Foreskin Man: Peeling Back the Mystery

Product of a real, live anti-Semite
A vigilant reader has informed me that I was entirely wrong in supposing that Foreskin Man, the comic put out by San Francisco circumcision opponents, was someone’s bad idea of meta-humor. The artist, Matthew Hess, is a real person of real German ancestry — not, as I had hoped, a Jewish prankster who named himself after a Nazi for a lark.

Debra Saunders of the San Francisco Chronicle interviewed Hess. The interview is brief, but still revealing:

UPDATE:I spoke with Matthew Hess of Foreskinman.com this morning. I asked him if the comic is anti-Semitic. He answered, “A lot of people have said that, but we’re not trying to be anti-Semitic. We’re trying to be pro-human rights.”

The “next issue will deal with a different kind of circumcision.”

And he gave me permission to post material from the site.

Not anit-Semitic, but pro-human rights, huh? Well, now we know anti-circumcision activists can be just as mealy-mouthed as any other activists. I also have to wonder just what other kind of circumcision Foreskin Man is going to tackle in the next issue. Having taken down Monster Mohel, will he go after the Malevolent Mullah?

My reader made a point which I think valid. He said I had dismissed evidence that failed to jibe with the picture of the world I’d formed already. I had figured that anti-Semitism — at least of the overt, Nazi-like kind that Hess is plugging — was confined to the margins of America’s political dialogue. Sure, some far-leftists’ support for Palestine might evolve into a hatred of the so-called Israel lobby, but they’d have little to gain by banning circumcision. Sure, Jesse Jackson and Cornel West might pop off at the Jews every once in a while, but they would not expect any Aryan to avenge them; they’ve got serious Aryan issues of their own.

When I read that Hess and his friends call themselves “inactivists,” my heart broke a little. That’s clever, damn it. Urbanites who are clever enough to come up with a name like that and geeky enough to draw passable comics have no business disliking Jews. If anything, they should BE Jews. But now I realize I’m stuck in the New York of my childhood. It’s whole ugly new ball game out there.

My reader also warns of a new breed of anti-Semite I couldn’t have dreamed up in a million years:

In this instance, I think it’s yet a third kind of acceptable anti-Semitism, a little-known one yet one that is persistent especially in California: Gay activist anti-Semitism. A certain subset of gays are strong “uncut” proponents and want all penises to have foreskins because they prefer them that way, and so try to force the world to comply; when they get the biggest pushback from Jewish groups, their frustration turns to hatred.

I have no idea if he’s right. (I certainly don’t pretend to know anything about Matthew Hess’s sexual orientation.) But if he is — wow. Isn’t anti-Semitism supple? Isn’t it versatile? It slices, it dices, it makes Julienne fries! Historically, it’s proven able to provide a solution and an explanation for anything, even mediocre sex. Speaking from the Jewish side of my family, I quote the Scots: Whae’s like us? Damn few, an’ they’re a’ deid.

UPDATE: It’s occurred to me that some readers may not understand what’s so anti-Semitic about Hess’s portrayal of Monster Mohel and his band of no-goodniks. In a way, that’s a good thing — it suggests ancient slanders and stereotypes have fallen so far out of common use as to look new. Well, sorry to break it to everyone, but there’s nothing new under the sun — especially not the act of depicting Jews as ugly, hook-nosed ruthless monsters who harm children.

Here’s a poster from Der Ewiger Jude, or the Eternal Jew, a 1940 Nazi propaganda film:

Here’s one from Jud Suss, or Suss the Jew, which came out the same year:

I wish I could say these stereotyped images began with the Nazis, but they didn’t; they’re much older. Here’s a fresco from St. Paul’s church in Sandomierz, Poland:

The Nazis weren't that original.

No, they’re not circumcising the kid; they’re about to kill him and pour his blood into their Passover matzoh. Will Hess be able to top that in his next issue? We’ll just have to wait and see.

UPDATE: For an object lesson in how propagandists use distorted images to demonize their enemies, here’s an engraving of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer, the man whose life formed the basis of the movie Jud Suss:

Doesn’t look very foreign or very threatening, does he?

The Mystery of Foreskin Man

Tatler of Pajamas Media claims to have found proof that behind San Francisco’s proposed circumcision ban lurks the blue-eyed monster: 19th-and 20th-century race-based anti-Semtism, the philosophy that brought you the Final Solution.

The smoking chimney, so to speak, is an indie comic book, allegedly circulated as “campaign literature.” The eponymous hero, Foreskin Man, battles a gang of fanatical orthodox Jews led by Monster Mohel, whose goal, apparently, is to seal the Abrahamic covenant with every child in the world, whether or not its parents approve.

Now, I’ll admit, Tatler makes a pretty good prima facie case. All the tropes of Nazi propaganda appear to be in ordnung. Foreskin Man is one of those blond Ubermensch types that Jesse Owens ate for breakfast. (Indeed, had the comic come out 20 years earlier, its film adaptation would have given Dolf Lundgren the role of a lifetime.) Monster Mohel and his henchmenschen could have been extras in The Eternal Jew. They’ve got that whole Shylock-on-meth look: shaggy beards and peyot, hooked noses, maniacal gleams in their beady eyes.

And yet, for me, it doesn’t quite add up.

Anti-Semitism has been called the oldest hatred, and I have no doubt it’ll always be around — somewhere, in some form. But if it’s re-emerged and metastasized in a major American urban center, I have a hard time believing it would take the form suggested by the tropes in this comic.

Let me put it another way: I can think of two types of anti-Semitism that might find a warm reception in a left-leaning cosmopolitan city. The first is the anti-Semitism of a disaffected urban underclass, or as I like to call it, Hymietown anti-Semitism, in honor of the Reverend Jesse Jackson. But even that doesn’t really fit. To take root, Hymietown anti-Semitism requires: 1) a visible Jewish elite; and 2) poor people who hate its guts. Look, I know San Francisco only as a very occasional visitor, so I’m willing to be proven wrong here, but I’ve never gotten the impression that Jews make up a very large, very visible, or very dominant group. For that matter, I don’t remember seeing too many poor people. Weren’t they all fed to the sea lions back in the 1980s?

Also, Hymietown anti-Semitism, at least in its original form, was the intellectual property of people of color. If Foreskin Man were their champion, he would not look as he does. He’d be a lot darker, for one thing, and would probably have a name like The Black Python.

The other type is what I like to call Israel-Bashing Gone Wild. Right-wing supporters of Israel exaggerate the frequency with which their opponents on the Left slip into bona fide Jew-hatred, but it does happen. I can see this becoming popular in San Francisco, particularly among academic types. But it would make no sense for rabid Israel-bashers to ban circumcision. Muslims, including Palestinian Muslims, circumcise their children, too. You’d think some representative of the Muslim community would tell them, “Listen, guys, thanks, but no thanks.”

No, I’m betting Foreskin Man is someone’s idea of meta-humor — a form of satire that mocks at stereotypes by invoking them in an exaggerated way. South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have dined out on this for almost fifteen years, first packing Kyle Broflovski off to Jewleeard, and later transforming Barbara Streisand into a giant mechanical monster known as the Kiken. Mr. Hess, Foreskin Man’s creator, looks to me like their heir. The name “Hess” (as in Rudolf Hess, the top Nazi who deserted to England in 1941) is probably a pseudonym, calculated to stir the pot. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if the artist turns out to be a Cohen or a Moskowitz. Every Jew knows by heart the pejorative images he deploys; most American gentiles would have to crack open the history books to find them.

But here’s the thing about meta-humor. In many instances, there’s nothing meta about it. The humorist isn’t really mocking stereotypes; he’s milking them for whatever juice they’ve got left. So, to Hess, whoever he is, I leave the following Yiddish curse involving his favorite body part:

Zol dir lign in keyver der eyver, in der kishkes a lokh mit a sheyver.

(“May your penis rest in a grave; may a hole and a hernia lie in your guts.”)

So there.

The Circumcision Flap

My father almost declined to have me circumcised. What his misgivings were I’m not sure. Fear of unpleasant medical side effects might have played a part — he tended to obsess over physical health to a degree my mother said was characteristically Jewish (though in this case, paradoxically so).

But I’m tempted to think they had even more to do with his queasiness about Judaism itself, his uncertainly regarding his place in the whole grand tradition. My dad never pretended to be anything but Jewish — a wise move, since he was never one of those Jewish guys who could pass for Andalusian or Abruzzese; it was his fate to wear the map of Anatevka on his face. But for him, Jewish identity was less a source of pride than — pardon the expression — a cross to be borne. Three-fifths of his wives were gentiles, each arguably more archetypal than the last. My mother was familiar fare — the type of working-class ethnic he might have gone to school with. Her successor, on the other hand, was bona fide WASP, and an Episcopalian, to boot. Next came a Texan with family roots in Normandy, cradle of the British class system. Short of marrying Daisy Duke or Brunhilde he couldn’t have picked a more exotic specimen.

Perhaps he thought leaving my ding-a-ling in its original wrapper would help me score with the blondies when my time came. On Forbes.com, Richard Hyfler writes that Jewish men’s oldest sexual insecurity relates to the foreskin and its absence. In Peretz Pntschik’s play Yiddishe Tereisias, or”The Jewish Teresias,” a traveling salesman named Tsurik wonders whether it was it was his missing schmegeggi that drove his wife to cuckold him with a Cossack:

he reminds himself that if Susan slept with Zyosha, he will never be able to win her back, quoting Bereshit Rabba (the midrash on Genesis) to the effect that it is hard for a woman who has slept with an uncircumcised man to separate from him.

In other words, since the compilation of the Midrash, and possibly before that, Jewish men have been living with their own version of “Once you go black, you’ll never go back” — “When you really want to make it, find you a sheygets,” or more simply, “Be a goy toy.” This would be an agonizing thought under any circumstance; added to all the other Jewish anxieties regarding Gentiles, it must have been utterly intolerable. Not only will your goyische neighbor raze your temple, convince the world you like to commit ritual murder, and have you sucking Zyklon B like it’s cool, he’ll steal your girl. And if your girl’s Jewish, then her kid will be one, too, which means you might end up in a minyan with the little creep and have to make nice.

Translate that into Yiddish, and it would make one honey of a curse.

For all circumcision’s disadvantages, real and alleged, the overwhelming majority of Jews have continued to practice it. If it falls out of favor in the general culture — and San Francisco’s proposed ban, up for votes this November, places that within the realm of possibility — then it will once again be what it was to begin with: a mark of tribal membership. In all my life, I’ve had exactly one opportunity to see circumcision in these terms, and it came during a visit to my Jewish ancestral homeland.

This meant not Israel but to Moscow. In the strictest sense, that’s no more an ancestral homeland than Taiwan; the Lindenman family hails from the western Ukraine. Still, it was considerably closer than Phoenix, and in any case, I was there less as a Jew — or a partial Jew — than an American Russophile. Pushkin and Lermontov meant more to me than Isaac Bashevis Singer or even Isaac Babel.

That’s how it started out, anyway. I hadn’t been there a week when I started believing in race memory — that is, recollections that are literally bred into the human genone. The Russians I met were friendly enough. They tend to be very gracious to foreigners who take a sincere interest in their language and culture. My accomplishments in the art of binge drinking did nothing to alienate them, I’m sure. But some neck-hair-prickling instinct that I could not have done anything to acquire kept me on my toes, warned me not to get too comfortable.

It may have been some instinct for tempting fate that made me start spending my time in the one place where you can’t do anything but get comfortable. I refer to the nudist beach in Serebriyanyi Bor, an enormous park straddling the Moscow River. American nudists — or naturists, as many like to be called — are so determined to give their lifestyle a family-friendly image that their official literature takes a downright prudish tone on sex. Next to them, the Shakers and Essenes sound like bacchantes on spring break. Their Russian counterparts make no such scruples. In a way, that was unfortunate because it meant that everybody’s sexual politics got dumped, so to speak, into my lap.

Living as an expatriate in a much poorer country without giving anyone cause to hate your guts takes a certain finesse, and never more so than where mating is concerned. A sizable number of women will marry an orangutan, provided he can get her U.S. residency. Flaunt your unearned drawing power too openly, and the men will come to resent you. It doesn’t matter that whoever you take home will dump you as soon as she’s legally able; that’s three years of conjugal bliss that should rightfully have gone to a local boy. On the other hand, it doesn’t do to be completely aloof, either. People will take you for a snob. “What, our women aren’t good enough for Your Highness? Screw you, buddy.”

No, the only sensible approach is be polite to everyone, mention your girlfriend back home, and if you’ve got any religious scruples, allude to them like a madman.

I don’t think I’ve ever identified more strongly with the Jewish people than I did on that beach. Until lifestyle issues catch up with them, Russians are some of the most beautiful people in the world, and when I say beautiful, I mean beautiful in a distinctly un-Jewish way. No, there’s no shortage of attractive Jews But in none of my visits to Jones Beach did I notice quite so many Jewish men who answered to adjectives like strapping and golden, or quite so many Jewish women who could be called statuesque. Perhaps this has less to do with genes than with the priorities of the Soviet educational system, which was calibrated partly to produce paratroopers, champion gymnasts and ballerinas. In a chess tournament, the two groups would be in a dead heat.

It should go without saying that mine was one of two circumcised units on the beach (more on the other, and its owner, in a bit.). If anyone had recited me the Midrashic warning on the potency of the uncircumcised, I wouldn’t have doubted it for moment. The absense of a foreskin seemed to betoken some profounder absence of virility. This was Yiddishkeit, boiled down irreducibly: being Jewish meant being an underdog in the bag-off stakes. In Goodfellas, Ray Liotta didn’t win Lorraine Bracco by pistol-whipping her caddish suitor, or even by getting her a ringside table at the Copa. He had her at “My name is Henry Hill.” If he’d been Henry Hillel, he could have done no right.

Indeed, it might have been that deep sense of humility that enabled me to behave with the proper reserve, and by that token, saved me a beating. It happened that the other circumcised guy was a Chechen named Zakir. From tsarist times forward, Russia has dealt Chechnya enough misery for a country fifty times its size. Only a couple of weeks before my arrival in Moscow, the Khasav-Yurt Accord ended a war between the two nations that was starting — or so it seemed in the Western media — to turn genocidal. Perhaps for that reason, the Chechens I met in Moscow were among the surliest people I’ve ever met in my life. I’ve been to rough neighborhoods and gotten my share of hard stares, but nothing nearly so toxic as the vibes the Chechens gave off. If looks could kill, they could have marched all the way to Khabarovsk.

It would have been nice if Zakir and I could have bonded — one circumcised guy from an oppressed minority group to another. I learned we had more in common even than that: one of his parents was an ethnic Russian; we could have spent one of those endless Russian summer days swilling vodka and hashing out our identity crises. It was not to be. He took an instant and intense dislike to me. Why? Cherchez la femme. Her name was Yulia, a 39-year-old Joni Mitchell look-alike who had been a policewoman until some black marketeer shot her in the kneecap. At six-one, she towered over me by five inches and — owing to her bad leg — tended to lean on my shoulder as she walked.

There was nothing carnal between us. No, our relationship conformed to what for me has always been a familiar pattern: a chaste friendship enlivened on the one hand by an erotic undercurrent, and softened on the other by a certain filial-maternal dynamic. If I were Jewish enough to believe in psychoanalysis, I’d have plenty to say about that, I’m sure. For the moment, let it suffice that all these nuances were lost on Zakir. When he looked at me and Yuliya, he imagined some foreign hotshot was shacking up with a girl he liked.

Barring some false starts, Tsurik, the salesman, Peretz Pntschik’s hero, reacts to the loss of his honor in an essentially honorable way. He opens himself to the possibility that it was his physical and emotional unavailability, not the design of his penis, that drove his wife into another man’s arms. This is all very admirable and menschlike, and I’m sorry to say Zakir was having none of it. No, he had to be a big jerk about it. Without confronting me directly, he would rant on in a tiresome vein about how Americans made up a gryaznyi narod, or filthy race. As evidence, he brought up our tolerance of blacks and Mexicans, and of miscegenation.

Had I been in randy-young-buck mode, I might well have gotten up into his grill — I’ve done stupider things. And who knows where that would have led? It was clear that Zakir’s friends were embarrassed by his behavior, but then, he was the home team — at least on one side of his family. If a half-Jew and a half-Chechen come to blows over a woman, whose side would tribal loyalty demand they take? And what if both parties are naked? It was the kind of problem that would have driven Emily Post and Metternich plum out of their gourds.

In the end, my having been slightly gelded by the presence of so many Asgaardian-looking people had a positive effect on my judgment. It didn’t take a Midrashic commentator to see that Zakir’s racist rants represented the displacement of all the abuse his own minority status had earned him. Russians, in fact, refer to Chechens, along with other Caucasians, as chernozhopye, or “black-asses.” In a society where people where people wear their prejudices so proudly, everyone needs someone to pick on. If Americans filled that bill for Zakir — all right, I’d play the part. Whenever he went off, I’d throw him a quizzical look as if I couldn’t understand. (In fact, given Zakir’s awful Caucasian accent, I often couldn’t.)

And all because of a circumcised member. George Clinton liked to tell people: “Free your mind, your ass will follow.” Maybe if you Jewify the penis, the ehart follows. Stranger things have happened.

One final word. Zakir ended up going too far even for his friends. On my next-to-last day on the beach, a group of them picked him up, threw him on the ground, and sat on him until he calmed down. Looking at me, they nodded solemnly. According to a vulgar Russian idiom, which I can no longer remember word-for-word, “to crush hedgehogs with one’s bare buttocks” means to behave recklessly. These gentlemen had done something even braver with theirs: they’d crushed a Chechen.

So if I had sons, would I have them circumcised? Probably so. It certainly can lead to some rewarding cultural exchanges. And in any case, I’d hate to see them end up in the clutches of some back-alley mohel.