<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Camels With Hammers&#187; Physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/category/religion-and-science/science/physics-science-religion-and-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers</link>
	<description>Philosophy, Ethics, Atheism, Nietzsche</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Higgs Boson Research Explained With Cool Cartoon</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/05/higgs-boson-research-explained-with-cool-cartoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/05/higgs-boson-research-explained-with-cool-cartoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higgs Boson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the Higgs Boson?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=21640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t say I understand all of this but it&#8217;s fascinating to try: Go to PhD Comics for individual images from the video. Your Thoughts?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/05/higgs-boson-research-explained-with-cool-cartoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Matter?</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/what-is-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/what-is-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauli exclusion principle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=20369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Learn in a couple minutes: I ran this by a padawan physicist (i.e., a physics graduate student) and here was his verdict on the accuracy: It&#8217;s cute and amusing, but accurate. There are two caveats I&#8217;d add though. Pauli exclusion principle prohibits two electrons from being in the same state, or two muons from being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2012/02/what-is-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Not Everything In Life Is Logical&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/10/not-everything-in-life-is-logical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/10/not-everything-in-life-is-logical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arguments Against The Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arguments for the Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Not Everything In Life Is Logical"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naturalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=18700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we rationalists, naturalists, and other assorted atheists insist that no one should form beliefs that disregard logic and evidence, the defenders of faith often tell us that &#8220;Not everything in life is logical&#8221;, or use some variant of this phrase. What might they mean by this? Where is their confusion exactly and how best [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/10/not-everything-in-life-is-logical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documentary with Stephen Hawking about Whether God Created the Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/10/documentary-with-stephen-hawking-about-whether-god-created-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/10/documentary-with-stephen-hawking-about-whether-god-created-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arguments Against The Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arguments for the Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheist Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/?p=18475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Thoughts?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/10/documentary-with-stephen-hawking-about-whether-god-created-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learn About Dark Matter In One Minute</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/08/learn-about-dark-matter-in-one-minute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/08/learn-about-dark-matter-in-one-minute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 03:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camelswithhammers.com/?p=16503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More one minute physics lessons here. H/T: Greg Laden Your Thoughts?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/08/learn-about-dark-matter-in-one-minute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawrence Krauss Replies To William Lane Craig&#8217;s Crowing</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/04/lawrence-krauss-replies-to-william-lane-craigs-crowing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/04/lawrence-krauss-replies-to-william-lane-craigs-crowing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arguments Against The Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arguments for the Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Krauss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Lane Craig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camelswithhammers.com/?p=15746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physicist Lawrence Krauss recently debated William Lane Craig and was appalled by both his tactics in the debate and his subsequent representations of it. Krauss is eager to get his own account of events to a wider audience, so in the interest of contributing to that end, I am reproducing it in full below. You [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/04/lawrence-krauss-replies-to-william-lane-craigs-crowing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rachel Maddow Explains The Nuclear Threat In Japan</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/03/rachel-maddow-explains-the-nuclear-threat-in-japan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/03/rachel-maddow-explains-the-nuclear-threat-in-japan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camelswithhammers.com/?p=15674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This account of how nuclear power works and what the current danger was remarkably clarifying for me: Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy Dr. Maddow would truly make a superb physics professor (you know, if she actually had as good a grasp of all physics as she has of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/03/rachel-maddow-explains-the-nuclear-threat-in-japan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Atheistic Fine Tuning Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/03/the-atheistic-fine-tuning-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/03/the-atheistic-fine-tuning-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arguments Against The Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arguments for the Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camelswithhammers.com/?p=15548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Eric Steinhart Every one of the standard arguments for the existence of God can be reformulated as an argument against the existence of God. Consider the Fine Tuning Argument. The theistic version of the Fine Tuning Argument goes like this: (1) The Fine Tuning Argument is sound. (2) If the Fine Tuning Argument is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/03/the-atheistic-fine-tuning-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Simulation Hypothesis</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/02/the-simulation-hypothesis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/02/the-simulation-hypothesis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arguments for the Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camelswithhammers.com/?p=15256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Eric Steinhart Atheists can use the traditional arguments for God in strange new ways.  There’s no reason to reject those arguments – on the contrary, I think they should be carefully studied, and their flaws should be repaired.  But I don’t think they lead to God.  I love the Cosmological Arguments.  And the ones [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/02/the-simulation-hypothesis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://ia700103.us.archive.org/9/items/ConversationsFromThePaleBlueDot062EricSteinhart/062-EricSteinhart.mp3" length="39791467" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cat Faber&#8217;s &#8220;The Words Of God&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/02/cat-fabers-the-words-of-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/02/cat-fabers-the-words-of-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fincke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camelswithhammers.com/?p=14521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another, meditative Sunday afternoon song, each of I&#8217;ve lifted from either this post or its comments section). This one though is not satirical and should be genuinely amenable to the more sophisticated theist (or pantheist or other believer in a philosopher&#8217;s god of some sort), who wants more God in her view of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/02/cat-fabers-the-words-of-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
