After Kateri, No More Flower Children

With a second miracle to her credit, Kateri Tekawitha’s 331-year wait for sainthood is finally over. It’s a great day for her and all the constituencies she represents, including Native Americans, women, laypeople, those suffering from facial deformities, Canadians and – I add with special pride – New Yorkers. Kateri’s birthplace, near present-day Auriesville in Montgomery County, isn’t exactly Gotham City. But then, in Kateri’s day, Manhattan wasn’t much more than a bedroom community, either.

I’m absolutely over the moon for her. I know that if I’d suffered like she suffered – from smallpox, from near-blindness, from living in a cultural environment hostile to my faith – I’d jolly well want the Academy to recognize my work. Seeing martyrs, visionaries, stigmatics and other flashier characters raised to the altars would pique me till my braids were standing on end. Some wag (I’m thinking St. Philip Neri) would take to calling me “Pippi Leatherstocking.”

Truth be told, that might not be so bad. The last thing the Church needs is another saint with a flower nickname – actually, in Kateri’s case, several flower nicknames. The inscription on her gravestone pronounces her “the fairest flower that ever bloomed among red men.” Her admirers have been improvising on this theme like jazz men ever since, with the result that Kateri now answers to “The Lily of the Mohawks,” the “Pure and Tender Lily,” the “Flower among True Men,” and the “Lily of Purity.” This veritable bouquet of sobriquets puts her on the same sideboard with the Little Flower of Jesus, the Lily of Corinaldo, the Rose of Lima, and of course, the Mystical Rose her own self.

Those are just the sacred buds that blossom in the hothouse of my mind at one in the morning – the full list must be longer. And yes, it could hardly be otherwise. Flowers have symbolized human qualities since long before Jesus held forth on the lilies of the field, or Solomon on roses among thorns. The Greeks believed that when Hera was nursing one of Zeus’ rare legitimate kids, half of her milk spilled out. Part spilled into the sky, forming the Milky Way; part spilled to earth, forming white trumpet lilies. Through this myth, the flowers came to represent motherhood and fertility. If Attic mommy bloggers had existed, the ones who railed against ewe’s milk would probably have given themselves handles like “Xanthippe: Lily of Lesbos.”

That’s the whole point. After several thousand years, all this floral imagery just seems…florid. Fussy. Overdone. Too-too. Being a guy – a guy who fled his allergies right into the desert – I may be naturally biased, but the more closely flowers attach themselves to some person or concept, the harder I find taking her or it seriously. Mention the Little Flowers of Saint Francis, and you’ll see my eyes glaze over. With bloody melees, an unsolved murder mystery, and write-ups by Shakespeare himself, the War of the Roses has everything to recommend it to history geeks. I never bit, and I’d bet the name has something to do with why. If anyone decides to re-christen it Plantagenet Bastards Gone Wild, we can put that proposition to the test.

Some of this, as the saying goes, is well above my pay grade. Therese compared herself to a little flower; it’s not like I have any standing to tell her, “No, you’re a chipmunk.” Ss. Joachim and Anne never told the Blessed Mother that she’d leave for Massabielle with roses on her feet over their dead bodies, so why would she listen to me?

But the Church’s cultural elite – did I really use that expression? – can determine how dominant these images become. Therese’s case should stand as a warning. To a Western world half-strangling on garlands courtesy of the pre-Raphaelites and their imitators, “The Little Flower of Jesus,” relentlessly plugged, became less a nickname than an alternate identity. In A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, Betty Smith has a man ask her heroine whether she prays to the Little Flower in order to grow up as pretty as her mother. He doesn’t specify which Little Flower, and the heroine doesn’t ask him to. By 1912, when Smith set her scene, referring to Therese by any other name would have sounded as strange as calling Peter “Simon” or Lady Gaga “Steph.”

The name and image worked just fine, it must be said, for cultural heavyweights like Henri Bergson and Edith Piaf. But their appeal has never been universal. In My life with the Saints, Fr. Jim Martin pleads Therese’s cause at some length to readers who might find her spoiled, scrupulous, bourgeois, neurotic or just plain dizzy. He’s not making these readers up – I know people who think like this. In large part, they’re reacting to Therese’s authorial voice, as translators of her memoir, Story of a Soul, have rendered it. But the moniker does its share, too; taken in conjunction with prayer-card portraits, it mistakenly suggests something decorative, fragile and finally, trivial.

It would be ridiculous to ask artists and hagiographers to drop flowers altogether. (That would turn Catholicism into a Jewish funeral, exactly what it’s not supposed to be.) But I don’t think asking for a little variety would be out of order. The Blessed Mother is the Mystical Rose, but she’s also the Ark of the Covenant, the Ravisher of Hearts and my favorite, the Untier of Knots. (It’s fun to imagine her telling Alexander the Great, “Quit acting like a two-year-old and stay your sword! Go have a lie-down; we’ll work out this Gordian thing later.”)

To her other titles, Kateri could add “Birch of the New World.” Native Americans used birch bark for canoes; Kateri waterproofed herself against temptations of the flesh and spirit. If that doesn’t work, I challenge my readers to come up with something better, or at least join me in praying that Blessed John Henry Newman doesn’t enter the honor rolls as Pansy of Oxford.

Catholic Jokes: Good, and Good for You

This evening, in honor of Fr. Jim Martin’s new book, Between Heaven and Mirth, my editor, Elizabeth Scalia, has put out an APB for Catholic jokes. Well, as it happens, I have a few to share. The first one I heard from the Dominican priest who baptized me. It goes like this:

What’s the difference between the Order of Preachers and the Society of Jesus?

One was founded in the 13th century to fight the Albigensian heresy; the second, in the 16th century to fight the Protestant heresies.

What’s the other difference?

You seen any Albigensians running around lately?

These two I made up my own self. (One I’m recycling, but hey, that’s stewardship, right?)

How many sedevacantists does it take to change a light bulb?

Stupid question. None of them can stand to change anything.

Did you hear about the conservative bishop? (How conservative was he?)

He was so conservative, he condemned the Hypostatic Union for not operating on a right-to-work basis.

Thank you, thank you. I’ll be here all week.

Between Heaven and Mirth…and Snark

I’m proud to report that my patron and heavenly protector, St. Francis de Sales, delivered the best one-liner in Church history since Jesus did his bit about the egg and the scorpion. On seeing his friend St. Jeanne-Francoise de Chantal, a consecrated celibate following her widowhood, in a decolletee gown, he advised, “If you’re not looking to entertain visitors, you’d better take down the signboard.”

Forget funny — that was pure camp, especially if Monseigneur was speaking in his Mae West voice.

I gathered this tidbit last Saturday, when I skimmed Fr. Jim Martin’s Between Heaven and Mirth: Why Joy, Humor and Laughter Are at the Heart of the Spiritual Life. What’s that you say, gentle reader? I should have bought a copy? I agree, but it’s in hardcover. If you want to put one in my Christmas stocking, place your cursor over the link above this article. Start clicking, and don’t stop until I tell you.

Anyway, as far as I could tell, it’s a lovely book. With his trademark low-key yarn-spinning, Fr. Jim makes the case that laughing through life’s cruelties can spur the believer toward spiritual maturation. It’s a theme he’s addressed in his bestselling My Life and the Saints and in his America Magazine pieces. Before the mike, at his countless speaking engagements, he’s embodied his own theme, becoming, in effect, the Jay Leno of Catholic media.

Most of the edifying quips Fr. Jim cites are pretty low in sodium. The saltiest (after Francis de Sales‘) comes from a woman who was recovering from a hysterectomy. When a visiting bishop told her, “I know just how you feel,” she retorted, “Oh, so you’ve had a hysterectomy?” Zing! Way down on the other end is St. Bernadette’s line: “People say I have no heart, but, you see, I sew them all day long.” If Bernadette had any plans to do stand-up, she was smart not to quit her day job.

Fr. Jim cracks open the door for the hard stuff when he writes that humor can speak truth to power. Here he tells the story of the hysterectomy patient, but he might have added St. John Chrysostom’s address to a wealthy audience: “Do you pay such honor to your excrements as to receive them into a silver chamber-pot when another man made in the image of God is perishing in the cold?” The Empress Aelia Eudoxia, fed up with unwanted advice on her bed and bath, sent St. John beyond — into a very uncomfortable exile. The man was willing to suffer for his snark.

But snark, or “aggressive and pre-emptive humor,” as Christopher Hitchens calls it in a different context, can also move laterally. Once the cadaverous Shaw once told the elephantine Chesterton, “If I were as fat as you, I’d hang myself.” Chesterton thrust back: “I’d use you for the rope.” Compare that to the dozens. Superiors also scatter barbs at their inferiors like Napoleon raking the Toulon mob with grapeshot. Just get any credentialed journalist talking about bloggers, or any academic on the subject of Those Darned Kids. In nature, the type of humor that Fr. Jim plugs looks rare to almost to the point of insignificance.

None of this is to suggest that Fr. Jim‘s taste in humor is at all narrow, or that his own wit is anything other than sharp. He is, after all, official chaplain to the not-quite-snarky Colbert Report. In his appearances, he sometimes gives hints of the blood he might draw if he felt like it. He makes a mission of dignifying the light jesting that leads to joy — an inarguably wholesome state — to disarm crabby zealots who see Moe, Larry and Curly as avatars of Termagant, Apollyon and Baphomet. As an example of the type, he tells the story of an acting Jesuit provincial who warned a loopy scholastic, “All mirth is excessive!”

Well, phooey on that guy — who I picture looking like Colonel Flagg from M*A*S*H* – but the way Fr. Jim tells it, the man was already a dinosaur 40 years ago, when the story takes place. Does his kind still present fun-loving Christians with any clear and present danger? I don’t pretend to know. Maybe being a blogger — surrounded, so to speak, by other bloggers and combox cowboys — has skewed my sampling, but it seems to me that a certain cruel flippancy is becoming the default in discussions of faith. Often, the results aren’t funny at all, but they’re clearly meant to be.

I admit, I admire snark more than I should. I’ll also admit I’m pretty bad at it. A few months ago on Patheos, I published a piece where I tried to sound clever, but ended up sounding waspish and smug. To make that point, one reader told me I sounded “gayer than the gayest elf in Mirkwood.” I did think of a good comeback: “Oh, yeah? Well, a straight humorist who can sound gay is like a white singer who can sound black!” Unfortunately, I thought of it six months after my piece went up.

I suppose what I’m yearning for — what I’m putting out an APB for — is some expert parsing of cruelty’s allowable limits in humor. If the pen really is mightier than the sword, then maybe it’s time to consult Thomas Aquinas’ Just War theory. Was Ann Coulter employing proportional force when she called Mike Dukakis a “Greek midget”? Can she really claim to have exhausted all other means to achieve her end? And anyway, by Anglo-Saxon standards, aren’t “Greek” and “midget” practically redundant?

It’s all too much for a punk layman like me. This looks like a job for a Jesuit.