Why Barack Obama Does NOT Deserve A Nobel Peace Prize At All

As I already said, everyone left, right, and center is baffled today by Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize received out of the blue and before he has actually accomplished much of anything of what he had promised from his presidency (as Saturday Night Live compellingly argued).  Earlier I made an argument that his election merits the award even if his presidency thus far does not at all.  But Glenn Greenwald goes further than simply saying that Obama has not earned it yet to making the important case that he’s not been on the path to being Nobel Peace Prize worthy at all:

But far more important than the lack of actual accomplishments are some of the policies over which Obama has presided that are the very opposite of peace.  Already this year, he not only escalated the American war in Afghanistan, but has ordered air raids that have produced things like this:

That was from a May airstrike in which over 100 Afghan civilians were killed by American jets — one of many similar incidents this year, including one only a week ago that killed 9 Afghan civilians.  How can someone responsible for that, and who has onlyescalated that war, possibly be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in the very same year that he did that?  Does that picture above look like the work of a Nobel Peace laureate?  Does this, from the May airstrike?

Beyond Afghanistan, Obama continues to preside over another war — in Iraq:  remember that? — where no meaningful withdrawal has occurred.  He uttered not a peep of opposition to the Israeli massacre of Gazan civilians at the beginning of this year (using American weapons), one which a U.N. investigator just found constituted war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity.  The changed tone to Iran notwithstanding, his administration frequently emphasizes that it is preserving the option to bomb that country, too — which could be a third war against a Muslim country fought simultaneously under his watch.  He’s worked tirelessly to protect his country not only from accountability — but also transparency — for the last eight years of war crimes, almost certainly violating America’s treaty obligations in the process.  And he is currently presiding over an expansion of the legal black hole at Bagram while aggressively demanding the right to abduct people from around the world, ship them there, and then imprison them indefinitely with no rights of any kind.

there are simply no meaningful “peace” accomplishment in his record — at least not yet — and there’s plenty of the opposite.  That’s what makes this Prize so painfully and self-evidently ludicrous.

Your Thoughts?

  • http://drudgeretort.wordpress.com Ben Hoffman

    George W. Bush also won an award today for his accomplishments.

  • Mary C. Young

    Apparently being commander-in-chief of the world’s largest standing army engaged in two foreign wars is criteria for a peace prize.

  • Peter Norell

    Taken from: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/09/president-obama-wins-nobel-peace-prize?icid=sphere_wpcom_inline

    The citation read in Oslo on Friday morning said that the committee chose Obama “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” It went on to say, “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.”

    Since when has being a source of hope earned anyone a Nobel peace prize? They are awarding him for being a good public speaker, not his actions. These prizes are starting to lose meaning and value.