Defending the “Palin Pick”

Most of you know I’d rather post photos of my family and write about Alaska than talk about politics.  But after reading and watching some recent commentary, I can’t help myself.

The chattering class is talking – endlessly – about Mitt Romney’s choice of a Vice Presidential running mate.  Will he choose a Governor?  A Senator?  A Congressman?  There are many good options for Governor Romney – and all of them have already been dissected in the media – with a list of pros and cons beside their names.  One is too “northern,” another is too “boring,” another is too “white.”  I’ve lived through the scrutiny the family will endure, and it can be a nightmare.

I don’t pretend to know the best pick for Governor Romney.  But there’s one theme that keeps coming up, and it’s ridiculous: that Governor Romney should avoid Senator McCain’s mistake in his Vice Presidential running mate decision.

Chris Cillizza brought it up here:

If you buy that basic way of thinking about the race, it makes it more likely that Romney’s main criteria in picking a running mate will be to do no harm, to avoid the public relations debacle that Senator John McCain (Ariz.) courted when he named former Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his vice presidential pick in 2008.

Later, he describes the GOP as a “party still trying to get out from under the Palin pick.”

Talking Points Memo in an article titled, “Why Mitt Romney Won’t Take GOP Down Another VP Rabbit Hole” quoted a strategist who said my mom is “a case study on what not to do. The McCain campaign really screwed up by going in and picking someone who was just gonna shake up the ticket when they should have picked someone who’s safe.”

In other words, the pundits say Senator McCain made a huge mistake. But where’s the evidence to back up this conventional wisdom?  I’m not a pundit, but I remember the race.  I was there. I remember the frenzied crowds after my mom joined the ticket.  I remember the huge fundraising surge.  I remember her convention speech.  I even remember how McCain/Palin took a polling lead over Obama/Biden.

Then the economy melted down.  You could feel people’s fear.  You could see it in their eyes on the trail.  McCain suspended his campaign to rush back to Washington to deal with the crisis.  A lot of people criticized him, but he did what he thought was right.  And guess what, the economy was melting down while Republicans were in charge.

Take a good look at this list of polls.  Shortly after Senator McCain picked my mom, the polls turned favorable.  But he lost the lead for good the week he suspended his campaign, and we never got it back.  Not in a single poll.

But even then, my Mom helped.  A lot.  She raised millions of dollars that helped us fight hard until the last moment. And Senator McCain actually performed better among those for whom the “Palin Pick” was very important to their voteImmediate post-election polling shows a large majority of Republicans thought my mom helped Senator McCain and more than 90% had a favorable or very favorable view of her.

(By the way, pundits, do you guys do much research before slamming my mom?  It didn’t take me long at all to find the facts that refute your so-called “conventional wisdom.”)

OCTOBER 22, 2008: Mom greets supporters during a campaign rally at the Green High School Memorial Stadium in Ohio, with less than two weeks left before the election.

I don’t write this post to criticize Senator McCain – far from it.  He and my mom had an uphill battle against Obama who promised to stop the oceans’ rise and heal the planet. I honestly don’t think any Republican candidate could’ve beaten Obama in 2008.  It was the Democrats’ moment.

But 2012 is a Republican moment. Whomever Governor Romney picks will be better qualified to run the country than our current President.  And this time around, we’re not running against the hard-to-pin-down “hope and change,” we’re running against a President who can’t stop rising gas prices, much less rising oceans.

Please.

Mom answered the call to serve her country, energized the base, and inspired millions. Plus, she did it with good humor and grace.  I don’t know what else she could’ve reasonably be expected to do.

The economy was collapsing, and the Democrats had nominated “The One.”  My mom worked wonders, and it was such a joy watching her connect with Americans from coast to coast.  But she could not work miracles.

It’s been four years now since Senator McCain selected my mom, and he made the right choice. Who will Governor Romney select as his running mate?  Well, we’ve still got several months before we find out.

Whoever it turns out to be, I don’t envy the next vice-presidential nominee.

After all… Sarah Palin is a tough act to follow.

You might also enjoy:

Connect with me further by:

  • blueniner

    “Bristol Blue Persuasion”your post is getting alot of buzz. All the folks at C4P have got you and your Moms back. This country needs your Mom more than ever to lead us out of this darkness. Ronald Reagan would have been proud of your Mother!

  • smokedaddy

    Bristol- Like your mom you are a terrific writer, as well as being absolutely right on all counts regarding your mom’s candidacy. Unlike our current president, I’ve got no reason to think you fobbed off the writing of your personal story. I’ve admired you as you’ve matured and grappled with growing up in the public eye. Seriously, if this post is a representative, you should pursue a writing career.

    • Gwen

      “Unlike our current president, I’ve got no reason to think you fobbed off the writing of your personal story. ”

      Oh never mind.

    • LMA

      OMG, Smokedaddy! Really?

  • huntingmoose

    Run Bristol Run !

  • http://blatherreview.mu.nu Me

    Chip + Block + Off of

    You do the math.

    Go, Bristol!

  • Sueinthelou

    Hey Bristol,

    Planning on blocker those of us who don’t buy into this BS? Your courageous mother blocks ALL who dare to dissent from commenting on her Facebook page. What’s the “pit bull” scared of?

    • otlset

      Lies, exaggerations, baseless propaganda, nastiness, ad hominem attacks for starters Sueintheloo. Not worth the space and bandwidth.

    • Truth101

      The pit bull is not scared of anythig. I have went to many liberal sites and have been blocked for just speaking the truth. No nasty words just the truth. So don’t come here with you false caring about free speech. You would not know free speech if he hit you in the mouth.

      • Gwen

        Yeah, so I go on the fox “news” website and try to post facts, no foul language, no name calling, nada. Just like I post on here and I’m blocked. But if I choose to read comments over there, I’m subjected to pages and pages of awful things about our President, his lovely wife, his children, Liberals, Democrats etc. Awful, disgusting, foul, things. But you go ahead and believe that it’s only the Liberals who are bad, evil, etc. If it helps you sleep at night.

        • otlset

          I don’t think liberals are bad, or evil per se. I think they mean well, at least those who are idealistic about the country and not merely in it for benefits or other “entitlements” that the government can “give” them. I say this because I was quite liberal myself when I was younger, full of idealism and expecting others to treat me like I strove to treat them — so we could make the ideal society based on respect and caring for others a reality. But through the years, gradually as I took on responsibilities that required my own efforts to survive on my own and provide for myself and those I became responsible for, and continuing to treat others by the “golden rule”, I increasingly became more aware of the other side of the coin, the weakness of liberal ‘progressive’ ideas once they were taken out of the theoretical world (where basic selfish human nature is rarely considered), and attempted to be implemented in the real world (through the only way it can be implemented for society as a whole — by government edict) where a great many are not at all interested in liberal ideals but instead merely what they can get for free (and nothing from government is really free, somebody somewhere pays for it. Most likely it is the much-maligned “1%”! Heh. But hey, let’s continue the class “warfare” BS anyway).

          I realised finally that our society is made up of those who are productive and pay into the system, and those who are parasitic and take out of the system [whether legitimately for disability or temporary displacement reasons among many other reasons for baseline subsistence support, or illegitimately in the case of phonies, goldbricks, dishonest cheaters, malingerers, and other deadbeats, (as well as phony deadbeat government "programs" that accomplish nothing) that slide along with no efforts of their own, just taking from others]. Also in this view only private industry and business that creates wealth are producers that support government and its functions, and all government functions and personnel which take that wealth from private producers are parasitic, in the sense they can not exist without the private industry wealth producers. Which by the way is the reason government can not create jobs that produce wealth, it can only create jobs that consume other’s wealth.

          I realized that in my small business I am one of the country’s producers, which enable the government to be funded and its functions to be paid for. But I also realized and saw firsthand the corruption and dishonesty of those who use government for their own ends, and do not contribute their fair share at all, instead feeding off of others unfairly and even enriching themselves from the government (see politicians and crony capitalism). I realized I had become conservative, and knew I was on the right side — the side of individual responsibility that supports government, not government patronage that inevitably finally comes from those supporting the government through their own individual responsibility.

          • Gwen

            <<<I don’t think liberals are bad, or evil per se. I think they mean well, at least those who are idealistic about the country and not merely in it for benefits or other “entitlements” that the government can “give” them.<<<

            Well, that's good. I don't think that all Republicans or Libertarians are bad, either. I think most of them are just trying to live their lives as best they can. I think they get busy living and can't keep up with what's going on in Washington so they're gullible, and tend to vote on the basis of what they've been fed. Mostly against their own best interests.

            << I say this because I was quite liberal myself when I was younger, full of idealism and expecting others to treat me like I strove to treat them — so we could make the ideal society based on respect and caring for others a reality. <<<

            Sigh. Yeah; and then we grow up, huh?

            <<<But through the years, gradually as I took on responsibilities that required my own efforts to survive on my own and provide for myself and those I became responsible for, and continuing to treat others by the “golden rule”, I increasingly became more aware of the other side of the coin, the weakness of liberal ‘progressive’ ideas once they were taken out of the theoretical world (where basic selfish human nature is rarely considered), and attempted to be implemented in the real world (through the only way it can be implemented for society as a whole — by government edict) where a great many are not at all interested in liberal ideals but instead merely what they can get for free (and nothing from government is really free, somebody somewhere pays for it. Most likely it is the much-maligned “1%”! Heh. But hey, let’s continue the class “warfare” BS anyway).<<<

            Wait a minute. Do you honestly believe that the only "takers" vote Democrat? The only people who are "out for themselves" are liberal? Because that doesn't wash with statistics, which shows that the biggest welfare states tend to vote Republican. Without fail. The states who take in less government money than they pay out tend to vote Democratic.

            And, as long as we're discussing "ideals," I think the moderates of both parties have the right idea. I've been threatened (jokingly) with having my Dem card revoked because I happened to speak up one time and mention that it's my belief that unions have played a small part-along with lots of other things-with the erosion of the American work ethic. The people I was debating with didn't care that I never wanted to see unions done away with entirely (that's not a forward direction) I just thought that they needed work. BUT, that's not a view most people expect from a Democrat.

            <<<I realised finally that our society is made up of those who are productive and pay into the system, and those who are parasitic and take out of the system [whether legitimately for disability or temporary displacement reasons among many other reasons for baseline subsistence support, or illegitimately in the case of phonies, goldbricks, dishonest cheaters, malingerers, and other deadbeats, (as well as phony deadbeat government "programs" that accomplish nothing) that slide along with no efforts of their own, just taking from others]. Also in this view only private industry and business that creates wealth are producers that support government and its functions, and all government functions and personnel which take that wealth from private producers are parasitic, in the sense they can not exist without the private industry wealth producers. Which by the way is the reason government can not create jobs that produce wealth, it can only create jobs that consume other’s wealth.<<<

            Yada yada. Democrats understand that basic principles of economics. They tend to do very well when they're in charge and not obstructed constantly.

            <<<I realized that in my small business I am one of the country’s producers, which enable the government to be funded and its functions to be paid for.<<<

            If, indeed you do own a business, you understand that your success didn't happen on your own. Without roads and other basic tenets of civilization, you'd have nothing. Without workers, business would have nothing. Those who produce goods anyway.

            <<< But I also realized and saw firsthand the corruption and dishonesty of those who use government for their own ends, and do not contribute their fair share at all, instead feeding off of others unfairly and even enriching themselves from the government (see politicians and crony capitalism). I realized I had become conservative,<<

            As if Republicans aren't crony capitalists? The majority of new Tea Party congresspeople are corporate owned! If they weren't when they got elected, they are by now.

            <<< and knew I was on the right side — the side of individual responsibility that supports government, not government patronage that inevitably finally comes from those supporting the government through their own individual responsibility.<<<

            Again, plenty of Democrats believe in personal responsibility. And, we aren't all far left radicals; just as we saw with the last President, that putting an *R* after your name doesn't make you fiscally responsible. It's the middle ground that gets the work done and keeps this nation moving forward and competetive with the rest of the world.

  • Sueinthelou

    Hey Bristol,

    Planning on blocking those of us who don’t buy into this BS? Your courageous mother blocks ALL who dare to dissent from commenting on her Facebook page. What’s the “pit bull” scared of?

    • Millie

      Sueinthelou,
      Well how did you manage to get on here!! Did you just accidently happen to sneak by when
      she was not looking. Case and point you people will do and say anything rather than stick
      with the facts when you are debating. How about having an intelligent debate for a change. Do
      you know any real facts.

  • Pingback: Romney: 'Ook Carter zou Bin Laden hebben gedood', Christie toch mogelijke VP?, Halfzus van Obama schrijft boek | DeJaap WarRoom

  • Pingback: Toast To May Tuesday | Palin4America

  • Mr. Derp

    Hi Bristol,
    Great quote “And this time around, we’re not running against the hard-to-pin-down “hope and change,” we’re running against a President who can’t stop rising gas prices, much less rising oceans.”

    Priceless!

    • dyz

      Derpy — This is satire, right?

  • Clifford

    Bristol, I am really pleased you have written this. It is the truth. Living in New Zealand I have seen how the lamestream media has created a ‘general view’ because it is their papers that get reprinted in our own mainstream press. Thank God for the internet and thank God for you and your mother. Keep it up – you are doing a great job!