Mixed Signals: Revamping the Obama Brand

Mixed Signals is Erin Straza’s weekly musing about marketing miscellany in advertising, branding, and messaging.

It doesn’t take a marketing expert to recognize that elections are made up of carefully crafted messages developed to win the hearts and minds of the voters. This is especially true for our presidential elections.

According to a USA Today article by Susan Page, the messages presidential candidates develop and distribute determine their election fate. Clear, simple messages that promise to fulfill the needs of the voters are most successful.

That’s why Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign message—Hope and Change—was so powerful. Voters understood what he promised, and they wanted what he offered.

And there’s the rub: Obama’s 2008 campaign was so successful that he became synonymous with his brand. It’s now 2012, and that message is old news. Polls show that voters are no longer sure President Obama can deliver on his brand promise. So unless he successfully rebrands himself, he will lose the next election.

But I’m wondering, is the 2008 brand really the problem? Or is the real problem our unrealistic expectation of those serving in political leadership?

Our consumerist mentality at the polls converts the voting booth to a retail counter where we purchase the product (i.e., the candidate) that offers the benefits we desire. Brand Obama promised Hope and Change—and by golly, we want Hope and Change. Never mind that Obama is a person, a human being, working within the confines of our government structure and in the midst of myriad variables he cannot control.

Expecting our leaders to deliver the life we want when we want it places them in the position only God can fulfill. Only God can promise and make good on the promise for true Hope and Change, for this life and for the next. No elected official is capable of this.

When President Obama unveils his 2012 branding message, as voters, let’s see what he is offering and determine if it is reasonable to expect delivery. As believers, let’s remember that he is human and look to God to provide what our hearts truly long for.

"Radford made a connection between Ender and Hitler.Another possible connection: Could Card have been referring ..."

‘Ender’s Game,’ Genocide, and Moral Culpability
"Faith is the confidence that what we hope for will actually happen; it gives us ..."

Music Matters: David Bowie, Still Not ..."
""that many of us do not accept that a few cells of human DNA constitute ..."

How I Changed My Mind About ..."
"No thought given to the unborn child whose life was 'silenced and oppressed'... sad."

How I Changed My Mind About ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://goodokbad.com/ Seth T. Hahne

    Whoever finally realizes the marketing genius of taking up the slogan, “The Better of Two Evils,” will win by a landslide. Almost everyone I talk to wants to vote for the better of two evils. And the great thing about it is that it’s a slogan that a) reusable every election and b) doesn’t raise voter expectations to astronomical heights like Hope/Change did.