pelagianism if in fact he was clear that prevenient grace comes to a person purely by unmerited divine initiative?KEITH: This controversy is inherent in the Protestant Reformation itself. To the degree that the magisterial Reformation was a reaction to a perceived works-based salvation, energized by the central insight of salvation by grace alone through faith alone, there was a corresponding degree of worry about anything that seemed to … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius– Theologian of Grace– Part Six

BEN: In regard to the old chestnut about God’s knowing and willing it seems clear that Calvin would say God knows it because he wills it, and therefore Calvin makes God’s will (and its exercise in sovereignty) logically prior to God’s knowledge, whereas Arminius insists on just the opposite--- God wills things on the basis of what he knows about things. Right? Further, it seems clear that Arminius wants to say that God acts always according to his goodness, his mercy, his holy love, that is accor … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius– Theologian of Grace Part Five

BEN: Would it be correct to say that Arminius rejects Calvin’s strong distinction between the secret decrees and will of God and the revealed will of God, which allowed for the possibility that God’s revealed will might appear to contradict his secret or hidden will (e.g. it might appear from Scripture that God desires for none to perish and all to be saved, but in fact in his secret will and decrees God predetermined some to be reprobated)? In other words, because of Arminius’ belief in the ‘sim … [Read more...]

The Longest Basketball Shot Ever!– Steph Curry Your on Notice!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9SF2YIKRY8 … [Read more...]

Rediscovering King Jesus (not King George) on the 4th

JamesOssuary2

REDISCOVERING KING JESUS--- PHILIP JENKINSThis year marks a remarkable anniversary in the study of Christian history. Seventy years ago, in late 1945, some Egyptian peasants discovered a trove of early Christian texts including several alternative gospels, all probably buried in the 380s. When they became available in translation in the 1970s, these so-called Nag Hammadi texts caused enormous excitement, suggesting as they did that the earliest Christianity was far more diverse in tone than … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius. Theologian of Grace– Part Four

BEN: Arminius seems to work hard to avoid making God the author of sin, or of anything evil for that matter, including the Fall. He is very willing to talk about God's 'permissive' will when this subject comes up, though he does talk about God permitting such things for two reasons: 1) because he has endowed human beings with genuine freedom, by which I mean the power of contrary choice, the ability to choose or not choose good or evil; and 2) because he believes God can even use evil to some … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius. Theologian of Grace– Part Three

BEN: There is also a strong emphasis early on in the book on what is called the 'intellectualist' approach to the nature of God, which is to say that God's knowledge is given priority over God's will in the divine attributes. This in turn seems to lead Arminius in a very different direct than Calvin when it comes to figuring out the relationship between God's knowledge and God's will (e.g. Calvin and later Calvinists would argue that God knows things with certainty because he antecedently … [Read more...]


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X