“Before and After”: Cain, Abel, and Archetypes

1 Now the man knew his wife Eve, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have produced a man with the help of the Lord.” 2 Next she bore his brother Abel. Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, and Cain a tiller of the ground. 3 In the course of time Cain brought to the Lord an offering of the fruit of the ground, 4 and Abel for his part brought of the firstlings of his flock, their fat portions. And the Lord had regard for Abel and his offering, 5 but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell. 6 The Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry, and why has your countenance fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is lurking at the door; its desire is for you, but you must master it.” 8 Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let us go out to the field.” And when they were in the field, Cain rose up against his brother Abel, and killed him. 9 Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?” He said, “I do not know; am I my brother’s keeper?” 10 And the Lord said, “What have you done? Listen; your brother’s blood is crying out to me from the ground! 11 And now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. 12 When you till the ground, it will no longer yield to you its strength; you will be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth.” 13 Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is greater than I can bear! 14 Today you have driven me away from the soil, and I shall be hidden from your face; I shall be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth, and anyone who meets me may kill me.” 15 Then the Lord said to him, “Not so! Whoever kills Cain will suffer a sevenfold vengeance.” And the Lord put a mark on Cain, so that no one who came upon him would kill him. 16 Then Cain went away from the presence of the Lord, and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden. 17 Cain knew his wife, and she conceived and bore Enoch; and he built a city, and named it Enoch after his son Enoch.

Genesis 4

Note: This post is part of an ongoing series tracing “The Book of J” strand of Genesis. A link to previous entries in this sermon can be found at the bottom of each post.

For many people, including myself, a metaphorical and mythological reading of the Bible’s earliest chapters is much more exciting and compelling than more literal approaches. As we saw last week with the Garden of Eden story, this traditional tale explodes with meaning when read through the lens of archetypes. I invited you to consider that Genesis 3 is a deeply true universal story that continues to hold important lessons about the human condition, even though this precise series of events never happened historically. Among the many possible meanings, it’s a story about growing up, becoming aware of good and evil, and learning that our actions have consequences. It’s a tale about that instant when the veil of childhood innocence drops away for the first time and we realize our mortality; it’s about that moment when we realize that we too are someday going to die.

[Read more...]

Do You Believe in Miracles?

(E. Kent Rogers, 12 Miracles of Spiritual Growth: A Path of Healing from the Gospels, Swedenborg Foundation Press, 2012, 210 pages.)

The opening track of Paul Simon’s landmark album Graceland ruminates on what the word “miracle” means in the twenty-first century:

These are the days of miracle and wonder / This is the long distance call … / The way we look to a distant constellation / That’s dying in a corner of the sky / These are the days of miracle and wonder…. / Medicine is magical and magical is art / The Boy in the Bubble / And the baby with the baboon heart / And I believe / These are the days of lasers in the jungle / Lasers in the jungle somewhere / Staccato signals of constant information … / These are the days of miracle and wonder. (“Boy in the Bubble”)

Indeed, in many ways, modern technology regularly performs more miraculous feats than even the boldest ancient miracle worker would have claimed to have been able to accomplish. The Hubble Space Telescope and the Large Hadron Collider give us miraculous vision: “eyes to see” farther and deeper into the universe that previous generations could not even conceive as possible. The healing power of medical science is extending length and quality of life for stunning numbers of people across the planet. And devices such as iPhones can allow crystal-clear “Facetime” video conferences for two people on opposites sides of the globe.

[Read more...]

Paradise Lost or Outgrown? Genesis 3, Original Blessing, and Original Responsibility

1 Now the serpent said to the woman, “Did God say, “You shall not eat from any tree in the garden’?” 2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden; 3 but God said, “You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, nor shall you touch it, or you shall die.’ ” 4 But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not die; 5 for God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” 6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate. 7 Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made loincloths for themselves.

Note: This sermon is part of an ongoing series tracing “The Book of J” strand of Genesis.

In many Christian circles, conventional wisdom holds that humans were “cursed” with original sin when — approximately 6,000 years ago — the first two human beings, Adam and Eve, ate the forbidden fruit. The alleged result was the so-called “fall” of humanity from Paradise. There are places in the Apocrypha and in the New Testament that support this view, although a theology of the “Fall” and “Original Sin” did not become dominant until the writings of Augustine in the 4th century, more than three centuries after the life of Jesus and more than a thousand years after the story of Adam and Eve was first recorded. But the original authors and audience of Genesis 3 did not understand the story in this way. Also, neither Judaism nor the Eastern Orthodox strand of Christianity has a tradition of reading Genesis 3 as being about a “Fall from Grace” or about “Original Sin.”

Indeed, although we will not get to the story of Cain and Abel until next week, it is important to note that the Hebrew word for “sin” is not used at all in the first three chapters of Genesis, and eating from the tree is never declared “sinful” in the text. The word “sin” first appears in Genesis 4:7 about the first murder. Many of us in the West have inherited a way of reading the Bible that is heavily influenced by both Augustine and Martin Luther, who imposed their own issues with guilt and sin onto the Bible’s earliest chapters. So, what I want to invite us to experiment with laying aside what we think (or have been taught) that Genesis 3 is about, and closely read for ourselves what the text actually says.

[Read more...]

Letters to a Future Church: Take Risks, Be Honest, Stop Equivocating

(Letters to a Future Church: Words of Encouragement and Prophetic Appeals, edited by Chris Lewis, InterVarsity Press, 176 pages.)

This book collects letters from 25 Christian leaders in response to the question, “If you had one thing to say to the church, what would it be?” Respondents include Kester Brewin, Walter Brueggemann, Peter Rollins, Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, Ron Sider, Rachel Held Evans, and Shane Claiborne — as well as previously published “bonus letters” from Will Willimon, Gardner Taylor, and Eugene Peterson.

Despite these big names, my favorite letter was from Janell Anema with whom I was previously unfamiliar. Her letter is woven throughout the book as Interludes. Here’s an excerpt from the final part:

Church, you had me at hello, and I love you, but I want more for us now. I want more life. I want more mercy. I want rivers of justice that flow from the throne whose waters quench the thirst of trees whose leaves offer healing to the nations. I want revelation. I want heaven here. I want the kingdom come.

Amen.

In response to these 25 letters, Patheos has invited me and many other bloggers to write our own letter to the Church. Whether or not you read this book, you are also invited to write your own letter and submit it to  the Letter-Writing Contest InterVarsity Press is hosting for this book. The top 3 letter-writers (chosen by IVP) will receive gift packages and also be published at Patheos.

My letter would read as follows:

[Read more...]

Preaching “The Book of J”: Are There Hidden Books in the Bible?

 

In the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens, 5 when no plant of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up — for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no one to till the ground; 6 but a stream would rise from the earth, and water the whole face of the ground — 7 then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being. 8 And the Lord God planted a garden in Eden, in the east; and there he put the man whom he had formed…. 18 Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner.” 19 So out of the ground the Lord God formed every animal of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name. 20 The man gave names to all cattle, and to the birds of the air, and to every animal of the field; but for the man there was not found a helper as his partner. 21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then he took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. 22 And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. 23 Then the man said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; this one shall be called Woman, for out of Man this one was taken.”

Genesis 2:4b-23

How many books are in the Bible? If you don’t know the answer to this piece of trivia, the answer is easy to
find from the table of contents in your favorite Bible. The results will vary based on if the Bible at hand includes various parts of the Apocrypha used by different branches of the Eastern Orthodox or Roman Catholic churches. But if you check a standard Protestant Bible, you should find 27 books in the New Testament and 39 books in the Hebrew Scriptures, for a total of 66 books in the Bible. However, as we saw in our studies of Matthew and Mark, many scholars think that there are “hidden” books in the Bible. These books are not hidden in The Da Vinci Code sense. They won’t lead you to a buried pirate treasure chest, and there is not a secret decoder ring hidden in a bank vault that will help you find the hiding place.

The ‘hidden’ books in question are the books used as source material to compile the final version of the biblical books with which we are familiar. As scholars have studied the Bible over many centuries, they began to notice clues of how the original authors and editors of the Bible stitched together the material at their disposal. As we saw with the Gospels, most scholars are now convinced that the best current explanation for how Matthew, Mark, and Luke were composed is that Matthew and Luke, writing independently, had a copy on their respective desks of both the Gospel of Mark and another written source that scholars call “Q.” The letter Q is a shorthand for the German word Quelle, which means “source.” And scholars hypothesize this source as an explanation for how to explain two facts: on one hand, Matthew and Luke share more than 200 verses almost verbatim in common that are not in Mark; but on the other hand, Matthew and Luke do not seem to be aware of one another’s books. The hypothetical existence of Q is the best current theory of Matthew and Luke’s common source, part of which is now “hidden,” so to speak, in those respective Gospels.

[Read more...]

Individuation, The Beatles, and the Journey to Wholeness

Note: This post is part of our Lenten study of Joyce Rockwood Hudson’s book Natural Spirituality: Recovering the Wisdom Tradition in Christianity. Links to the previous installments in this series on “Jungian Spirituality” will be included at the end of each post in this series.

In the evangelical Christianity of my childhood, the major turning point in someone’s spiritual journey was “accepting Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior.” Once you believed that “Jesus died on the cross for your sins,” the rest was downhill. And this decision could be made as soon as soon as you were old enough to comprehend the basics of what it means to follow Jesus. I made this decision and was baptized around age ten, about the same time as many of my friends.

This Lent we’ve been studying a significantly different understanding of the spiritual life. Instead of the next world, the focus is on the just how deep our inner and outer religious experience can be in this world and during this life. Instead of a single decision that can be made even by a small child, the emphasis is an ongoing, lifelong process of spiritual growth that most people cannot even begin to be comprehended until middle age at the earliest.

[Read more...]