There must be a great deal of shock involved for those first-time offenders who find themselves in prison. There is the shock of realizing you’ve been caught and sentenced. There is the shock of the strip search and the first night in a terrifying place. And then, for some, there is the shock of being released after only a short period of prison time has passed.
A new form of “disciplinary” action has been approved for Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana that involves quick probation time for first-time offenders. “Shock Probation,” as it is called, is an attempt to scare people straight by way of the court system. A New York Times piece summarizes it as follows:
“For many a first offender, the worst part of prison comes in those shocking first days behind bars. Stunned by the strip search on entering, the frightening, unfamiliar vastness of the prison and the long incarceration stretching ahead, the new inmate is overwhelmed. On the theory that the first taste of prison may have at least as much curative effect as the full dose, a few states, including Indiana and Ohio, have quietly been practicing what they call ‘shock probation.'”
After serving only 30 or 60 days of their sentence an inmate can be released with the hope that they are thoroughly reformed. The results have been as “shocking” as anything else, proving to be rather effective in both Ohio and Kentucky. What shocks me, however, has nothing to do with the results of the project but its lack of interest in justice. This probationary method only further reveals the shift in our culture – which happened a long time ago it seems – from justice to reform. We are no longer a culture interested in justice, in making people pay their dues and debts. But we are now a society interested in second chances, and third chances even. On the surface this sounds like a good thing, but I’d like to argue that it is not.
Where is the justice in this case? It walks out the prison gates along with the criminal. And as the two leave one smiles, and the other dies.