I am a heretic and I talk to my cat, Gustavo — It’s on the internet, so it must be true

Usually, I do not respond to folks who engage name-calling. When folks attach words like “apostate,” “heresy”  or “theological celebrity” to me, especially when left by people named “guest” or “anonymous,” my guess is that they are NOT interested in having meaningful conversations. Also, I know that there is no way I can respond with, “I know you are, but what am I” with any modicum of graciousness.

Yesterday, though, I received an alert from Wikipedia that someone had just made some edits to the article about me. The word ”Heretical” caught my attention.

It was corrected pretty quickly by a friend on mine who I will now refer to as Wiksignor Landon Whitsitt. But oh yeah, I screenshot it before it could be corrected.

The first change was in the description of what KIND of minister I am:

And the second was describing the kind of heretical work I am involved in and why.

And then this morning, yet another change was made. This one is one more absurd than the first two; while I may talk to my dog, I am allergic to cats ;-)

Now I have no idea who is doing this. All that he article history says is that these updates are being posted by an anonymous user with the ip address: 151.201.12.39. My guess is that the person probably knows me or has some connection to me. I am not that well-known, so I also bet that it is a member of my own denominational family . . . though that would make me very sad.

In any case, I lift this up not because I want folks to defend my honor. Heck, I DID work on a controversial collection sacred texts. Plus, I’m working on another new book project, so this is buzz-creation with which I have no issue. I just wish somewhere he/she included some reference to a past affair with a troubled movie star or told of the time that I risked my life and ignored my allergies to save my grandmother’s kitten from a burning building.

Oh a boy can dream.

Anyhoo . . . I lift this up because I think whoever this is missed a prime opportunity to actually lift up the fact that some may indeed believe that my work is controversial, even heretical. You see, wikipedia is NOT about trying to win or lose, but about a group of people doing their best to get as close as they can to the objective truth about any particular subject. I have edited my own article to correct or add information, others have approved or rejected those changes and in the end there is a decent view of me.

So 151.201.12.39 , if that is indeed your real name, you could have put something like:

Bruce was part of a church council who has compiled a controversial group of ancient texts titled “A New New Testament” by Hall Taussig. These texts and his involvement have been characterized as heretical by some and welcomed by others.

There could be links back to other wikipedia or published articles on the publication, the author and/or the word “heretical” — all helping the reader to discern the truth about this person named Bruce Reyes-Chow. In some contexts, passive-aggressiveness and mean-spirited snark are the norm and might persuade, but on wikipedia, 151.201.12.39 has probably undercut any chance to actually convince people that I am indeed a heretic, which I assume was the hope all along.

So if you want to leave snarky comments and call me names on my blog, I have no problem leaving up them for people to see, but that kind of of unsourced opinion does not play on Wikipedia. Conflict and disagreement are not bad and I do not believe that I am above any of it, but the kind of arguing and discourse that goes on in most places on the internet is simply not part of the wikipedia experience . . . and I wish the rest of life.

Again, I am not looking for people to defend my honor with colleagues or pile on the trolls. What I hope for is that, even in times when we disagree with one another so deeply on issues of the Christian faith, we can do so always knowing, believing and living the challenge that it is to be the Body of Christ. This is my prayer and I’m sticking to it.

To receive all of my posts via email please subscribe: LOCAL and GLOBAL.

I See Presbyterians

Like many Presbyterians who rode down the escalators at the Pittsburgh airport, when I arrived last night, I was greeted by the, the familiar – and oh so stylish – sight of those Committee On Local Arrangements (COLA) PC(USA) seal-emblazoned aprons. Like the smell of fresh cookies or sizzling bacon wafting from the kitchen, it was a warm reminder what was to come. Yep, it’s General Assembly time - the 220th – for the Presbyterian Church (USA), my denominational family.

In a nutshell, the PC(USA) gathers together every two years to discern the mind of Christ and the will of God together at the national level of our church. Made up of commissioners from across the country, advisory delegates from around the world and thousands of others who love attending this “family reunion,” GA is time when we worship together, pray together and struggle through the difficult calling of being community in the world today, complete with all of the complexity, dysfunction and beauty that families tend to embody. Here is a reporter’s tongue-in-cheek guide to the 220th General Assembly from Jim Nedelka that will give you a little taste of the family fun.

This year, as we descend upon downtown Pittsburgh, we will be taking on many issues. From “hot buttons” ones such as the definition of marriage and our divestment from the Caterpillar corporation, to less-buzz-worthy, but just as important issues as restructuring our special offerings and approving the formation of non-geographic presbyteries, this year should, once again, be jam-packed.

There are a variety of groups who will be reporting on General Assembly from a variety of perspectives but I would commend a few for you to track, not because I endorse them all, but because you’ll get a broad view of what’s going on at GA: GA Junkie, The Presbyterian Outlook, The Presbyterian Layman, More Light Presbyterians, Presbyterian for RenewalCovenant Network of Presbyterians and others. For official news be sure to follow the Presbyterian News Service and you will want to bookmark the official General Assembly Home Page for all information about business items, schedules, live-streaming, etc.

If you are attending General Assembly and have one of them fancy, schmancy smart phones, be sure to download the Guidebook App, search for “General Assembly” and begin tracking your schedule of activities. Pretty sweet app.

Social media will again play a big role in how people connect and communicate with one another about and at General Assembly. Not only do I predict that more than one of us will become Mayor of our assigned plenary seat on FoursquareGeek Alert Level Red – but the Twitter hashtag, #GA220, will be quite active throughout the week.

I will be live-tweeting from @brc_live and posting pictures on my FB Photo Album and if you are on Twitter you may want to follow my Twitter list of those at GA , the List of Candidates for Moderator and Vice-Moderator and @presbyterian for official news. If you or your organization needs to be added, please let me know via @breyeschow and I’ll be sure to add you.

Please keep in prayer the many GA staff and volunteers who keep things running smoothly, the Commissioners and Advisory Delegates who will be debating and voting and the many observers who simply soaking it all in. I would also lift up special prayers from the out-going Moderator and Vice-Moderator, Cindy Bolback and Landon Whitsitt as well as the current candidates, one of whom will be elected tonight.

On a personal note, as a former moderator, my time is pretty cush. I’ll help out with some things during the election, sit in the former moderators section on the plenary floor and generally try to stay out of the way. Like many, I’ll be exploring the amazing exhibition hall so please stop me and say hi, stop at the SparkHouse Animate booth to see a new study that I am part of and, if you are free, you are invited to join me for my Book Release Party on July 3rd at August Henry’s City Saloon.

Let me end by saying that, despite what many say about our General Assemblies when decision are made with which they do not agree, I am a firm believer that GA brings people together from across the church and helps us to remain connected in a culture that would rather have us retreat into our own individual bubbles and clusters. While there is much that can be improved, at every General Assembly there are moments when the Holy Spirit sweeps over the body and we get a glimpse of God’s grace and hope for the world and for us. For these grand moments as well as the random hallway conversations, I am grateful for and excited about what is in store for the 220th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA).

See you around the hall.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X