Defending the “Palin Pick”

Most of you know I’d rather post photos of my family and write about Alaska than talk about politics.  But after reading and watching some recent commentary, I can’t help myself.

The chattering class is talking – endlessly – about Mitt Romney’s choice of a Vice Presidential running mate.  Will he choose a Governor?  A Senator?  A Congressman?  There are many good options for Governor Romney – and all of them have already been dissected in the media – with a list of pros and cons beside their names.  One is too “northern,” another is too “boring,” another is too “white.”  I’ve lived through the scrutiny the family will endure, and it can be a nightmare.

I don’t pretend to know the best pick for Governor Romney.  But there’s one theme that keeps coming up, and it’s ridiculous: that Governor Romney should avoid Senator McCain’s mistake in his Vice Presidential running mate decision.

Chris Cillizza brought it up here:

If you buy that basic way of thinking about the race, it makes it more likely that Romney’s main criteria in picking a running mate will be to do no harm, to avoid the public relations debacle that Senator John McCain (Ariz.) courted when he named former Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his vice presidential pick in 2008.

Later, he describes the GOP as a “party still trying to get out from under the Palin pick.”

Talking Points Memo in an article titled, “Why Mitt Romney Won’t Take GOP Down Another VP Rabbit Hole” quoted a strategist who said my mom is “a case study on what not to do. The McCain campaign really screwed up by going in and picking someone who was just gonna shake up the ticket when they should have picked someone who’s safe.”

In other words, the pundits say Senator McCain made a huge mistake. But where’s the evidence to back up this conventional wisdom?  I’m not a pundit, but I remember the race.  I was there. I remember the frenzied crowds after my mom joined the ticket.  I remember the huge fundraising surge.  I remember her convention speech.  I even remember how McCain/Palin took a polling lead over Obama/Biden.

Then the economy melted down.  You could feel people’s fear.  You could see it in their eyes on the trail.  McCain suspended his campaign to rush back to Washington to deal with the crisis.  A lot of people criticized him, but he did what he thought was right.  And guess what, the economy was melting down while Republicans were in charge.

Take a good look at this list of polls.  Shortly after Senator McCain picked my mom, the polls turned favorable.  But he lost the lead for good the week he suspended his campaign, and we never got it back.  Not in a single poll.

But even then, my Mom helped.  A lot.  She raised millions of dollars that helped us fight hard until the last moment. And Senator McCain actually performed better among those for whom the “Palin Pick” was very important to their voteImmediate post-election polling shows a large majority of Republicans thought my mom helped Senator McCain and more than 90% had a favorable or very favorable view of her.

(By the way, pundits, do you guys do much research before slamming my mom?  It didn’t take me long at all to find the facts that refute your so-called “conventional wisdom.”)

OCTOBER 22, 2008: Mom greets supporters during a campaign rally at the Green High School Memorial Stadium in Ohio, with less than two weeks left before the election.

I don’t write this post to criticize Senator McCain – far from it.  He and my mom had an uphill battle against Obama who promised to stop the oceans’ rise and heal the planet. I honestly don’t think any Republican candidate could’ve beaten Obama in 2008.  It was the Democrats’ moment.

But 2012 is a Republican moment. Whomever Governor Romney picks will be better qualified to run the country than our current President.  And this time around, we’re not running against the hard-to-pin-down “hope and change,” we’re running against a President who can’t stop rising gas prices, much less rising oceans.

Please.

Mom answered the call to serve her country, energized the base, and inspired millions. Plus, she did it with good humor and grace.  I don’t know what else she could’ve reasonably be expected to do.

The economy was collapsing, and the Democrats had nominated “The One.”  My mom worked wonders, and it was such a joy watching her connect with Americans from coast to coast.  But she could not work miracles.

It’s been four years now since Senator McCain selected my mom, and he made the right choice. Who will Governor Romney select as his running mate?  Well, we’ve still got several months before we find out.

Whoever it turns out to be, I don’t envy the next vice-presidential nominee.

After all… Sarah Palin is a tough act to follow.

You might also enjoy:

Connect with me further by:

  • wodiej

    Great article Bristol.

  • James

    People seriously think Palin would have made a good president? She couldn’t answer simple questions that anyone running for VP should know. She couldn’t even name a newspaper then blamed the media for throwing “gotcha” questions at her. If John McCain was elected as out president then suddenly passed away we would have been left with Sarah Palin as the president of the United States. I have nothing against Mrs. Palin but does no one find that scenario scary? Do people honestly believe she was ready to become the president of the United States?

    • Susan

      Did you know that Sarah had more executive experience than Obama, McCain and Biden put together? Did you know that she had an 80% approval rating in the state which she was governing? If you only based your opinion on two interviews that she gave right at the beginning of the campaign, please keep in mind that both networks carefully edited out huge portions that placed many of her answers in the proper context (indeed, there was over 6 hours of interviewing she did for Katie Couric; hours of some great responses by Palin that CBS chose not to air).
      Was the woman who was the Chief Executive of the largest state in the Union ready to be President? Was a junior senator who voted almost always voted “Present” ready? Do you honestly believe that Joe Biden was/is ready to be President?

      • dyz

        “Was the woman who was the Chief Executive of the largest state in the Union ready to be President?”

        Why don’t you ask the Native Alaskans about Sarah Palin’s record as Governor?

        • Gwen

          No kidding. When they were freezing and starving she did a quick photo op with cookies and scripture.

          • dyz

            Not to mention the “open secret” of sex trade/sexual abuse. Glad to see Murkowski spearheading this.

          • Truth101

            Gwen, You need to get your facts straight. Gov. Palin worked with Rev . Graham to get food and supplies to Alaskans when the weather permitted it.

            Do you understand that? When the weather permitted it?

        • otlset

          Her approval ratings were higher while she was in office (before the Democratic hit-machine slime-merchants started swarming up from the lower 48 after McCain chose her) than Obama’s ever were dyzie.

          • dyz

            Oh boy, otsie, you sure got me!

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqn12Y8RCSg&feature=related James

        Please watch this if you’re a Palin supporter. She has no idea what she is even talking about.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqn12Y8RCSg&feature=related

        Also watch this interview with Steve Schmidt.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tS2cXwFV98&feature=related
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqn12Y8RCSg&feature=related

        I know Obama isn’t that great of a choice but it’s better than having Palin being a heart beat away from becoming our President.

      • James

        9 years of executive experience? LOL, She ran a town of 5,ooo people and had around 50 employees. No one in the media took that executive experience seriously.

        • otlset

          As opposed to Obama’s executive experience in “community organizing” rounding up people to see if they’ve tapped all the government benefits they may be eligible for and telling them how to vote. Oh yeah, and don’t forget digging the “deceased files” for more potential Democratic voters no doubt. ID? Don’t worry, EVERYBODY has a right to vote! It’s the “Chicago way”.

          The people were basically bedazzled, bamboozled, and hoodwinked into electing this most unprepared man in history for president. Thanks a lot. Now Obama’s dug us into a debt hole so far it’s hard to imagine now ever climbing back out without great cutbacks and suffering for all. It will take a leader of great courage to start cutting back on this out of control government beast. Obama won’t do it. Like all narcissists, he’s just out for himself and his legacy.

          I am sure Sarah Palin has the guts to start this necessary but painful process, and I would support her efforts wholeheartedly. It must be done, sooner than later.

          • Gwen

            >>>As opposed to Obama’s executive experience in “community organizing” rounding up people to see if they’ve tapped all the government benefits they may be eligible for and telling them how to vote. <<<

            This is a common theme with you guys, isn't it? You never mention his time in the state senate, nor his time as a law professor, why? Because you can't belittle those things? Because, as someone else here just accused anti palin people, that it makes you feel better about yourself to put him down?

            <<<Oh yeah, and don’t forget digging the “deceased files” for more potential Democratic voters no doubt. ID? Don’t worry, EVERYBODY has a right to vote! It’s the “Chicago way”.<<<

            Let me cue you in on a little secret: that "Chicago" crap (i.e., Chicago politician, gangster, thug) is only witty to those over 60, you know, back when those things were actually going on (nothing against anyone over 60, I'm not too far from that myself). By tossing such silly crap into your comment, you damage any argument you may be trying to make. All this talk of voter fraud is a right wing meme to go along with the extreme voter laws put on the books in recent years. Face it, there is no wide spread, left wing voting fraud happening; Republicans simply don't want Democrats to vote. Period. So they do everything in their power to keep them from voting. Why is that? Can't they win on an even playing field?

            <<>

            Well, you sure can’t say that now, can you? He’s had to hit the ground running and has gotten experience up the wazoo. You know, that killing Osama thang, the keeping the economy from falling off a cliff thang etc.,

            <<>

            Yeah, President Obama did it all by himself. The damned fool. It had nothing to do with the gargantuan mess he inherited, putting the two long standing wars actually on the books so you can see what they’re costing. pffftt

            <<>>

            I agree that turning this economy around is taking courage and President Obama is taking hits from both the left and the right on this. Those of us who aren’t extremely partisan understand that. We also understand that it’s not all his fault though, so there ya go.

            >>>Obama won’t do it.>>>
            President Obama IS doing it. Walk away from fox for a change and listen to some specialists who know what they’re talking about and who don’t work for the very people who are trying to con the American public into putting them back into power. You know, the people who actually perpetrated the economic collapse in the first place.

            <>

            I don’t believe President Obama is a narcissist. He cares too much about people. Poor people, middle class people. People who can’t do a damn thing for him. After graduating from college, he could have gone into a high paid law career. He didn’t do that. He took a few years helping those less fortunate and tried to show them a way out of poverty. That’s what he’s always been about. Your right wing character assault doesn’t fly with thinking people.

            I don’t believe he’s without his warts. All politicians have them. I think he was naive before and I’m glad he’s finally realized that the Conservatives in congress are not like him, in that, they are perfectly willing to take this Country down the tubes just to defeat him. He’s learning to play fire with fire. No one walks into the Presidency fully prepared.

            <<<I am sure Sarah Palin has the guts to start this necessary but painful process, and I would support her efforts wholeheartedly. It must be done, sooner than later.<<<

            I am not sure Ms. Palin has the "guts" to do much more than what she's doing. If she did, she would. She's in a much better position to do something this time around than she was in 08. Her little guy (whom I adore) is bigger, all her older children are better off, she doesn't have the governorship to worry about but she decided to do nothing but a handful of speeches to keep the donations to her pac coming in and her fox appearances.

          • otlset

            Obama in the Illinois State Senate making his typical decisive vote: “Uh, uh…present!”

            Who was the “someone” who got Obama into Columbia after flunking Occidental College? And how did he get two years credit going in after attending only one year, and then somehow getting into Harvard with mediocre grades? All of which of course lead to his stint at the University of Chicago as a senior lecturer (not professor) in constitutional law, which makes one wonder if he knew what he lectured about back then based on his recent criticisms of the Supreme Court (re; Obamacare constitutionality) taking on an “activist” role in striking down laws deemed unconstitutional, which is one of the natural duties of the court and has been done a number of times before. Maybe he just forgot.

            Republicans want everyone who is eligible to vote to do so. But only citizens that are eligible. Why the Democrats want to prevent such measures as voter ID laws to make sure only people vote who legally can vote leaving the system open to fraud, is another indication that Dems are not interested in enforcing and upholding the law in such cases, but pandering for votes by any means necessary, including fraudulent votes.

            Obama has racked up a record 5 trillion dollars in the country’s debt (with nothing much to show for it) since taking office, which has caused our country’s credit rating to be downgraded for the first time ever. The greater the debt, the greater the deficit year to year to make up for and it climbs exponentially faster as the debt rises, now standing at about 16 trillion dollars and soaring almost beyond control. How does Obama plan to deal with bringing down the debt — in any meaningful way — without cutting programs, benefits and entitlements? Obamacare won’t help (as it was first advertised), as projections for it’s implementation keep rising and indicate plunging us further down the debt hole. How much more can taxes be raised before even more businesses and industry move, shrink, or die out completely from the burden? Not to mention the related effect on producing jobs — private sector jobs that in part create the nation’s wealth that pays for the government and allows it to exist.

        • Millie

          james,

          Before you speak again read her record and accomplishment as a Governor, Pleassssssssssse!
          You evidently have not read it or you don’t want to talk about it, just want to bash her.

    • aaron krohn

      To answer your last querie simply and directly…….
      YES!!!!, she was ready to be President of the United States AND Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military, and here are a FEW of the reasons why:
      1. On January 20, 2009, when Obama took office, Sarah had 6 years Executive Experience as Mayor, 11 months of Executive Experience as Chairperson of AOGCC, and (as of that date) 2 years and 47 days of Executive Experience as Governor, for a total (then) of NINE YEARS and SEVENTEEN DAYS of Executive Experience!! Obama had ZERO days of Executive Experience!! As well did Biden and McCain!!!!
      2. The Governor of Alaska is one of the STRONGEST Chief Executive posts in the nation!!! SHE had full authority to make the FINAL decisions for the people she served!!
      3. She created, then passed, then signed into law the three huge programs and policies she PROMISED during her campaign: the Ethics Reform law, AGIA, and ACES!!! And she won these by overwhelming margins!!! (AGIA passed by a 58 to 1 margin!!!!)
      4. She held, at the time she was chosen by McCain, an 88% approval rating as Governor, the best of all 50 Governors!!! Yes, she was THE most popular Governor in the United States!!
      5. The crowds she drew during the campaign were HUGE and LOUDLY enthusiastic!!! She drew 60,000 at The Villages, and 20,000 or more at many other stops on the trail!!! McCain was lucky to draw 5000 if he was there without Sarah!!
      6. She went eye-to-eye with CEO’s of the THREE biggest oil companies in the WORLD!!!! And WON!!!!! (Read all about it in “Going Rogue” by Sarah herself, or in the book “Sarah Takes On Big Oil” by Kay Cashman and Kristin Nelson!!)
      7. Everyone who meets her says she has FANTASTIC effect on them!!!! She listens to them, and learns!! She talks to THEM, not to some camera nearby or to a pollster!! Thus, it is to be assumed she would have that same effect on ANY World Leader she would meet as President of the United States!!

      And I could go on and on!!!
      Suffice to say, I challenge ANYONE to question her validity as a person of Presidential stature!!!
      But please, when doing so, BE SPECIFIC in your complaints!!!
      Don’t just say she’s an “idiot” without telling WHY you think she is!!
      Or why she’s “not ready” to be President!!!
      Etc etc!!!
      Also, while I’m at it, if you are DUMB enough to bring up that “She’s a quitter!!” meme again, I have ONE simple suggestion for you:
      Read Chapter Five of “Going Rogue”, called “The Thumpin’”, for ALL the details of WHY she chose to RESIGN her post as Governor!!!
      If you don’t understand what she said, or believe what she said, that’s YOUR problem!!!

      • Millie

        Gwen,
        We want people who are eligible to vote, people who are living not dead, people who will
        vote only one time. We don’t care wheather it is Democrate, Republician or Independent.
        Wheather you want to believe it or not, it has be uncovered during the 2008 election that
        there was alot of voter fraud, of boxes of ballots uncover that had been put in the back room
        which had not been counted. And what about the Black Panthers intimidation and that the
        Justice Dept under Holder did not touch it with a ten foot pole. What about the voter ID
        in Texas and other states that is under attack by this Admin and Eric Holder. We have
        always had to have ID in our states and many others and I for one want that to happen so
        my legal vote is counted.
        I will say one thing about the Osama thing, Obama is looking bad taking all of the credit for
        that call. Without the Bush Admin and the intelligence that was collected on his watch the
        Osama thing would not have happened under this admin. All of this was in play before
        Obama took office. The timing had to be right and it happen to have fallen on Obama’s watch.
        He had to make the call and did it reluctantly.

        • Gwen

          <<<We want people who are eligible to vote, people who are living not dead, people who will
          vote only one time. We don’t care wheather it is Democrate, Republician or Independent.<<<

          Millie, that may be what *you* want but that's not what the leading Republicans want. They don't want the poor, the black and increasingly, the latino voter into the voting booth because they tend to vote Democratic.
          <<<Wheather you want to believe it or not, it has be uncovered during the 2008 election that
          there was alot of voter fraud, of boxes of ballots uncover that had been put in the back room
          which had not been counted. And what about the Black Panthers intimidation and that the
          Justice Dept under Holder did not touch it with a ten foot pole. What about the voter ID
          in Texas and other states that is under attack by this Admin and Eric Holder. We have
          always had to have ID in our states and many others and I for one want that to happen so
          my legal vote is counted.
          I will say one thing about the Osama thing, Obama is looking bad taking all of the credit for
          that call. Without the Bush Admin and the intelligence that was collected on his watch the
          Osama thing would not have happened under this admin. All of this was in play before
          Obama took office. The timing had to be right and it happen to have fallen on Obama’s watch.
          He had to make the call and did it reluctantly.<<<

          The rest of this is non-stop fox talking points and I'm not going to bother with it. If I thought I could get through to you, I might consider wasting my time; but we both know that's not gonna happen, so…

          • Millie

            Gwen,
            You are right I listen to Fox but I don’t just depend on Fox new I read alot of people
            I can trust in. I can trust in Fox for the most part, and they are not the number one
            media for nothing. Alot of other people trust to, unlike the other liberal media’s,
            CNN (has their lowest rating they have ever had) no fair and balance. NBC, CBS,
            ABC and MSNBC are all liberal some way to the left. You seem to have a problem
            trying to second guess people who you don’t know. I listen to all side and then
            make up my mind for myself, how I think and who I want to vote for.
            y
            You might be surprise but there are some democrate in my home state that I have
            voted for rather then the republician that was running. I vote for the ones who are
            close to what i believe in and ones who can be trusted, who are Christian’s and have
            good morals. If it’s a Republician over a Democrate then that’s who i vote for. If it’s a
            Democrate over a Republician I vote for them. There are Democrates that don’t
            go long with Obama’s idealog. The man has been involved quite some time with
            some very dangerous and questionable people. In the last three years with Obama
            being President I have come to the opinion that Obama does not have the best
            interest of the American people. He has an agenda and he has alot of backers that
            do not have America’s in their best interest. Think Obama is in over his head more
            ways than one. I didn’t vote in the primary for Romny but I will in the election.

        • Gwen

          otlset says:
          May 3, 2012 at 1:13 pm

          <<<Obama in the Illinois State Senate making his typical decisive vote: “Uh, uh…present!”<<<

          This is a spiteful lie. Barack Obama was a very good state senator. He worked on ethics reform, lobbyists access to congresspeople and even welfare reform. Among dozens of other things. This is just petty as hell.

          <<<Who was the “someone” who got Obama into Columbia after flunking Occidental College? <<<

          This is BS, too. You know, having read several of your other posts, I'd began to get a picture of you as being intelligent and open minded. This post took care of that.

          <<<And how did he get two years credit going in after attending only one year, and then somehow getting into Harvard with mediocre grades? <<

          Where are you getting this "mediocre grades" bs? Limbaugh? This reads like straight conspiracy stuff and frankly, I hadn't pegged you as one of "them." I was wrong. And so are you, btw.

          <<<All of which of course lead to his stint at the University of Chicago as a senior lecturer (not professor) in constitutional law, which makes one wonder if he knew what he lectured about back then based on his recent criticisms of the Supreme Court (re; Obamacare constitutionality) taking on an “activist” role in striking down laws deemed unconstitutional, which is one of the natural duties of the court and has been done a number of times before. Maybe he just forgot.
          Republicans want everyone who is eligible to vote to do so. But only citizens that are eligible. Why the Democrats want to prevent such measures as voter ID laws to make sure only people vote who legally can vote leaving the system open to fraud, is another indication that Dems are not interested in enforcing and upholding the law in such cases, but pandering for votes by any means necessary, including fraudulent votes.<<<

          Again, BS. Republicans have long engaged in voter caging and suppression and every election cycle it gets worse and worse. They throw up many roadblocks to Dems exercising their constitutional right. Look up the Consent Decree from 1982, 1986. And, even though they agree not to do it, they can't seem to help themselves. Cutting registration times, early voting, same day registration, even reducing the open hours of DMV's and closing many DMV's in poor neighborhoods; targeting people whose homes have been foreclosed, etc. Huckabee even joked about letting the air out of tires of people you know will vote Dem. Republicans can talk a good game, that they want everyone to vote, they mean every Republican. And some Republicans have woken up to the games being instigated by their party and have changed parties. Others will believe the same old BS, that it's the Dems who perpetrate voter fraud, when the statistics show no such thing.

          <<Obama has racked up a record 5 trillion dollars in the country’s debt (with nothing much to show for it) since taking office, which has caused our country’s credit rating to be downgraded for the first time ever. The greater the debt, the greater the deficit year to year to make up for and it climbs exponentially faster as the debt rises, now standing at about 16 trillion dollars and soaring almost beyond control. How does Obama plan to deal with bringing down the debt — in any meaningful way — without cutting programs, benefits and entitlements? Obamacare won’t help (as it was first advertised), as projections for it’s implementation keep rising and indicate plunging us further down the debt hole. How much more can taxes be raised before even more businesses and industry move, shrink, or die out completely from the burden? Not to mention the related effect on producing jobs — private sector jobs that in part create the nation’s wealth that pays for the government and allows it to exist.<<<

          Sorry, this is just more fox talking points. Do you know how I can tell? By your blaming President Obama for our credit rating downgrade. It's ludicrous and I've spent far too much time posting to you already. I can explain and explain and clear up misinformation till my fingers bleed and it will never get through. You don't want to have an exchange of ideas, you want to tar and feather Obama and blame it all on him. It's a shame.

  • Johnny

    I didn’t vote for John McCain in 2008, I voted for Sarah Palin. God bless, Bristol.

    • James

      So you honestly believe she was ready to step up and become the President of the United States if something had happened to McCain?

      • Pablo

        As we’ve found out, any damn fool can be POTUS. As executives go, Sarah > Barack.

      • otlset

        Absolutely. And it would’ve been the best thing that ever happened to this country in a long while.

  • MikeSilver

    The only reason I voted for McAmnesty was Gov. Palin. The only reason!

  • James

    “we’re running against a President who can’t stop rising gas prices”

    Oil is a global commodity. Its price is set globally, not locally the president has no say in this matter. Look at Germany, France etc… gas prices are over $5 and rising along with gas prices in America. THE PRESIDENT CAN’T CUT GAS PRICES WHEN EVER HE PLEASES.

    • otlset

      This is not absolute, and is merely an excuse for the oil companies to keep prices inflated. We can and should sit down with the oil companies to *discuss* how to best treat the American people while using *American* natural resources. Get it? Such action can start with the president, especially in tone and concerning administrative intent, but the last thing we should do is throw up our hands in resignation like you’re doing and go “Oh well, nothing we can do about it. It’s all global now dudes.”

    • Millie

      james,

      Obama does have a say about America being able to tap into our own energy yet he continues
      to block that. We would be able to get some releif from the pump. The pipeline are in play they
      only have to be brought down through from the Canadian line through America. This would
      creat thousands of jobs and we would be lest dependent on other countries. We have other
      energy options that this country is rich in but we are being held up by Obama to take up his
      agenda to go with green energy that will take a much longer to to switch over yet all that he has
      done in that area he has failed and now tax payer again have billions on their backs and he
      keeps on. Green engery is something that we need to work on but we haven’t gotton there yet
      and the America people need releif now. This way would not take near as long to get in play.

  • MMinCanonCity

    I couldn’t agree more. In fact, I was so disgusted with McCain and his pitiful hands off campaign, I sriously doubted his desire to be elected and was going to sit the top of the ticket out. Then Gov Palin was picked and man-0-man did I love that. I worked my butt off in the campaign for them.

    My beef? I wish to heavens she would have run this time-I would have stopped my life and joined her campaign. It would have been the ultimate showdown between good and evil.

    • Gwen

      “It would have been the ultimate showdown between good and evil.”

      You know, it’s comments like this that really get at my heart as we look towards the future of this Nation and planet. As much as I dislike Ms. Palin, I don’t consider her “evil” and can’t imagine why or how some far right people can look at President Obama and believe that he is “evil.” He really is looking out for your children and grandchildren, whether you can ever wrap your mind around that concept or not.

      I know what’s been drilled into your heads every day and understand to an extent that it’s easier to believe what you’re told by your favorite political celebrities, but I wish more people had an open mind. If not for themselves, for their children.

      • LMA

        So very true, Gwen. But here, I think, is one reason for this “good vs. evil” mind-set: Sarah helped facilitate it. Here’s what she said before the election:

        “Dobson asked the vice presidential hopeful if she is concerned about John McCain’s sagging poll numbers, but Palin stressed that she was “not discouraged at all.”
        “To me, it motivates us, makes us work that much harder,” she told the influential Christian leader. “I know at the end of the day putting this in God’s hands, the right thing for America will be done, at the end of the day on Nov. 4.”

        If God’s for Sarah, then those who aren’t are NOT for God — that’s their reasoning. It’s ignorant, it’s false, it debases intelligent political discourse, and unfortunately, it’s here to stay if the likes of Palin are driving the conversation.

        • Gwen

          “It’s ignorant, it’s false, it debases intelligent political discourse, and unfortunately, it’s here to stay if the likes of Palin are driving the conversation.”

          Amen. (grin)

        • blackbird

          That is just dishonest and it more shows how intolerant and hateful you are. Sarah Palin never suggested nothing of the sort please remove those chains of liberal slavery and open your eyes and see what is going on around you.

          Do your President a favor and please hold him accountable.

          Oh, one more thing, imho “the right thing for America will be (was) done”

          • LMA

            What’s dishonest? Are you saying that Sarah Palin DIDN’T speak with James Dobson and say that God would do right by this country on election day? Look it up. It’s in black and white and on video. Are you saying that, by making this statement, Palin WAS NOT implying that she believed that God would see that the McCain/Palin ticket won? If the right thing for America was done on election day, then what can be inferred from the McCain/Palin defeat? If the right thing for America was done on election day, as Palin said it would be, then why is she — and all of you — so angry?

          • blackbird

            @LMA
            “so angry?” I am not angry, I am sad.

            “dishonest?” is your suggestion that Sarah Palin implied (that’s their reasoning) that her opponents in 2008 are Godless heathens to be punished (good vs. evil) because she said this “putting this in God’s hands”

            So now the phrase “putting this in God’s hands” implies for your opponent “NOT for God” I still stand by what I wrote.

  • http://ladyliberty1885.wordpress.com/ LadyLiberty1885

    I’m not sure who started the spin that Governor Palin somehow hindered the ticket, but they should be tarred and feathered. John McCain was limping along until she was put on the ticket and frankly, I think the majority of those who came out and voted for him were not really voting for him — they were voting for HER.

    • Gwen

      Initially yes. But many conservatives actually sat out in 08 because of her. Once she began her “paling around with terrorist” nonsense and couldn’t seem to speak off the cuff (which is a problem she has to this day) many cons who aren’t far right fundamentalists refused to vote. There are those who believe if the republican voters who sat out in 08 hadn’t done so, that President Obama wouldn’t have been elected. Initially she boosted but, by the end, she killed the campaign.

      • otlset

        This is your opinion Gwen. My opinion is that’s a load of rubbish, in my experience.

      • dyz

        One thing that really bothered me was that Sarah couldn’t name a Supreme Court decision other than Roe v Wade. She sat on a commission about the Exxon Valdez oil spill! I guess it was a deer in the headlights moment.

      • Truth101

        You don’t have a clue what you are talking about. More people voted for McCain/Palin ticket than the Bush/Chaney ticket. How is that sitting at home?

      • Millie

        Gwen,
        There are those who believe that if it hadn’t been for the large amount of voter fraud that
        was instigated by Acorn and other workers within the voting polls Obama would not
        have been President today. If you remember he won by a small margine.

        • Gwen

          <<<There are those who believe that if it hadn’t been for the large amount of voter fraud that
          was instigated by Acorn<<<

          Oh stop right there. Acorn didn't commit any voter fraud. A couple of people who worked for them, who were paid per each registration they signed up, falsified extra registrations for extra cash in their pocket. Those imaginary names didn't then walk in to a poll on election day and vote.

          This is an example of what I mean when I say that certain sources will take only part of a story and create a total fabrication out of it and put it out there for public consumption, knowing that the people who watch won't bother to check it, because they want to believe the absolute worst about the other side, be that now President Obama or Democrats in general.

          • Millie

            Gwen,

            Where in the world have you been!!! You evidently are not able to keep up with
            what is going on very much. I know when I was your age and worked I missed out on
            alot. They uncover a org. in New Orleans that had offices run by Acorn charged
            with voter fraud. They have had to dismantle their org. and I believe I heard they
            have re-organized under a different name. You need to go on line and real about
            that organization.

          • Gwen

            Between O’keefe committing voter fraud to prove that voter fraud happens, to these folks in California, gee, does anyone ever get the idea that the P in GOP stands for projection?
            http://www.news10.net/news/article/192033/2/Sacramento-elections-officials-GOP-voter-drive-suspicious

  • Chuck

    Didn’t like McCrap would have voted libertarian if it weren’t for Palin

  • Jack

    Bristol is absolutely right. It was McCain’s decision to suspend his campaign and pass TARP that destroyed him; after the bailout vote, support for the Republican ticket collapsed.

    After the election, on Nov. 7, 2008, an article published by Rasmussen reported that an overwhelming majority of Republican voters said that Palin actually gave McCain’s campaign a boost. “Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Republican voters say Sarah Palin helped John McCain’s bid for the presidency.
    Exit polls showed the same thing.
    In Pew’s exit poll in 2008, voters who said Sarah Palin was a factor in their vote went for McCain by a 56-43 margin.

  • listingstarboard

    Bravo Bristol! The speeech your Mom gave at the RNC despite having the teleprompter sabotoged was brilliant and pulled the ticket ahead. Until the “conveniently” timed financial meltdown–engineered by the global elite that wanted a socialist. Keep defending your family and punch back at the liberal lies–we got your back.

    • Gwen

      “the “conveniently” timed financial meltdown–engineered by the global elite that wanted a socialist. ”

      I’m sorry. What? If the “global elite” wanted a “socialist,” (maybe later you can explain why they would want a socialist) they sure picked the wrong guy. Do you know what a socialist is? Does anyone on fox really know what a socialist is? I know they chant that phrase all frickin’ day frickin’ long, but I’ve never heard one make any sense. Not to people who don’t swallow everything on that network as fact. You know, that “not thinking for yourself” thingie. ‘Cause Barack Obama ain’t a socialist. Just so’s ya know.

      • lemonv

        …”Do you know what a socialist is?”…

        Ok, let me toss you the same question: Do you know what a socialist is? Then maybe I will know if you really know what that term means,,

        • Gwen

          I most certainly do know what a socialist is, which is why I, and many other informed people believe, he shouldn’t be considered a socialist. Do you think he is one? Please explain. And remember, not all regulation in a capitalistic society is socialistic.