Too many men: the shocking effects of abortion in Asia

A new study out of Canada paints a grim picture:

Abortions of female fetuses have led to a massive surplus of young unmarried men in India and China, raising fears of an outcast group that could threaten the social fabric, a study said Monday.

The trend took root in the 1980s when ultrasound technologies made it easier for families to detect fetal sex early and to abort if it was not what the parents desired, said the analysis in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Sons have traditionally been preferred over daughters in many parts of China, India and South Korea due to social, cultural and financial motivations. Sex-selective abortion is outlawed but can be difficult to enforce.

The phenomenon was first spotted in South Korea in the early 1990s, when the sex ratio at birth (SRB) – typically 105 male births to every 100 female births – rose to 125 in some cities.

Similar rises in male births were seen in China, “complicated by the one-child policy, which has undoubtedly contributed to the steady increase in the reported SRB from 106 in 1979, to 111 in 1990, 117 in 2001 and 121 in 2005,” said the study.

India has seen “sex ratios as high as 125 in Punjab, Delhi and Gujarat in the north but normal sex ratios of 105 in the southern and eastern states of Kerala and Andhra Pradesh,” it added.

In parts of China where a second child is allowed, after a daughter is the first born, the SRB for the second is 143, suggesting that many choose to abort a second girl fetus in favor of trying again for a boy.

Estimates of China’s actual population difference in 2005 pointed to 1.1 million excess males, with men under 20 exceeding the number of females by around 32 million, said the study led by Therese Hesketh, University College London Centre for International Health and Development.

“These men will be unable to marry, in societies where marriage is regarded as virtually universal, and where social status and acceptance depend, in large part, on being married and creating a new family,” said the authors.

Referred to in China as “guang gun,” meaning “bare branches,” these men are presumed to be unable to bear fruit by coupling and raising a family.

“In China and parts of India the sheer numbers of unmated men are a further cause for concern,” said the study.

Read more.

Comments

  1. pagansister says:

    Common sense would dictate that if there are no more females, there will be no more males! DUH! Guess the folks in the mentioned countries aren’t using any common sense!!!!!

  2. As far as the population-control authorities in China are concerned, the preference for boys is not a bug but a feature. If you have a 1/2-billion men and a 1/2-billion women, and you let them have 1 child each and they let nature take its course, then in the next generation you have 250 million couples each caring for 1 child and 4 parents. But if the couples “make their own luck” by offing their daughters, you get something more like 210 million daughters and 280 million sons. Which turns into 210 million couples each caring for 1 child and 4 parents, and 70 million permanently single men taking care of their parents. In just one generation, you cut the population by another 40 million past the “one family one child” policy alone.

    China is facing a demographic train wreck — a billion very poor people facing old age in a culture where the daughter-in-law is designated as their caregiver.

  3. Tony in Central PA says:

    Some have argued this was an intended effect of the One Child policy all along. What does a nation do with many millions of unattached males ? I’m hoping the priesthood opens up in China to bring something good out of this bad situation. The other option would be a very large expansion of China’s military, which has already been happening.

  4. Tony, I think you are fooling yourself that these men are “unattached”. They may not be attached to wives, but the reason that the Chinese prefer boys is that it is the son’s responsibility to care for his parents in their old age. In the past, that has meant that he finds a wife and she does it, but without a wife he still has the obligation. Those aging single men are first going to care for their grandparents and then their parents.

    The irony, of course, is that Mao’s policy was “every mouth to feed comes with two hands to work”, but it is really only in capitalist economies that human beings are almost always valuable assets rather than liabilities.

Leave a Comment


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X