Every Monday in Citizenship Confusion, Alan Noble discusses how we confuse our heavenly citizenship with citizenship to the state, culture, and the world.
As a kid, one of my favorite things to do was to start a “club” with my friends. I enjoyed starting these clubs so much that sometimes starting the club was the only thing the “club” ever did, which was fine because the important thing was that I was In a Club. I loved being a part of something significant, being on the Inside, Belonging. And, if I’m honest, I still love that feeling. Looking around at Evangelical Culture, I notice I’m not the only one.
Maybe the story we like to tell ourselves the most has us cast as the Pure, True Heritage of the Founding Fathers and the persecuted minority in a Liberal, Secular, Postmodern culture. This way we can feel like we’re the ones who really Belong in America while retaining a nice victim complex (As I’ve argued here: Citizenship Confusion: Ray Comfort and the Victim Complex in the American Church).
The story goes that the founding fathers were really Christians, and therefore the US is by design a Christian Nation which should be ruled by Christians, those who have a right and obligation to take it back for God so that it can be prosperous again.
One of the most influential and prominent Christian figures who has promoted this narrative is David Barton, President and Founder of WallBuilders (and a man who believes that progressive income tax is unbiblical because Israel didn’t have such a policy). Barton is the owner of a huge collection of historical documents and has written numerous books on the subject of church and state and the founding fathers. However, Barton is not actually a trained historian, but an amateur who has made living off of promoting a particular narrative to a group of people who were desperate to hear that narrative. Barton’s popularity among conservative politicians and Christians is impressive, which is why he is important to talk about. For example, Kirk Cameron recently interviewed David Barton for his movie, Monumental, which I will probably discuss next week in my column.
Last week, Glenn Beck had David Barton on his show to discuss the Christianity of Thomas Jefferson and specifically the Jefferson Bible. The clip was posted on The Blaze, where readers quickly drew the assumption that the Federal Government was using the Public Schools to brainwash our kids about the Founding Fathers.
As you will see, Barton is either very deceptive or incredibly ignorant, and in either case he is not a man that Christians should be relying on for a historical justification of their political movement. If we desire to be a witness in our culture, we must stand by the standards of honesty, truth, and love that are basic to our faith. Which means that when we see figures like Barton spreading falsehood, we need to call them for what they are.
If the purpose of the book was only to offer Christ’s moral teachings, Jefferson would have had no reason to describe his birth, childhood, or death, as he does. Barton also doesn’t mention that when most people discuss the “Jefferson Bible,” including the Smithsonian, they have the second book in mind, not the first. I was unable to find any copies of the “Philosophy of Jesus of Nazareth” online, but the latter “Bible” can be seen on the Smithsonian website. And as you can see, Jefferson’s Bible ends without the resurrection. Barton dismisses as ignorant fools those who repeat the liberal lie that Jefferson cut out all the miracles from the Bible, and then when he discusses The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth–the text people refer to as the “Jefferson Bible”–he repeatedly insists that the book was about “morals,” as if it were wisdom literature, rather than a narrative, minus Christ’s divinity.
Barton’s story that the Smithsonian has deliberately manipulated the historical facts to deny Jefferson’s faith fits nicely with the narrative that we are the True Heritage of our nation’s Founding Fathers and secularists and Muslims are interlopers. But the truth is much more complicated and ugly than that, as this case shows.
The ugly truth is that in this clip, Barton is either deceptive or incredibly ignorant (I don’t want to say he lies because he might sue me; no, really, that’s happened). And there’s good reason to believe that Barton is wrong about a great deal else (See this Examiner piece, or this LA Times article, or Wikipedia’s section on his criticism, or this Facebook Page on Jefferson).
As Christians we must be fervent for the truth, and so when someone like Barton who claims to be speaking for us influences conservative politicians and seeks to promote a certain political ideology and is clearly wrong, we need to speak out, otherwise what will our witness be?
Next week, I’ll take a look at how this same narrative of history is promoted by Kirk Cameron in his movie, Monumental.