Morris Explains. Again.

November 16, 2012 by Ed Brayton

Dick Morris is still struggling to explain why his predictions for a Romney landslide on election day were so flagrantly wrong. And during an appearance on the Sean Hannity show, he made what I think is an important admission, even while claiming that he really believed it:

“I called it as I saw it from the polling, and I did the best I could — and I also worked very hard for Romney…I spoke about what I believed, and I think that there was a period of time when the Romney campaign was falling apart, people were not optimistic, nobody thought there was a chance of victory. And I felt that it was my duty at that point to go out and say what I said. And at the time that I said it, I believe I was right.”

I believe him when he says that he made those predictions in order to help the Romney campaign, but I don’t believe him when he says he really believed what he was saying. Why? Because Morris was a campaign manager and strategist, and a pretty good one. There’s no way in hell he could actually have believed that. In an identical situation where he was actually being paid as a strategist, there’s no way he would have told his client that he was going to win in a landslide.

I can guarantee you that Romney’s campaign managers did not believe that they were going to win in a landslide. They probably did believe that they could win a very narrow victory if everything broke right for them, and the polls were close enough for that to be a realistic possibility, but only someone completely blind to reality and borderline delusional could have believed it would be an easy win.

November 16, 2012

Camenker: NOM Just Not Bigoted Enough

November 16, 2012 The Petraeus Case and the 4th Amendment

Recent Comments

13 Comments | Leave a Comment

"And mundane chemical weapons."

EnlightenmentLiberal

Not Buying Kim’s Claims About Nuclear ..."

"I can see you went to the Trump school, you want to pay waaaaaay more ..."

Cozmo the Magician

Wallnau Declares Trump ‘King,’ Wants God ..."

"My best friends live in a really religious rural town, so they made sure to ..."

Liberty Counsel Attorney: Sex Ed is ..."

"Please cite some / links etc."

‘Proud’ Mrs. David Vitter Won’t Say ..."

Browse Our Archives

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

view all Nonreligious blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Raging Bee

…but only someone completely blind to reality and borderline delusional could have believed it would be an easy win.

You know as well as I do that there’s no shortage of such people in the PoG. And Romney’s total failure to come up with a timely and decent concesion speech (not to mention his choice of Donald Trump for BFF, and other things) proves that he’s one of those delusional fools. As does his recent whining about “gifts” to undeserving darkies and sluts who stole the election from “Real America.”

And of course, Dick Morris is part of the problem: an alleged expert telling them what they want to hear and enabling them to continue in their delusional bubble-verse.

And he thinks that reinforcing the delusions of evil and dishonest people is his DUTY?! This guy is even scummier than I’d previously thought.
bksea

I think you are misunderstanding the definition of the word “right” here. He believes he was right in that a Romney victory was the “right” (i.e. desired) outcome and his statement was the “right” (i.e. most effective) way to make that happen.

I think a lot of the republican craziness can be explained by believing their underlying ideology is right and thus anything said in support of that ideology is by definition right, whether or not it is true.
usingreason

I still think the best example of how delusional and completely out of touch Romney was came during the third debate when he thought he was pinning down The President on not calling the Libya attacks terrorism. This had been under discussion for weeks, with many people describing the speech the next day. I find it hard to believe than nobody on Team Romney made a point of bringing it to Mitt’s attention that Obama had used the term ‘act of terror’ the very next day. At the time I was stunned at what I was seeing; now trying to describe it, I still am. I cannot imagine a scenario where Romney was not told this; hence, delusional.
holytape

Morris then explained why the polls “were precious to him and that he couldn’t give them up.” He claimed that Obama was tricksy and could not be trusted. He was last seen on the edge of mount doom wrestling with flesh-colored creature named Carl rove. It is believed that both fell to their fiery deaths.
shripathikamath

I believe him when he says that he made those predictions in order to help the Romney campaign, but I don’t believe him when he says he really believed what he was saying. Why? Because Morris was a campaign manager and strategist, and a pretty good one.

But then Mitt is a great businessman too, and you do not make 250 million by ignoring numbers.

Yet he did. He ignored numbers in the media, and he believed his team’s unskewed internal polls

So while you are willing to cut slack for Morris’s stupidity, I am not.

I think he really believed that Romney was going to win.
Michael Heath

usingreason @ 3:

I still think the best example of how delusional and completely out of touch Romney was came during the third debate when he thought he was pinning down The President on not calling the Libya attacks terrorism. This had been under discussion for weeks, with many people describing the speech the next day. I find it hard to believe than nobody on Team Romney made a point of bringing it to Mitt’s attention that Obama had used the term ‘act of terror’ the very next day. At the time I was stunned at what I was seeing; now trying to describe it, I still am. I cannot imagine a scenario where Romney was not told this; hence, delusional.

The Washington Times reported what the president stated the day after the attack as proof he didn’t refer to terrorism. The readers commenting on that article acted as if this was a refutation of what President Obama said in the debate and a validation that Mr. Romney was the one telling the truth.
ricko

” They probably did believe that they could win a very narrow victory if everything broke right for them, and the polls were close enough for that to be a realistic possibility…”

You gonna go with this now, this is your final word?

The guy had an 8% chance of winning on a good day? Please.
laurentweppe

Morris was a campaign manager and strategist, and a pretty good one.

That’s it!

I’ve seen the light!

It’s a conspiracy!

There’s no vendetta between Dick Morris and the Clintons: it’s a smokescreen used by the democratic party before they sent him in GOPland to act as a double-agent provocateur/saboteur. That’s why he is so reliably wrong: in truth, he’s as good as Nate Silver at predicting outcomes, but he keeps telling bullshit in conservative media, and conservative believe him because they think is a bitter, disgruntled former democrat who’s in it for the revenge against Hillary while in fact he’s here to lead them to a wall!
Jordan Genso

It’s the “ignorant” vs. “evil” debate. But it seems as though Morris is trying to say he was guilty of both, thereby making him innocenct, since being wrong on two counts actually makes him right?
F

It’s like having General Buck Turgidson predicting how the vote would go.
Amphiox

Passion can obscure reason.

I think the Romney team, and Republicans in general, believed they were going to win in part because of how much they hated and despised Obama, and simply could not conceive nor accept the possibility that they could be beaten by him.
jamessweet

Raging Bee is quite possibly right here. There have been sources from inside the Romney camp saying that they totally expected to win — when a realistic reading of the polls at best said that they might win. As RB points out, he had no concession speech planned. At all. In addition, there is word that they had booked a whole big fireworks display for election night and had every intention of using it.

That’s the new problem for the GOP: As the party becomes more and more saturated with people who really believe the lies, they collectively lose their ability to see the truth. The cynical liars are being gradually outnumbered by the gullible fools, and that’s bad news for them.
brianwestley

There used to be some realists in the Romney campaign; remember their 3-2-1 strategy to win?

It looked doable at the time, particularly after the first debate when Romney got a boost.

First, win back the three states that historically went R before Obama won in 2008 (Indiana, North Carolina, and Virginia — Romney won back the first two).

Second, win the two big EV states of Ohio and Florida — Romney lost both, but Florida was extremely close.

Third, win any one of the remaining swing states: Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, or New Hampshire (Obama won all of these).