Is this really what we’re coming to?
A person who objects to same-sex “marriage” cannot refuse to provide services for such a marriage, but must keep his or her moral convictions private even if they seem to implicate him or her in an immoral act. However, after he or she has provided those services, the person who has received those services can decide not to pay for them, on the grounds that the person’s private moral convictions have tainted those services:
I’m hoping and expecting that the lesbian couple in question at least returned the ring(s). But I don’t know that for certain.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In