Beyond Religion To Philosophy

Beyond Religion To Philosophy August 28, 2014

rsz_online_introduction_to_philosophy_class_dr_daniel_fincke

Since I began teaching interactive online videoconference philosophy classes of my own in January 2013, year round I have offered a popular class called Philosophy for Atheists. That class is meant to give atheists an introduction to philosophy, a history of philosophy, and a counter-apologetics oriented philosophy of religion class all rolled into one. It’s for atheists who not only want to learn philosophy but to be better equipped for dealing with their conflicts over religion with their families.

But there have been two groups of people who have asked me for a class for them. Religious people who are interested in a straight up Introduction to Philosophy class that’s more hospitable to them and atheists who are tired of religion and want to move on already to a rational inquiry of philosophical issues without looking back over their shoulders at what they don’t believe.

And so this fall I’m launching two complementary classes, either of which (or both) should amply meet these students’ wishes.

Essentially, there are three broad ways to introduce people to philosophy. You can either introduce the subject topically, historically, or in a hybrid way. I have decided to do the first two kinds of introductory classes.

The Topical Introduction to Philosophy class will be a topical exploration of at least 16 distinct topics in philosophy, treated as live issues rather than historical curiosities. The emphasis will be on what philosophers today say about these issues. What do we today think about them as we debate them for ourselves. The topics will include, but not be limited to Philosophy of Mind, Moral Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Language, Epistemology, Metaphysics, Personal Identity, Social Philosophy (Gender, Race, etc.), Logic, Philosophy of Religion, Aesthetics, Free Will and Determinism, Philosophy of Human Nature, Philosophy of Emotion, and Self-Interest. More information on how classes run can be found at my FAQ.

This veritable philosophical sampler platter of a class will kick off the first time in September, but, if need be, you can join in any week thereafter, and cycle through to get a full course’s worth of topics no matter when you start participating with us. Since each week is a different topic, no knowledge of previous week’s topics will be necessary to know what’s going on. Below are the current times you can self-register for (and we’ll start meeting the first week of September). There is no college credit whatsoever for these classes. 

Topical Introduction to Philosophy: Thursdays 3pm-5:30pm Eastern Time
Topical Introduction to Philosophy: Wednesdays 6pm-8:30pm Eastern Time
Topical Introduction to Philosophy: Sundays 5pm-7:30pm Eastern Time

rsz_online_history_of_philosophy_class_dr_daniel_finckeThe complementary historical introductory class I’m also offering is History of Philosophy. In the past I did a class reading great philosophical works throughout the history of philosophy. That took a long time and we only made it as far as the 1700s. This fall, I want to do a more general overview that successfully surveys Western Philosophy all the way from ancient Greece to the present day in roughly the equivalent of a college semester. This will be my one class a little heavier on lecturing from me as there will be a high information content per class period. There will still be room for students to personally chew on the great philosophical schools’ ideas as we go over.

We overview Ancient Greek and Hellenistic Philosophy (the Pre-Socratics, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, the Cynics, the Epicureans), Medieval Philosophy (Augustine, Anselm, Aquinas, and the Scholastics), Modern Philosophy (the Rationalists, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz, and the Empiricists Locke, Berkeley, and Hume), Kant, 19th Century German Idealists (Fichte and Hegel) and the 19th Century European proto-existentialist reactions against them (Marx, Feuerbach, Kierkegaard, Dostoyevsky, and Nietzsche).

Then finally we address the diverse explosion of movements in 20th Century Philosophy. Students are given a familiarizing overview of the rise of Analytic Philosophy (Russell, Wittgenstein, Frege, Logical Positivism, Ordinary Language Philosophy, Modal Logic, and the division of philosophy into new subfields like Metaethics, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Science, etc.), Pragmatism (Peirce, James, Dewey, Rorty), Process Philosophy (Whitehead), Phenomenology (Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas), Existentialism (Sartre, Camus, Buber, Barth), Structuralism (Saussure and Lacan), Hermeneutics (Gadamer), Feminism (de Beauvoir, Irigaray), Postmodernism (Derrida’s Deconstruction and Foucault’s Post-Structuralism), and Post-World War II Political Philosophy (Rawls, Nozick, Walzer, Arendt). There is no university credit for taking this course.

This class will kick off either in September or as soon as there are students signed up for either or both of the following times:

History of Philosophy: Mondays 7pm-9:30pm Eastern Time
History of Philosophy: Thursdays 9am-11:30am Eastern Time

For more information on how classes run see the FAQ. Price information is in the chart below. Below the chart find the banners for information on three more classes I offer which have little to do with religion, Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy, and Philosophy of Mind and Language.

002_History


rsz_1dr_daniel_fincke_online_philosophy_class_ethics
rsz_1social_and_poltiical_online_philosophy_class_dr_daniel_finckersz_1online_philosophy_class_mind_language_dr_daniel_fincke

 

"I first commented on your post objecting to your statement that "it is impossible to ..."

Atheists Should Persuade, But Not Proselytize.
"Oh dear. I agree that you are obsessed with the delusion that your semantic rabbit ..."

Atheists Should Persuade, But Not Proselytize.
"So you agree that the distinction is semantics? Sounds like you don't like the first ..."

Atheists Should Persuade, But Not Proselytize.
"I do not "believe" that there aren't any any gods.I do not believe there are ..."

Atheists Should Persuade, But Not Proselytize.

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment