Who Would Jesus Glitter Bomb?

For starters, I’ll apologize for not including my usual images and links. I poured an entire glass of red wine on my laptop last night, and so I am blogging from my iPad. Yes, I know, a true yuppie problem. So you’ll get text-only today AND LIKE IT!!!

Now that I got that out of my system…

It’s kind of like catching dead fish in a kiddie pool to go on the offensive any more against Westboro Baptist Church, brainchild of Fred Phelps. The small but headline-grabbing group is infamous for picketing everything from military funnerals to Whitney Houston’s memorial service, generally because they make some connection between the subject of protest and the affirmation (or even indirect tolerance) of homosexuality.

In a lot of ways, they are a caricature of themselves. They’re no longer worth the ink to dissect. However, they do have more insidious agenda, whereby they verbally provoke people they’re protesting until, hopefully, someone physically assaults them. Then they turn around and sue the people, thus helping to fund their ministry.

Peace of Christ be with you, right?

The Phelps mob showed up a few years ago at our denomination’s general assembly in Kansas City, apparently because some of our churches are led by LGBT ministers. One of the protesters even called me a name, and thankfully my wife, Amy, encouraged me to walk away rather than engage.

Talk about a Better Half.

Anyway, the Disciples youth in attendance at our gathering decided to offer their own peaceful counter-protest. They stood across the street from the Westboro folks and sang songs. That was it. But it made quite an impact on me.

That, in a nutshell, is notviolent resistance at its best, demonstrated to the rest of us by our kids.

Did it change thhe hearts or minds of any of Phelps’ followers? Who knows. But it clearly affected me, or I wouldn’t be writing about it eight years later.

I’ve written before about how we’re called to nonviolent but active engagement as Christians, and how much I appreciate Walter Wink’s explication of why and how this is done, at least in some instances. But it seems that we often suffer from a deficit of the imagination when it comes to responding to injustice, oppression or violence, resorting either to responding in kind, or doing nothing at all.

Enter the GLITTER BOMB.

There’s a movement afoot in recent months to confront those who speak publicly about intolerance, particularly in the case of our LGBT brothers and sisters. The idea is simple but brilliant. The protesters appear at a public event where they will know press will be there to document the stunt, and they shower the object of their protest with glitter. It’s completely harmless and actually pretty funny, but it’s also hard to get off.

It’s harder to be taken seriously when you’re Newt Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty or Rick Santorum, speaking about preserving traditional marriage and moral virtues while covered in glitter.

Now, I should note hhere that glitter bombing technically can be categorized as assault. However, few if any charges have ever been filed, partly because it would be a little embarrassing to explain in court, and they would also have the onus of proving there was specific intent to harm on the part of the glitter bombers.

Glitter bombing has not been limited to social conservatives either. Gay activist blogger Dan Savage has been glitter bombed more than once for what some consider to be unfair biases against the transgender cdommunity. Though I have to think a little bit of the effect is lost, as Savage admittedly does look fabulous covered in the shiny stuff.

Personally, I would love to hear Walter Wink’s own thoughts on glitter bombing asw an effective tool of nonviolent protest. It seems to meet all of his criteria based on his understanding of Jesus’ call to action:

No one is hurt.

It grabs attention without doing damage to property or person.

It helps point out the absurdity of the issue from the perspective of the protesters. In a sense, it serves to disarm the negative power of those seeking to withhold rights from others based on their orientation.

Maybe churches should consider glitter bomb squads to confront larger issues of injustice in their communities. I mean, why limit it to issues of sexual orientation? Just ask yourself the quuestion:

Who would Jesus glitter bomb?

About Christian Piatt

Christian Piatt is the creator and editor of BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE and BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS. He co-created and co-edits the “WTF: Where’s the Faith?” young adult series with Chalice Press, and he has a memoir on faith, family and parenting being published in early 2012 called PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date.

  • http://www.thebiblespeakstoyou.com/ James Early

    Jesus simply bombed people with truth.  

  • http://www.area-f.ca LadyIslay

    I might be remembering things incorrectly, but wasn’t Jesus usually against flashy public displays? Sure, there was the cleansing of the temple, the Transfiguration and that massive angel chorus, but he also told people to keep quiet about things and even refused to perform miracles. His Resurrection took place with no one around to see it. His miracles just happened without a flash or a bang or a puff of smoke. No, I don’t think he’d be much into glitter bombing.

    • http://lifebeforethebucket.blogspot.com/ Adrian Waller

      Jesus was against flashy public displays of piety. And I don’t know about you, but I haven’t ever seen “glitter bombing” as an act of the pious anywhere in the Bible.

  • http://lifebeforethebucket.blogspot.com/ Adrian Waller

    I just noticed you have about a million tags on your posts. Crazy.

    Anyway, I’m thinking Jesus would most likely glitterbomb some churches (besides Westboro). Ya know, the “normal” ones. Because I don’t think that’s the kind of normalcy he desires from his Bride (ya know, the “I hate flaming liberals and anyone associates with them” kind of normalcy).

  • http://www.LifeAfterCaregiving.WordPress.com/ Linda Brendle

    I don’t think Jesus would be glitter bombing anyone. It may not hurt physically, but making someone look ridiculous is a type of violence in itself. If the object of protest is so completely wrong, they will eventually make themselves look a lot more ridiculous than a handful of glitter will.

  • Christian Piatt

    I would encourage folks to read Walter Wink’s “Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way,” as it is the basis for the article.

    As for the “Messianic Secret” in the gospels, my understanding is that didn’t have to deo with humility ofr keeping things secret, but rather, his miracles ofr healing were aqcts of compassion, never used to prove his divinity. He wanted people to come to know who he was through his teaching, and not his miracles.

    After al, Jesus wasw content speaking before crowds of thousands.

  • Christian Piatt

    I would also suggest Jesus often answers question from the Pharisees in ways that put them in a no-win situation. They ended up looking foolish more than once when sparring with him.

  • Frank

    Who would Jesus glitter bomb?

    No one! He would never do anything to make himself look so foolish and childish.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X