<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Camels With Hammers&#187; Philosophical Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/category/philosophy/ethics/philosophical-ethics-ethics-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers</link>
	<description>Philosophy, Ethics, Atheism, Nietzsche</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Anything Intrinsically Good or Bad? An Interview with James Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/06/james-gray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/06/james-gray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contemporary Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Theory of Morality's Rational Foundations and Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teleology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=22491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Gray blogs at Ethical Realism. He is passionate about advancing philosophy education and exploring moral realism both in ways accessible to beginners and engaging for advanced philosophy students. The interview below was done as part of a blogathon to support the Secular Student Alliance. Please donate to this worthy organization! And see more links [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/06/james-gray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Unintentionally Intimidating People</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/05/on-unintentionally-intimidating-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/05/on-unintentionally-intimidating-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 19:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contemporary Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Vices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Virtues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Modesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intimidating People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Deprecation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensitivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=21899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While most of us rightly want to be exceptional in some way or another, we often feel a lot of social and moral pressure not to think of ourselves as generally better than others. And, even more urgently, we feel pressure not to convey to others that we think ourselves superior and not to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/05/on-unintentionally-intimidating-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Faith Theoretically Makes People Less Likely To Be Trustworthy</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/04/how-faith-theoretically-makes-people-more-likely-to-be-less-trustworthy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/04/how-faith-theoretically-makes-people-more-likely-to-be-less-trustworthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth as intrinsic good]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=21420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am learning that there are a lot of people out there who are surprisingly willful in believing whatever they want and who actively resist information or ideas that they highly suspect (or outright know) would have the power to disabuse them of their errors. We all probably do this to one extent or another [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/04/how-faith-theoretically-makes-people-more-likely-to-be-less-trustworthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dubious Value of Interpersonal Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/the-dubious-value-of-interpersonal-charity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/the-dubious-value-of-interpersonal-charity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contemporary Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=20627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am reading Alain de Botton&#8217;s Religion for Atheists: A Non-believer&#8217;s Guide to the Uses of Religion chapter by chapter and blogging about it as I go. In the book he is trying to collect insights from religions that might inform the lives of convinced atheists. There are several points of contention I have about his analysis [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/the-dubious-value-of-interpersonal-charity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, You Can&#039;t Call People Sluts.</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/no-you-cant-call-people-sluts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/no-you-cant-call-people-sluts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=20542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since Rush Limbaugh tried to slut-shame a law student for testifying at a forum hosted by Congressional Democrats about the medical needs that contraception serves, I had wanted to go through all Limbaugh&#8217;s remarks and detail the millions of ways they were awful for the morally obtuse. But I kept thinking, no, it&#8217;s just too [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/no-you-cant-call-people-sluts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>195</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Misogynistic Language Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/why-misogynistic-language-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/why-misogynistic-language-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contemporary Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=20538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the vileness of Rush Limbaugh giving Physicalist pause about whether to consume any right wing media (even out of concern for rational fairness), Bret asks: I’m curious: do you see how conservatives verbally address women as more offensive than their stance on pretty much anything else, from their treatment of the poor [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/03/why-misogynistic-language-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Atheism Is A Moral Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/new-atheism-is-a-moral-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/new-atheism-is-a-moral-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheistic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=20379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I argued that when fundamentalist religious people, out of an inflated sense of privilege, demand that no one never offend them, that atheists should challenge the moral rightness of the fundamentlists&#8217; specific, hypersensitive, unwarranted feelings of offense. I argued we should do this rather than indiscriminately defend the right to morally offend people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/new-atheism-is-a-moral-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moral Offense Is Not Morally Neutral</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/moral-offense-is-not-morally-neutral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/moral-offense-is-not-morally-neutral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=20366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple weeks ago I challenged the notion that everyone has the moral right to be offended by whatever they happen to feel offended by. I acknowledged, of course, that we do (and should) have the legal right to feel whatever feelings we do. But morally, I argued, we are not justified to take offense unless [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/moral-offense-is-not-morally-neutral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, Not Everyone Has A Moral Right To Feel Offended By Just Any Satire or Criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/not-everyone-has-a-right-to-be-offended-by-just-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/not-everyone-has-a-right-to-be-offended-by-just-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contemporary Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Vices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Virtues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy Of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["You Have The Right To Be Offended"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Drennon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denial of Atheists From Gelato shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gelatogate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Defense of Blasphemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offense as a Moral Category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offense As Value Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Offense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satirizing Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticon IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values Perceptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=18985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4 Misconceptions About the Nature of Offense Here are four common sense assumptions about giving and taking offense that I think are fundamentally mistaken and which atheists need to argue against: “You have every right to be offended, but you don’t have the right to censor others just because you’re offended.” &#8220;You cannot blame people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/not-everyone-has-a-right-to-be-offended-by-just-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Emotivistic Moral Nihilism Rationally Consistent?</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/is-emotivistic-moral-nihilism-rationally-consistent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/is-emotivistic-moral-nihilism-rationally-consistent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contemporary Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Theory of Morality's Rational Foundations and Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=19799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taylor: I know you’re bothered that I don’t believe in objective values, Pat, but I assure you I still care about the same things that you do. I just don’t say I&#8217;m being “objective” when I do so. Pat: I don’t know why you think I would be impressed by that. Taylor: Well when you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/is-emotivistic-moral-nihilism-rationally-consistent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
