Al Qaeda to Iran: Darn Tootin’ We Done It!

Remember that scene in A Few Good Men, where Colonel Jessup, his pride having conquerd his instinct for self-preservation, screams, “YOU’RE DAMN RIGHT I ORDERED A CODE RED ON [WHATEVER THAT KID'S NAME WAS]“? Well, it looks like Al-Qaeda has reached that point, with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the role of Lieutenant Kaffee.

In response to Ahmadinejad’s address to the U.N., in which he called the September 11th attacks “mysterious,” and urged investigation into “unknown elements involved,” an official al-Qaeda organ felt moved to, well, refudiate him.. An editorial in the latest issue of Inspire, the English-language magazine put out by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP, the organization’s Yemeni affiliate asks: “Why would Iran ascribe to such a ridiculous belief [in U.S. governmental responsibility] that stands in the face of all logic and evidence?”

This turns out to be a rhetorical question. The editors answer it themselves:
“al Qaeda was a competitor [with Iran] for the hearts and minds of the disenfranchised Muslims around the world. Al Qaeda… succeeded in what Iran couldn’t. Therefore it was necessary for the Iranians to discredit 9/11 and what better way to do so? Conspiracy theories.”

In Yahoo! News, Laura Rozen points out that this exchange recalls a
gag newscast
that appeared on Onion News back in 2008. That’s funny enough. As for me, I won’t be satsidfied until some very old, very honest Nazi crawls out of the Brazilian jungle and denounces Ahmadinejad and Hutton Gibson as a pair of lying Schwein.

9/11 and Bleacher Bum’s Envy

Several weeks after 9/11, my friend and I went skydiving for the first and only time in our lives. As it happened, the airstrip was about 30 miles southeast of Phoenix, on a brown, scrubby patch of desert within sight of some half-dozen gnarled buttes. Give or take 15,000 feet, it could have been Afghanistan — at least to people who, like the two of us, knew the country only from the occasional wide-angle shot on CNN.

Neither of us would have admitted as much at the time, but we undertook this plunge into a mockup war theater as a form of therapy, a restorative game of cops and robbers. If we could not actually help avenge America by going after bin Laden, we could at least tend to our own consciences by pretending we were going after bin Laden.

Over the past few days, 9/11 survivors’ stories have blanketed the internet like ash from the fallen Towers. Salon promises “9/11 Stories We’ve Never Told Anyone” from three women who were attending school in Lower Manhattan during the attacks, and who later bonded over the experience. That’s fairly tame stuff compared with the residents of Rockaway, in Queens, who, according to the New York Times, are still actively mourning the 59 of their neighbors — mostly firefighters — who died that day. On the Deacon’s Bench, Greg Kandra posts a link to the homily delivered by Fr. Michael Duffy at the funeral of Fr. Michael Judge. It’s soul-stirring stuff; placed in the mouth of another Fr. Duffy, it could have fit perfectly into the script of the Fighting Sixty-Ninth.

Reading these stories triggers all the prescribed reactions: rage at the attackers, sorrow over the slain, reverence for those who acquitted themselves heroically, nostalgia for the certainties of the pre-9/11world. But it also triggers something else, an emotion as senseless as it is unseemly. That emotion is envy.

“What if they threw a war and nobody came?” asked a dovish slogan dating back to the days of the Vietnam War. Whenever I am unwise enough to dwell on the events of 9/11 without sheathing my mind in Kevlar, they seem to answer a very different question: “What if they threw a national disaster and nobody invited you?”

Childish this may be, but I can’t believe it’s uncommon. Shakespeare has King Hal promise his men, grumpy over having to face superior odds at Agincourt: “And gentlemen in England now a-bed /Shall think themselves accursed they were not here.” At least in my case, the poison on that dagger is the part about being “a-bed.” Thanks to the time difference between Phoenix and New York, I was very literally a-bed when both towers were struck. They were already on the point of collapse when my girlfriend called with the news.

“Just wanted to FYI you, honey,” she said, adding, somewhat inaccurately, “they just bombed the World Trade Center.”

Remembering Ramzi Youssef, I mumbled back, “Don’t worry. They do that every once in awhile.” Shakespeare might have added that the last gentlemen to get the dish, and assign it its proper importance, will think themselves most accursed of all.

My mother’s boyfriend works at Columbia University, in Morningside Heights, far from Ground Zero. My mother herself teaches at NYU — in Lower Manhattan, but still comfortably out of danger. Yet even they managed to be part of the happening, and in a way that pressed another bruise. The son of one of my mother’s colleagues disappeared when one of the Towers fell. Months later, when he was declared dead, she and her boyfriend both attended the memorial service. There, they saw the dead man’s girlfriend — or perhaps she’d been his fiancee — arrive wearing what my scandalized mother described as “a black minidress and Keith Hernandez.” Like the Titantic, like the Lusitania, like the first Ypres, which snuffed out battalions of “pals” –public-school boys fighting as gentlemen rankers — 9/11 affected, to an unusual degree, the comparatively fortunate.

In the same speech, Henry V promises his enlisted men: “For he to-day that sheds his blood with me/Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile/This day shall gentle his condition.” A lovely thought, Messire, but nobody in Manhattan needs much gentrification. Even those who lived in North Jersey or the boroughs — the cops, the firefighters, the dishwashers at Windows on the World — would qualify as the stoutest sort of yeomen. If they were really vile, they’d be living in Phoenix and cold-calling for a debt-consolidation agency, as I was.

What do you do when you’re declasse and barred from the ball? Taking the shilling would have been tempting, but it takes lenses of 16.5 diopters to correct my vision to 20/30. The army would have had scant use for me, except as a bayonet dummy. One of my grad-school friends covered himself in glory in Afghanistan as a Newsweek correspondent. But then, he was a native Farsi speaker. I did begin teaching myself Arabic, in the hope of landing a job with some alphabet agency, but dropped the project on the suspicion that something — maybe my low credit rating, maybe a misdemeanor trespassing charge — would disqualify me. It was right around the time Jessica Lynch became a household name that I realized my services in making this segment of history were simply not required.

Of course, history is also an armchair sport. For the audience, there’s always a temptation toward a compensatory hawkishness. One happy victim was Tubby Chesterton, who wrote of war as a practical exercise in Christian virtue though his own physique would have beggared Gunnery Sergeant Hartmann’s powers of derision. There’s also a temptation toward the opposite vice, a self-justifying dovishness. In Of Paradise and Power, Robert Kagan writes, of demilitarized European nations and their evaluation of security threats, “When you don’t have a hammer, you don’t want anything to look like a nail.” The same can be true of unmilitary individuals: anyone who wants to can become a Europe of one.

Miraculously, I managed to avoid either extreme. Like many Americans, I viewed the War o Terror with a nervous pragmatism, initially supporting the invasion of Iraq, feeling disgusted by the unworthiness at Abu Ghraib and thrilled at the re-capture of Fallujah, losing faith around 2005, but regaining it after the surge. Now, a year after the drawdown in Iraq, and with no obviously reachable goals left in Afghanistan, I am comfortably numb.

That being the case, it’s frankly amazing that remembering the events of 10 years ago can snap me out of my stupor. Whatever I’ve learned — or have tried to learn — about global power or its logical limits feels abstract, even spectral. It is about as viscerally satisfying as the chemical equation for water. What feels as palpable as water itself is the desire to been present at an important event, even a horrible one. I wonder whether it will console those who were marked for life by the attacks to know that some of the unmarked, against all reason, still reproach themselves for not having fought on St. Crispin’s Day.

City of Veronicas

Of all the Church’s dubious pious traditions, my favorite is the story of the Veronica Veil. According to the Acts of Pilate, while Jesus was being goaded and driven to Calvary, under the weight of His Cross, a woman stepped forward and mopped His face with her veil. Miraculously, the face’s image was transferred to the fabric. She later brought the veil to Rome, where it cured the Emperor Tiberias.

The name “Veronica,” which appears in the text, is a Latinized version of the Greek name “Berenike,” or “bearer of victory” — rendered hideously in English as “Bernice.” However, the Catholic Encyclopedia says that the name began as a portmanteau of the Latin words “vera icona,” or “true image,” and referred to the relic of the veil before settling on the person. Whatever its derivation, “Veronica” works better than “Betty.”

If this is balderdash, then it’s the Belvedere of balderdash — a story so good that it ought to be true even if it isn’t. Veronica’s character shows real consistency, especially considering Acts of Pilate identifies her as the woman who, according to Luke, cured her hemorrhages with her faith, and by touching the hem of Jesus’ robe. Quite a gutsy dame, is Veronica. Her faith drives her ever forward — into action, and perhaps, into trouble. Whenever she sees something that needs doing — whether it’s healing herself, swabbing the Messiah’s burning brow, or witnessing to the ruler of the civilized world — she goes for it.

It’s fun to note that Nike — the Greek word for “victory,” which appears it Veronica’s name — tells consumers: “Just do it.” This could have been Veronica’s own motto. In bullfighting, a type of matador’s pass is called a “veronica” — yes, named after the valiant lady of Jerusalem. The bull, like the Lamb, ends up getting his face wiped.

What makes Veronica’s story plausible is the fact that people really do act that way, performing sudden acts of courage and charity. September 11 abounded with those episodes. In the New York Times, Jim Dwyer calls it “an hour of human decency.” He tells of how a man named Keating Crown, injured by the impact of the second plane and forced to hobble down 78 flights on a broken leg, met a stranger, who tore a strip off his shirt and bandaged one of his wounds. Dwyer continues:

If humankind had an army, that bloody cloth on Keating Crown’s head could have flown as its flag, and that stranger on the Bowery would have been its quartermaster.

Between 14,000 and 17,000 people in the towers, old and young, fat and fit, able-bodied and not, marshaled themselves into evacuations that were undirected, unrehearsed and orderly. A firm hand on an elbow, giving strength to wobbly legs. A soothing voice that said chemotherapy was hard but these are just stairs and you can do it. The double-file line of strangers that folded into a single line to make way for someone who had to get down first.

I had my own Veronica moment on September 11. Characteristically, it was minor and entirely PC. I was working at the worst of my post-grad school jobs, cold-calling for a debt consolidation agency. Since Phoenix is on Pacific Standard Time from April through October, we arrived at work some time after the Towers had come down. The company was small, and occupied a suite of offices in a converted motel that looked as seedy as the operation was in fact. I remember standing on the balcony, in front of the entrance, chain-smoking and wondering who could think about his debts with the whole world coming down around his ears.

The owner must have had his own debts in mind. When he came up the stairs, he boomed, in official tones, “ALL RIGHT, PEOPLE. YOU HEARD THE NEWS: NO MORE WORLD TRADE CENTER. NOW LET’S GET ON THE PHONES AND MAKE SOME CHEESE.” Our reluctance must have showed, because he added, in a more subdued voice, “If anyone gives you a hard time for bothering them during a time of national emergency, just tell them, ‘We have to get on with our lives, or else the terrorists win.’”

It was not a good business day. Each of us got a share of the rage that should rightfully have gone to Osama bin Laden. But then, that’s a salesman’s lot. The only civil encounter I had was with a man in Los Angeles who had an Arabic name. I’m not feeling very imaginative today, so I’ll call him “Muhammad.” On the surface, I delivered the standard pitch; he raised objections, which I answered. He agreed to the deal; I confirmed his contact information and took his credit card number. A slam dunk, as far as those things went.

But there was a powerful subtext. Though Muhammad’s voice was steady, it sounded hollow. It was obvious that events of that day had bruised his soul, no less than they had those of the people who called us traitors and parasites, and claimed to have bedded our parents. I got the impression that, for him, paying $400 to have his credit ruined was a pledge of allegiance, a proof of loyalty to America and her economy. By maintaining a casual tone, by speaking his name with no hostile accents, I tried to reassure him that the American tradition of pluralism would hold firm. There would be no internments, no pogroms, just a call back from our verifications department and a charge on his Discover.

The son of a bitch ended up cancelling his order. No matter — the whole week was slow. I wouldn’t have earned above my hourly in any case. What I did get — what Muhammad and I both got — was a human encounter, a moment of understated tenderness to last us through the worst day of the decade.

Not quite a face-wiping or a wound-bandaging, but not bad for long-distance.