Word of the Day: Shermer’s Law

Christianity and atheism clash againI propose “Shermer’s Law” for this observation by Michael Shermer: “Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for non-smart reasons.”1

This observation makes an important distinction between (1) how someone came to their beliefs and (2) how they later defend those beliefs.  People often come to their beliefs for poor reasons—for example, they may be racist or religious simply because they were raised in that environment.

Few will admit as an adult, “Oh, yeah—I don’t believe that for any better reason than that I was steeped in that environment, and I’m now just an unthinking reflection of that environment.”  Instead, they use their intellect (much more formidable now that they’re an adult) to marshal a defense of their beliefs.  The belief comes first, and the defense comes after.  And this isn’t just to save face with an antagonist; it’s to save face with themselves.

We can come up with a defense for just about anything.  It may not be a very good defense, but it’s something, and it may be sufficient to avoid cognitive dissonance (“Surely I believe this for a good reason, right??”).  The smarter you are, the better the defense you will come up with.

All of us do this, and (this may be consolation) the smartest people can do it more spectacularly than the rest of us.  Isaac Newton wasted time in alchemy, Nobel laureate Linus Pauling in vitamin C research, and Nobel laureate William Shockley in eugenics.

No one’s immune, but this is common in Christians who cobble together rationalizations for their beliefs.  “In for a penny, in for a pound” is easier than taking a step back to soberly consider the logic of the beliefs.  And the smarter the Christian, the better they can defend groundless beliefs.

Try to uncover this by asking, “You’re giving me an argument for Christianity, but is this what convinced you?  If not, why don’t you give me the argument that made you a Christian?”

Photo credit: Wikimedia

1 Michael Shermer, Why People Believe Weird Things (Freeman, 2002), p. 283.

Related posts:

Related links:

Morality’s Ruby Slippers
Principle of Analogy
Rationalizing Away the “Canaanite Problem” (2 of 2)
Genetic and Ad Hominem Fallacies
About Bob Seidensticker
  • evodevo

    No, sorry, the trinity meme grew out of the 300 year theological disagreement over the nature of Christ – fish or fowl, spirit or flesh – that resulted in countless massacres, banishments, pogroms, etc. among the various Christian sects between ~100 AD and the Nicene Council. It was a jury-rigged compromise designed to bring together disparate parts of nascent Christianity before they all annihilated each other. However, the arguments continued clear down to the appearance of Islam, when an outside force served to unite the warring factions. (See
    Jenkins’ Jesus Wars).
    It STILL doesn’t make any sense.

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined Bob Seidensticker

      The Trinity is a mystery, brother. You just need stronger faith.

      It’ll all make sense when you take the Bible Mysteries class in heaven. It’ll probably be taught by Paul.

      Or not.