Horsing Around

Elias Peltrouche rides Dance to Bristol (Photo by Jim McCue/MJC)

You won’t believe what I saw in the news.  Apparently, there’s a horse named “Dance to Bristol” who’s on a winning streak:

Coming from off the pace in the $200,000 Honorable Miss Handicap (gr. II) (VIDEO) at Saratoga Race Course, Susan Wantz’s Dance to Bristol extended her win streak to six with her July 29 victory.

What a great name for a horse!  Too bad we weren’t at the races, because we would’ve definitely picked that horse to win and could’ve made some money.

Or, at least we would’ve picked her to come in third to a horse named “Dance to Jennifer Grey!”

Read more on the Faith and Family Channel, fan me on Facebook and follow this blog on Twitter!

  • aflakygirl

    Ever heard that song “You’re So Vain” does she now think that “horse is about her.”
    And since I doubt she reads the news…lol…I bet those paid older-grandma-Palin-age so called “writers,” browse through the internet & post anything Palin. How else would a supposedly full-time-working-mother who has time to date and supposedly attend ASU, have time to search for stories that MIGHT be about her.
    I’m so convinced since most posts are very odd and some are just off the wall.

    • MountainClimber

      No flake, she just thinks it’s an interesting or amusing coincidence, but at your advancing age while referencing a song that’s over 40 yrs old, it’s obvious you’ve forgotten what it’s like to be a fun-loving 22 yr old.
      BTW, your name is very appropriate.

      • Melinda

        Did it not occur to you Mountain that she may have referred to a song over 40 years old because of the age of the actual writer of this blog?

        • Melissa Kelly

          Melinda is so deep . . . such profound statements . . . it puts us all to shame, ROFL

  • Exodus2011

    Hey Bristol!

    ^5!

    #winning
    #leftieswhining

    #AmericaRISING

    **__**

    • Guest

      Like you know Pistol.
      Stay in NZ. We don’t want you here.

      • Exodus2011

        hmmm …. that sounds a good reason for me to come over then sweet pea

        **__**

        • MountainClimber

          Exodus, you better go easy on these unhinged, immature malcontents as they hopelessly strive for attention like someone gasping for air because I think they’re headed for a meltdown.
          The idea of Bristol enjoying her full, rewarding, productive life surrounded by a loving family and good friends seems to be taking a toll on these trolls.

      • MountainClimber

        Looks like someone can’t accept the truth.

    • Glen10in

      whatch it Ex, ya dont want to be banned from here also too.

      • Exodus2011

        hey 10″!

        where’ve ya been?

        btw

        It is extremely clear to me that:

        1. the DC Status Quo has got America to the point of > 100% GDP in DEBT, and near destruction

        2. the US govt must be reformed, undergo a controlled IMPLOSION

        3. there must be an EXPLOSION of American Energy development asap

        (points 2 and 3 simultaneously)

        4. Neocon FP/Miltary Policy must be shelved in favor of a return to the policy developed during the Reagan years

        5. A Leader found who UNDERSTANDS the above 4 points and can be trusted to manage points 2, 3 and 4 successfully.

        NB:

        Points 2 and 3 cannot/will not happen unless the Manager involved is NOT4SALE …. NOT BEHOLDEN to anybody, … just The American People

        THEREFORE, we either need Sarah Palin or Ted Cruz as POTUS (I see nobody else who could succeed at the task required)

        if they sort out between themselves, who it will be, that is fine with me … if it is POTUS Cruz, he will need to hand over the WHOLE implosion/explosion thing to Madame Steel Spine, and rubber stamp her activities, since he has no experience in these management areas.

        He can take care of the rest of the POTUS job

  • Melinda
  • Joy Daniels Brower

    What never ceases to amaze me is how libturd idiots (but I repeat myself) even BOTHER to waste their time and energy following bloggers that they hate but love to mock. I only follow those with whom I share common ideas and ideals. Who has the time for anything else? And, of course, these same h8ers spend all their waking moments obsessing about Sarah Palin and her “vast” SarahPAC funds (she sure has a way with these mental midgets, doesn’t she? Lol…). And, just to show how smart they are (NOT!!), they assume that Palin pays mucho dinero to others to write her Facebook postings. Good grief! She can do THAT with both hands tied behind her back!!
    Did it ever occur to them that she pays top-level consultants to keep her informed about all the legislation being proposed in Congress, all the NOT-”phoney” scandals emanating out of the Ogime and its totally corrupt minions, and a very wide range of both domestic and foreign policy issues. She has regular briefings and she’s better informed than ALL the h8ters put together! Plus, of course, she uses their advice when shaping major speeches she gives across the country throughout the year. The h8ers don’t have a clue, do they?

    • Melinda

      Oh Joy I love when people take the time to wonder about others taking the time!

      And Sarah Palin actually ” has a way” with the poor saps that continue to give their hard earned money to her PAC so she can spend it on expensive travel, the consultants that she railed against at CPAC, and people to write her speeches and posts. Well, not all of them of course. It’s quite obvious which ones she writes. It’s all about promoting and funding Palin Inc. that’s all.

      • disqus_lJapfzCIUh

        Hey Melinda…you are smart…know it all….why don’t you start your PAC and see for yourself what the requirements and costs are to maintain before you continue to mouth off…then…you too can be promoting Melinda Inc. all the time…you are wasting your valuable time with hate and resentment for people you don’t even know…I cannot understand that after so many years of hate for the Palins, you still find the time or should say waste the time to continue the harassment..you could have written a book with the time wasted on insulting others…You try to get the “poor saps” to give you some of their hard earned money and see how long and expensive it is…You seem more interested in pursuing the Obama’s Alinsky tactics of harass…insult…persecute…and all to achieve your goals of trying to hurt people who works for a living….Insane waste of time…

        • Melinda

          The costs to maintain a PAC???? Seriously??? She gave $5k and spent $495k of the donations! If that was a charity she would be charged with fraud. She uses the PAC to promote and fund Palin Inc and pay for her travel.

          • annes_123

            The sad thing is her fans give themselves a pat on the back every time they can send in a cool $100.
            SUV rental = $500 alone.

            I pity those that can only send $25

            Why isn’t this super frugal, non-Diva lady staying at Motel 8?

            I’m questioning facts.. of course will be turned into me being someone just a burnin’ and twistin’ in my drawers seething with envy.

            Using people is not something I envy… sorry to burst bubbles.

          • Melinda

            I love the way she used these donors hard earned dollars to pay her way to that piddly high school grad and to buy their gift bags.

          • annes_123

            She uses PAC money to rent $500/day SUVs and top of the line hotel rooms and yet spends $271 on gift bags from Walmarts for 27 students – $10 per bag… of Walmart stuff!

            She digs deep into the PAC money to make sure she is riding high and yet pinches every penny of the PAC funds when it comes to “giving” to young Patriots.
            $10 goodie bags from Walmart?? I mean open the eyeballs.. that is pathetic.

          • Scott Cameron

            It’s a shame after you’ve read today’s lib meme and received your marching orders that this subject has already been dissected and dismissed by Breitbart, what are you trolls supposed to do now?
            http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/08/02/Daily-Beast-Harasses-Private-Citizens-Who-Donated-to-Palin-s-PAC

          • Melinda

            That article didn’t dismiss anything Scott. Almost all the money raised by the PAC goes to the Palins’ travel, consultants and a funny thing called ” postage”.

          • Scott Cameron

            You’re full of it and you might as well give it up Melinda, no one is buying into your lies, Palin supporters aren’t as stupid as you libs.

          • Melinda

            What exactly have I lied about Scott?

          • probuiltenterprises

            prove it to us. Show us your facts ….not your shallow opinions please

          • Melinda

            It’s all online from this week probuilt. And a link was posted the other day. Do you need it again?

          • probuiltenterprises

            I do not take online info very seriously for Sarah or Obama or anyone else. It tends to be pure emotion and opinion. You know what they say: The internet doesn’t lie…..Bonjour

          • melinda

            probuilt, the online info is filing reports from the FEC. there is no emotion or opinion tied to that. Just the numbers as filked by Sarah PAC.

          • probuiltenterprises

            you won’t convince them Scott. Their minds ( small as they are ) are made up. They hate Sarah and her family so much that any opportunity to rip on them they take

          • melinda

            No probuilt, Scott’s article won’t convince us because it doesn’t dismiss anything about the PAC’s dollars going for Palin Inc.

          • Joy Daniels Brower

            We were thrilled that Palin had the good sense to accept the enthusiastic invitation from Republic (WA) HS to speak at their graduation. It was a goodwill gesture on the part of everyone, and reports from the townspeople and high school family were very enthusiastic.. IMHO, all that was money VERY well spent. And since you don’t know Palin and how she operates (remember, she sold the State of AK’s private jet when she first entered office), Palin is actually very frugal and spends only what is absolutely necessary. Unfortunately, one of the biggest expenses is her private security detail – necessitated by the constant death threats from charming folks like yourself. Her family is NOT, apparently, off-limits to the deranged stalkers, such as melinda and others who have commented obsessively and hatefully on this particular blog. YOU try to live in that world for even a day and then report back to all of us how it REALLY feels!

          • melinda

            Frugal? Really Joy? Do you realize $1700 of Sarah PAC money was spend on two nights’ accomodation at the luxury Davenport Hotel for that high school grad speech? Sure I bet that was absolutely necessary! You go with that.

          • Joy Daniels Brower

            Man, Melinda, you’re certainly living in an alternate universe these days! First of all, I’m an old Northwesterner (first 50 years in Seattle) and know the state well. FYI,Spokane is anything but an upscale city and the Davenport (once one of only a couple hotels in that agricultural center town) is hardly “luxurious!” My God, have you EVER seen an actual “luxury” hotel? More to the point, have you ever booked a room recently in even the most middle-of-the-road hotel for under $200? The Palins probably had a great suite for under $500 (times 2 nights), the equivalent in SFran or NYC being about $1,200/night; but in your studious sleuthing, do you know how many rooms they actually booked? And didn’t they order ANY food for two nights?!? Doesn’t that UNDER $1,700 for TWO nights include more than just one room/suite? And where do you think her security detail is supposed to sleep? In the street? Wake up and smell the coffee!! In today’s world of travel (which is one reason I can’t afford it anymore!), you can’t get in and out of town in a nice hotel, etc. at such a truly reasonable price as they got at the Davenport in beautiful downtown Spokane!

          • Melinda

            Sorry Joy but you’re living in an alternate universe if you think Sarah travels with security detail. And yes, $1700 for two nights at the Davenport would NOT be frugal nor … What was it?…. ” Only what is absolutely necessary. Nice try.

          • Joy Daniels Brower

            Melinda, Tim Crawford, the Treasurer and “head” of SarahPAC, is required only to list major expenses in quarterly reports; details of that (travel) expense (e.g., food, drink, tips, phone calls, etc. etc.) are NOT required. Also, does it say, specifically that they booked only ONE room for two nights? I’d be curious to know (1) how you’re privvy to details that are NOT on the PAC report; and (2) more to the point, how you know the REAL Sarah Palin so intimately? Are you from a distant planet with super-human skills of knowledge and perception? If so, I’d say you’re wasting your time trying to dissect every penny that someone like Palin – who’s NOT exactly in your “inner circle” – spends on her family, her life and general living expenses. And speaking of “outrageous” hotel bills, what about that $3K per night that Joe “Stoli”/”Plugs” Biden spent not too long ago in Paris? Are you down with THAT expense for a joke of a VP who is actually on the public dole and has been all his professional life?

          • Melinda

            Two people ( Todd went with her) would be one room, assuming the couple still share a bedroom Joy. Regardless of the incidentals, $1700k for two nights in Spokane is not… In your words….. ” frugal and only what is absolutely necessary”.

          • probuiltenterprises

            did any of you Einstiens notice the heading above the story? “Horsing around”….

          • Melissa Kelly

            Apparently it escaped their short attention span.

          • probuiltenterprises

            I guess they get their knickers in a twist and cant get it out. I just love the fact that this woman and her family affect them so much

          • probuiltenterprises

            they are pulling every bit of their argument from the daily beast which has recently been debunked. No point in arguing. it will not matter to them as they are one sided

          • melinda

            Um no probuilt, it was not debunked and the information actually comes directly from the FEC filing for Sarah PAC , subnitted by Sarah PAC

          • probuiltenterprises

            jealous are we LOL. Just curious where your man Obama got his money.

          • Melinda

            Obama got the money for his campaign from donors. He currently gets his salary and expenses paid by We the People, because we voted him in as President and that’s the job he’s doing. Sarah Palin on the other hand, hasn’t been in public service for over 4 years and is not running for office.

          • probuiltenterprises

            you really don’t understand do you? Anyone can start a political action committee. You don’t have to be running for anything. She does support other candidates with this Pac. Obama received large sums of money from Pac’s and even Pac’s from foreign countries.

          • melinda

            Oh I understand them probuilt. And so does Sarah Palin. She understands that they are pretty loosey goosey and she can get away with using one to fund Palin Inc. Stephen Colbert did a hilarious piece with Jon Stewart last year on starting his own PAC.

          • Val

            Now why doesn’t it surprise me that melinda gets all her news from Colbert and Stewart, I should have predicted that.

          • melinda

            Val, perhaps you aren’t aware that Stewart’s and Colbert’s shows are not news. They are comedy shows. And very funny.

          • Val

            I know who they are and although my friends in school watch them, they’re too left for me but thank goodness you know the difference between news and satire, I was worried for second.

          • melinda

            You worried for a second? Why? I noted that it was a hilarious piece.How would you jump from that to suggesting theirs were the only places I get my news? Sounds to me more like you might not have recognized the difference between news and satire. Too funny!

          • Joy Daniels Brower

            Don’t worry about melinda, she’s just fine with PMSNBC and CNN for her major news fix everyday; and if sh’e a bit high-brow, probably reads her bible, the NY Slimes, for good measure!

          • probuiltenterprises

            Val: do you see the parody here or lack there of? Melinda admits that Stewart and Colbert are making jokes ….yet…..when one of the Palins make a joke about a horse she rants incessantly! Is it me or does she not see where you took her?

          • melinda

            probuilt, I have not been ranting about the horse joke on this blog. And fyi, Stewart’s and Colbert’s jokes are clever. This Dance to Bristol thing is just lame. But to each their own on humor.

            And btw, I don’t think parody is the word you are looking for.

          • patriot

            Val must watch the factor and Sean hannity, they are comedy shows also right?

          • Joy Daniels Brower

            But in more than one survey, it was learned that the younger demographic (18-22, e.g.) got MOST of their “news” from Stewart & Colbert! The kids like to be entertained and think that biased “comedy” is news! Well, it can all be pretty much chalked up to “the dumbing down of America” and produces what Rush has rightly labeled, “the low-information voter.”

      • annes_123

        Such an amazing thing wisdom is.. eh Melinda?

        A public blog allowing public comments …. people comment.
        If you don’t like a comment you pass on passed it.
        It’s the way things work.
        Not rocket science.

        You’d think this public blog was private and part of a special club only allowing 5 hail Bristols in order to be privy to.

        And yet… someone sees a comment that doesn’t suit their fancy and they pull out their psychology card and start analyzing what type of person they are, what they believe, what’s going on in their head.

        This is a PUBLIC blog = comments from the PUBLIC

      • Joy Daniels Brower

        Gosh, Melinda, you’ve just reinforced that old adage, “Even a broken clock is right twice a day!” And, like most regressive trolls on this and other Conservative sites, you get SOME of the info/facts correctly: Namely, yes, at CPAC, Palin (as she frequently does) railed against the “permanent political class” – which includes the usual money-grubbing consultants, e.g., Karl Rove, inter alia. But the consultants Palin herself hires are not that kind; indeed, they’re very intelligent and very politically savvy, but mostly they just know a great deal about a wide range of relevant subjects and counsel Palin accordingly.
        Many of us not only don’t have much money, but don’t have the inclination or ability to give very much to SarahPAC. Instead, if/when she endorses a candidate, we donate directly to that candidate! But the money we do give to SarahPACc we do so with enthusiasm, ’cause we want to help her “spread the word ” as widely as possible and make it feasible for her to attend important meetings, conferences and events where her message will be given top billing and, in turn, receive very wide p.r. and attention. Even the lib media know that game – and they follow her every word – written, spoken or tweeted!

        • Melinda

          Hahaha. That’s awesome. So when Sarah specifically railed against consultants at CPAC she meant all consultants except hers, paid for by others. Too funny!

  • JohnnyRussia
  • JohnnyRussia
    • MountainClimber

      Another desperate attempt by the failing Daily Beast to find a smoking gun, like in 2011 combing through 25,000 of Governor Palins’ emails which proved what an ethical, hardworking person she is or having some moron move next door to the Palins to spy on them. The Beast must really be in trouble, grasping at straws while loser JohnnyRussia tries to drum up traffic for their ludicrous site.
      Breitbart exposes the inaccuracies of the Daily Beast’s article below >
      http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/08/02/Daily-Beast-Harasses-Private-Citizens-Who-Donated-to-Palin-s-PAC

      • Melinda

        Grasping at straws? Mountain, They are not the only ones pointing out what’s going on with Sarah PAC. And that article you cited does not discount their findings. The PAC spends very little if what it collects from donors to actually help fund candidates. Almost all of it goes to support Palin Inc. And Sarah Palin is not a politician and hasn’t been for over 4 years.

        • Scott Cameron

          Poor trashy Daily Beast, another lib site about to bite the dust as they struggle to remain relevant by using Governor Palin to attract attention.

          • Scott Cameron

            As explained in the article, the first half of 2013 was a political off-year in which there were few elections, but Palin’s PAC did make a $5,000 contribution to Jason Smith. He was the conservative Republican that won a special election in MO in June by a hefty margin, 67% to 27% and that’s called “Palin Power” and that’s why people contribute to SarahPAC.com, get it?!

          • Melinda

            You do realize, don’t you that the Sarah PAC contribution came after it would have made much difference to his campaign? And it doesn’t change the fact that 1% of the funds were spent to support candidates and 99% to support Palin Inc. In 2012, an undeniably huge election year, that was similarly 10% and 90% I believe. Let me know if you want the exact figures and ill get them for you… But something tells me you don’t Scott.

          • Val

            The exact figures are readily available and posted on numerous sites. Didn’t you know that either melinda or did it just slip your mind?

            Relax melinda, SarahPAC is the most transparent PAC in existence. As a frequent supporter, I couldn’t be more pleased with Sarah’s 75% success rate in 2010 and 2012 compared to Karl Rove’s 1%, in spite of the 100′s of millions Rove squandered in 2012.

            Sarah Palin endorsed upwards of 100 candidates in 2010 and almost all of her candidates won. The momentum built by Sarah Palin saw the largest turnover since Reconstruction after the Civil War. In state houses, over 600 Dems lost their seats.
            In 2012, Sarah was batting 1000 until MO when the Dems pulled some shenanigans to get Akin elected in the primary. Of course if Palin’s candidate Sarah Steelman had won the primary, she would have beaten McCaskill.
            In March at CPAC, a grateful Sen Ted Cruz stated he wouldn’t be in the Senate if it weren’t for Sarah Palin!

            Now let’s examine why you trolls are sooooooo concerned about SarahPAC. Could it be that you are scared to death about Sarah’s impact on the upcoming 2014 elections? (Rhetorical question, no answer is necessary)
            Sarah Palin is funded by everyday people and therefore she cannot be bought and her PAC is very effective which is why libs like you and RINOs want to discourage donations. You’ve got your troll-work cut out for you melinda, so long.

          • melinda

            None of that changes the fact that her PAC spends almost all of the money on Palin INc. and not on supporting actual candidates for office. In the most recent filing it was 1% vs 99%. In 2012 it was around 10% vs 90%. And of course I know it’s widely publicized. Why would I want that to “slip my mind”. The figures support what I’m pointing out. You have strange arguments Val

          • Val

            You have difficulty melinda comprehending the facts or else you deliberately distort them. It’s understandable why you are so fearful of Sarah Palin’s influence and her focus on flipping the Senate and maintaining the House in 2014.

          • melinda

            Val, I am not fearful of Sarah Palin. She is no longer a politician and by all appearances, has no interest in being one again on a national level. And even if she did, she is too unpopular and not popular enough.

            And I have no trouble comprehending the facts and I do not distort them. You on the other keep trying to distract from the fact that her Sarah PAC spends almost all of the donations it collects on Palin Inc rather than supporting actual political campaigns.

          • Val

            You have delusions of being a mind-reader too? Amazing that you are the only person outside of Sarah Palin’s circle of trusted friends and advisers who knows what her future plans are or is it just wishful thinking on your part?

            But yet another lie from melinda. Golly, they are really stacking up! Lie after lie after lie after lie after lie . . . . .
            FYI, Sarah Palin has a higher approval rating than the current POTUS and her favorability rating is the highest it’s been since 2009 at 55.14%. As a potential AK Senate candidate she also towers over the others with 65%.

          • melinda

            Val, Palin might be the favored candidate amongst AK GOP candidates, but polls are showing that she would lose the election.

            Wishful thinking? Hell no! I’d love it if she were to run for President in 2016. It would be a sure win for the Dems. But she’s not doing anything to position herself for that and hasn’t done so since quitting 4 years ago.

            Still waiting for you to point out an actual lie Val.

          • Val

            It’s quite simple melinda. First read what you wrote, then read my follow-up response for the correction to your lie.

            Just checked the most recent poll, “If Palin is the AK Senate nominee, she’s favored to win.”

          • melinda

            Sorry Val, but I don’t see any recent poll that finds Palin to be favored to win the Senate seat for Alaska. You’ll need to provide the link to the poll.

          • melinda

            Still waiting for you to point out an actual lie Val. You haven’t.

          • 1MiddleRoader

            I haven’t seen any polls saying she’s favored to win the election, although there may be outlier poll that you saw. While she would be favored to win the GOP nomination, she trails Begich by double digits. One poll I saw says only 16% of Alaskans want her to run, and another says 47% of Alaskan voters consider her to be Alaskan(!). I think that’s an unfair distraction which Begich encouraged, but perhaps karma for her tacit support of Obama birthers. Her unfavorability hovers around 57%. Of course, all this could change if she seriously threw her hat in the ring. – I think many folks, myself included, don’t really think she’ll run.

          • Val

            Oh my, caught lying again melinda! Jason Smith issued this press release in early May a month before the election:
            “Jason Smith announced the endorsement of Governor Sarah Palin. Smith sought out Governor Palin’s endorsement of his commonsense conservative campaign.”

            “Governor Palin is a true conservative who is not afraid to stand up against political establishment . . . I am honored to have Governor Palin’s support in the June 4th Special Election.”

          • melinda

            Caught me” lying again” Val? Excuse me, but when have you caught me lying before? And no, that is not a rhetorical question.

            And this has not been a lie either. The Sarah PAC contribution came on May 14, less than 3 weeks before the election. You really think the $5k donation made much difference to his campaign at that point?

          • Val

            You bet it did. It was a signal to people that Governor Sarah Palin wholeheartedly supported Jason Smith. As Scott Cameron posted, Smith then won 67% to 27%.

          • melinda

            Wow, “wholeheartly supprted” by tossing in $5k at the last few weeks! And tell us Val, how do you know that this “wholehearted support” from Palin was what brought him the win. Was he trailing before her support? Because he would have to be for this contribution/endorsement to have made a difference (in a positive way). Was he?

          • Val

            Another FYI for an untruthful low-info,
            $5,000. is the max a PAC can contribute.

          • melinda

            .. to a single campaign in a cycle. Fortunately for Palin and her “consultants” there is no limit on how much they can spend on themselves!

          • melinda

            I’ll help you out here Val. No, he wasn’t trailing before Palin’s support. It’s a solidly red district and he was expected to easily win. He had lots of support and endorsment before Sarah Palin’s. He was so much of a sure thing that an article was written a few days before Palin’s contribution about how the NRA was missing a good opportunity to make a big endorsement of this sure win so that they could later claim it as a show of support for gun rights. Hmmm….. almost makes you wonder if one of Sarah’s consultants read that article.

            But perhaps you already knew this.

          • Val

            What a humble guy Jason Smith must be, releasing a press statement saying he “sought” Sarah Palin’s endorsement yet you believe he would have won without it. Gosh, I wonder why he would have done that if he didn’t need it, but wait, I forgot you’re more politically savvy than anyone else, lol. How many elections have you won?

          • melinda

            Why did he release that Val? Because he was already a big fan of hers. Did you not know that? He posted a photo after her CPAC appearance, doing the silly Big Gulp pose. Oh you can bet he was tickled by her endorsement. It doesn’t mean it made a difference to his win though.

          • Val

            You certainly are obsessed with everything Palin! You even follow the people who did the liberty pose, lol.
            The question is, since you tend to make-up everything, which is a polite way of saying you lie, are the peeps who pay you to troll getting their money’s worth when you are actually a poor clueless soul and unable to state any facts?

          • melinda

            I follow the people who did the liberty pose? No sorry Val, that’s easy to find when looking up Smith and Palin.

            Still waiting for you to point out an actual lie. You keep making this claim but fail at backing it up.

          • Val

            You just wrote Jason Smith did the “pose” so you must have been following the liberty deal on Twitter!

            You were previously too lazy to even look up the NYT article so I’m not going to peruse over 150 comments to isolate each and everyone of your lies for you.

            Using Rules for Radicals 7, 8, 11, and 12 are we melinda? You can google for links, I need to focus on my work, so take care trolling it’s a jungle out there.

          • melinda

            Val, I’m not even on Twitter. And no, you don’t need to be following anyone to see that he did the pose.

            Too lazy to look up the NYT notation that they redacted some offensive language in the Palin emails? Their redaction has nothing to do with the fact that the State of Alaska heavily redacting the Palin emails before finally, after a very lengthy delay, releasing them to the press. I’ll say it again for you Val, because you seem to be having a hard time understanding:

            The NYT redaction of some offensive language has nothing to do with the fact that the State of Alaska heavily redacting the Palin emails before finally, after a very lengthy delay, releasing them to the press

          • Melinda

            Sounds more to me Scott like Breitbart and C4P are struggling to defend against the reporting on Sarah PAC by Daily Beast and others.

      • Melinda

        And I love it when you bring up those emails!!! You mean the ones that took forever to release and when they were they were so heavily redacted?

        • Scott Cameron

          Yes, the 24,199 emails which were released by the state of AK, painted a picture of Governor Palin as “a conscientious, humorous and humane woman slightly bemused by the world of politics.” The “left-leaning editors who dispatched teams of reporters to Juneau to pore over the emails in the hope of digging up a scandal” viewed the result as “a rather poor return on their considerable investment.” In other words, the scheme backfired on libs, too bad.

          • melinda

            Scott, as you may or may not be aware, the emails were delayed and delayed by the State and when they finally were released they were very heavily redacted. Of course there was nothing there anymore. Anything that was there was withheld. No surprise.

          • Scott Cameron

            Just can’t get the facts straight, can you? The New York Times, Washington Post and other lib media outlets pleaded for help from their readers to investigate the emails because they were so extensive and there was so much content to cover. They hoped to expose a scandal, but were unsuccessful. The NYT redacted the emails themselves to remove offensive language, google it yourself. We’re not here to educate low info, deceitful libs, but we know it’s your job to smear Sarah with your lies, so carry on losers.

          • melinda

            Seriously Scott? Are you really unaware that the State of Alaska, lead by Palin lapdog Parnell, heavily redacted those emails before releasing them to the press. Really? You didn’t know this?

          • Val

            Seriously Melinda? Are you too lazy to look up the NYT article about how they redacted the emails? Or doesn’t that quite fit with your agenda?

          • melinda

            Val, I don’t really care if the NYT chose to redacted offensive language from the Palin emails before releasing them.(I haven’t heard such a thing but it really just reflects badly on her administration, doesn’t it?).

            That has nothing to do with the fact that the Alaska government itself heavily redacted the emails during a very lengthy delay before finally releasing them to the press.

          • Val

            The emails were “sent and received emails.” Weren’t you aware of that little detail either? Governor Palin was not responsible for what other people wrote to her.

            The reason you “don’t really care if the NYT chose to redact offensive language before releasing them” is because it negates your smear.

          • melinda

            It does not “dispute my smear” Val. The NYT redacting offensive language does not mean that the Alaska government did not heavily redact the emails during the very lengthy delay prior to releasing the emails to the press.

          • 1MiddleRoader

            As Wkileaks has shown, Sarah P. used private email accounts to avoid Alaskan freedom of information (FOIA) laws. I disagree with some of my liberal colleagues in that I believe that while legal, the requests were a bit of a witch hunt. While I’m no expert in Alaska politics, I also think she was a pretty good governor, although I think had she stayed in office for the full term, her favorability would have declined. My fascination with Palin is that something seemed to have happened to her during and after her VP run–it’s almost like she’s a different person now. In one of the emails released under FOIA, she says climate change should be a “top priority” for Alaska; now she says, “climate change, my gluteus maximus”. She supported a “path to citizenship” in 2008; now she doesn’t even support the Dream Act. She was unequivocally in favor of capping carbon emissions in 2008; now, not so much.

  • David

    Bristol, I hope “Dance to Bristol” keeps winning.

  • Joseph Ritter

    Haha; that’s cool!

  • Melissa Kelly

    What a beautiful filly and she was born the day before Piper’s birthday!

  • Mike

    Uhh…it is white supremacy that’s doing the necromancy. The bible forbids talking to the dead. We sure don’t dwell on death. Jesus doesn’t allow us to.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X