To Arrogate to Castrate

Mention castration to a group of six men, and you’ll get a dozen puns back. A history professor of mine described the practice as a “short cut to success” for Tang Dynasty civil servants. A message board I used to haunt carried a news item about a Welshman who de-knackered himself, apparently to settle a bet on the outcome of a soccer match; within seconds, five male respondents posted back variations on, “Wow, that really took some balls!” or “He must have been nuts!” (I suggested he’d been feeling testy that morning.)

If there’s a woman in the crowd, she’ll roll her eyes, remembering how her friend quietly endured a hysterectomy and wondering why we don’t just grow up. Well, this kind of whistling past the graveyard, giggling at our own worst fear, is our version of adulthood — take it or leave it.

I mention this now because there may soon be a new wave of horror to pre-empt. Dutch Justice Minister Ivo Opstelten has sworn to investigate allegations that Church authorities in the Netherlands ordered boys in their care to be castrated in hope of curing their homosexual inclinations. Ten alleged victims have already told their stories to the NRC Handelsblad; one, Henk Heithuis, said the operation also served as his punishment for telling police a priest had abused him sexually. Radio Netherlands, claiming to have the minutes of meetings where “directors of Catholic institutions” discussed the castrations in the presence of government officials, is reporting that nobody saw any reason to notify the victims’ parents.

An unkindly cut indeed, that. Or as the Italians like to say, ma, che palle! (I understand this to mean, very roughly, “This present situation so vexes me that I feel like I’m wearing a millstone around my scrotum.”)

With the Obama administration in a Mexican standoff with the bishops over health care, people are being forced to ask themselves who runs things better — Church or state? We’ve heard the anti-statist case. The idea that provision of contraception and abortion should be considered a plus in an applicant for a government subsidy is being denounced as anti-Catholicism, plain and simple. Last month, referring to the health care mandate, George Weigel warned: “It’s all about Leviathan as the enforcer of the sexual revolution.” Last week, he broadly invited comparison between the Affordable Care Act and the Polish government’s 1953 claim on the right to appoint and depose Catholic bishops. Slopes everywhere are getting a good rhetorical greasing.

Well, I’ll play the game a little more fairly than that. Even in America, the state has interfered with the reproductive organs of plenty of non-consenting citizens. Mainly, it’s done so in the name of eugenics, which the Church deplores. In the 1927 case Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court upheld a Virgina state law requiring the sterilization of the mentally retarded. The statute remained on the books until 1974; the last forced sterilization took place in Oregon, seven years later. Unlike many states, which sterilized men by removing the vas deferens, Oregon preferred full castration — to punish gays, as well as to protect the gene pool.

At this point, I don’t think either side could reasonably stir the mob by crying, “THEY’RE COMING FOR YOUR TESTICLES!” Still, it might suit both to reflect that, in the not-so-distant past, they did come for people’s testicles. The reasons and legal contexts may have differed, but the condition common to them all was a ruthlessness that led these institutions to promote their perceived interests at the expense of the most vulnerable individuals in their care. Let Church and state take these cases as their cue, as they trade insult and accusation, to walk humbly, or perhaps, to hang low.

Scales Falling from the Eyes: A Retention Experience

Eyes are basically testicles that sit in the middle of your head. Show either too much disrespect in the form of squeezing or prodding, and they will punish you for your impertinence in ways you won’t soon forget. I learned this, or at any rate the apart about eyes, on Tuesday night. The experience constituted one of those miniature Dark Nights of the Soul that, I’m starting to believe, should mark the change of every liturgical season.

For a couple of days, my right eye had been itching. A mild itch, it bothered me no more than a mosquito bite on the arm would have done. But by early evening, I decided the eye had earned a rest. (Of my two gimped eyes, Righty is by far the better and harder-working.) With the usual difficulty, I peeled off my brand-new soft contact lenses and lay down for a nap.

But sleep wouldn’t come. In part, I might have been at fault for drinking three 44-oz Thirstbuster cups of Diet Mountain Dew — cue the Bolivia song from Scarface. But I’ve managed to nod off on the high wire before, so I blame the itching eye. After rinsing Righty out thoroughly, I poured him a dram of OptiFree Pure & Moist Multipurpose Disinfecting Solution and rubbed him with a ferocity fit for a Turkish bathhouse.

I don’t guess Moe Green felt much when the Corleone hit men drilled him through his right eye. For that matter, I’d bet the Hun sniper in Saving Private Ryan floated off to Valhalla pretty peacefully after Barry Pepper put a slug through his. When Harold Godwinson, the last Saxon king of England, caught an arrow in the peeper, courtesy of Normans who’d decided to make his country snooty and class-conscious, he can’t have said much more than “Oh, scite!” before going the way of the Aethelreds. My own luck was both better and worse than theirs. After putting Righty under the knuckle for a bare 90 seconds, my head felt like someone was frying bacon inside it.

In terms of invasiveness, I’d rank an eye-ache right below a toothache, and right above an earache. That kind of pain is impossible to ignore, but pointless to dwell on. The only way to deal with it, I’ve found, is to make it the soundtrack in in an internal discussion of some subject that causes emotional pain. I had just such a subject handy, and it had to do with religion.

This late conflict between Obama and the bishops has me wondering whether I really belong in the Church. I’ve heard it argued persuasively that Obama’s revised guidelines put enough distance between Catholic employers and their employees’ use of contraceptives to make those employers innocent of cooperation in evil. Morever, since the mandate to cover contraception applies to all employers and seems, at least, to be tailored fairly narrowly, I don’t see why it wouldn’t pass muster with the Surpreme Court. For the bishops to claim otherwise, in an election year, and so stridently, gets a little close to partisanship for my tastes.

Of course, this is not how I’m supposed to see things. The bishops are successors of the apostles, princes of their dioceses, and enjoy the exclusive right to speak for the Catholic Church. I’m not sure whether disagreeing with them makes me a canon criminal, exactly, or a latae sententiae excommunicate; but it does make me a dissenter — something I’ve never particularly wanted to be. More than that, ir creates ethical dilemmas for me as a Catholic writer. Do I go on saying what I think, or do I take a dive in the name of team spirit? And anyway, where does team spirit end and careerism begin?

When I first launched this blog, I was eager to speak from the perspective of a convert who found the value systems of Church and World equally attractive and had come to enjoy living in the tension between the two. I imagined I’d be addressing a vast and hungry Catholic center — people who lacked the stomach both for open rebellion and for culture war; who wanted, simply, to form their own consciences quietly, in their own time. Judging by my numbers, these people represent a niche market, at best. At least on Patheos, the top earners are the people who — as I’ve bitterly observed to a few friends — “toss out red meat like tennis balls from a machine.”

If these thoughts flow coherently now, they did less so when I was thinking them, backed by the beat of a throbbing eye. Pain makes me cranky; to do justice to the crank factor, I’d have to re-type the last two paragraphs in caps, in boldface, having stricken all punctuation and inserted at least enough cusswords to form a paragraph all by themselves. For a couple of hours — though I could be wrong here, since pain blunts my sense of time — they replayed themselves in a continual loop until, finally, I dozed off.

When I awoke, it was still dark. The pain was still there. Righty, now swollen shut, let out what felt like a scream whenever the weakest light fell on his lid. Unable to get back to sleep, I tried to start the thought loop again, but this time it couldn’t sustain itself. Every single thought in it now bored me. All that big-font rage and anxiety had collapsed into a dull, small-font murmur.

Most people, including many Catholics, may not know this, but prayer is a great way to pass the time. The most pious period of my life coincided with the beginning of my catechesis, when I was working a second job as a night watchman at a construction site in Scottsdale. Underwhelmed by the beauty of the achitecture, I kept myself awake by smoking cigarettes and praying the Rosary. Jiggling beads seemed an insult to the uniform, and finger Rosaries were still unknown to me, so I counted out the Hail Marys on my actual fingers. By the time I decided that one job was enough for me, I’d trained myself to the point where I could say fourteen or fifteen Rosaries in the course of a single shift. (This was before I learned about spcial intentions, so if Russia takes that much longer to consecrate itself to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, well, izvinite.)

In a spirit of one for the road, I prayed. Starting out very simply, with “God, take the pain away,” I moved to “St. Lucia, pray for me,” and eventually to repeating aloud that I was joining my suffering to the sufferings of Christ. It seemed like a fair enough deal: Jesus’ eyes might have been the only parts of Him that made it to Golgotha unbruised.

Call it the hypnosis of repetition, but I went back to sleep. When I woke up, I found I was able to consider my engorged eye and its insistent pulse with a new objectivity. Light makes pupils expand — or maybe contract; at any rate, to do something that requires some strenuous movement. If the eye’s inflamed for some reason, that movement is going to hurt, much the way walking with a charlie horse woud hurt. It was a perfectly natural and predictable reaction, and there was no reason to infer from it that Righty would soon fall out of my head.

The sun was coming up then. To protect my eye from the beams slipping through the cracks in the blinds, I pulled my pillow over my head and faced the wall. As I dipped back into prayer, it occurred to me that prayer is one of those habits I was in no hurry to give up. Catholicism, for me, might not have become a series of convictions, but it has become a very thorough chain of habits and associations. It had come to form a big part of my life’s intellectual, artistic and social fabric. Ripping it out now, as I’d have to do if I were to leave the Church formally, would mean starting again, from nowhere, with nothing, and with no very clear idea of where I wanted to go.

The fact that I’m pissed off at the Church’s leadership and have nothing very relevant to say to the greater part of her reading public means I’m no less at home than I was in banking and home finance. There, I did my job, ate lunch alone and went home. Here, I go to Mass, make spiritual Communion (the equivalent, as I see it, of making salary with no added commission or bonus), kick over a few bucks and go home. Neither of these barebones approaches comes anywhere near the ideal (or the respective ideals), but both are better than nothing at all.

With my eye semi-healed — with the scales gone, you might say — those conclusions seem even more sensible than they did originally. I probably won’t be able, in good conscience, to keep blogging about the the Church much longer, but I intend to remain a member — one of those conflicted people in the pews with nothing much to say, but, occasionally, “Thanks be to God.”

Santorum: Aspirin Remark a “Bad Joke.”

Yesterday, Rick Santorum defended the honor of women contraceptive-users everywhere…sort of.

During a debate in Congress on the Obama administration’s mandated contraceptive coverage, Santorum backer Foster Friess told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell, “You know, back in my days, they used Bayer aspirin for contraception,” he said. “The gals put it between their knees, and it wasn’t that costly.”

Santorum later responded, “Foster is a well-known jokester. That was a stupid joke. I’m not responsible for every bad joke someone I happen to know or who supports me tells, adding, “Obviously I don’t agree with the basic premise.”

What’s obvious to Santorum might be less so for people who’ve been following his career since his days in the Senate. Santorum has condemned contraception on ideological grounds, recommended that the federal government withhold funds from it, and criticized the reasoning in Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court decision that found state prohibitions on contraceptives unconstitutional. The left-leaning press — your humble blogger here included — has made the most of this. Irin Carmon’s Salon piece, “Rick Santorum Really is After Your Birth Control” is only the most eye-grabbing representative of the genre.

But that was then, this is now. Since the opening of primary season, says David Weigel, Santorum’s been playing down his social conservatism in favor of the economic kind. His views on abortion and gay marriage are well enough known among values voters than he can afford to. He’s even managed to “genericize” his anti-contraceptive views, casting his stand against mandated birth control coverage strictly in free-exercise terms. This is probably a good move, according to Weigel. “In a new New York Times poll,” he writes, “only 47 percent of Republican voters say they’re against any legal recognition of gay unions. In the 2008 entrance poll taken of Iowa caucus-goers, only 26 percent said that ‘the economy’ was their top concern. In 2012, the number was 42 percent, with 36 percent saying ‘the budget deficit’ was tops.”

If Santorum wants to finesse moderates, may he do so in good health. He’s got the vest for it. But to make the act really convincing, he ought to consider treating Foster Friess to some free dental care. Afterward, Friess can borrow some Aspirin from one of his lady friends.