Dean Chambers cracks me up. He seems to be made up of three equal parts: delusion, self-aggrandizement and stupidity. After his epic fail in last year’s election, you’d think he would have just faded from view and spent the rest of his life trying to overcome the shame, but he’s now been thrown a rope — sure, he was dead wrong about the election results, but only because of the IRS scandal!
Yes, he actually argues that the IRS scandal is how Obama stole the election and that if not for that, his predictions would have been spot on. His modus operandi is to note the four states he missed on, point out that there may have been a conservative group in that state that was targeted by the IRS for additional scrutiny and then declare, with no evidence whatsoever, that if that group had only gotten their tax-exempt status, Romney would have won that state and he — Dean Chambers — would have been vindicated as the sage soothsayer he truly is.
The president’s administration engaged in a systematic and wide-scale suppression of Tea Party and conservative activity and votes, via the IRS targeting of those groups and other activities, that I believe clearly denied Mitt Romney the election that clearly would have won by about the very margin I predicted on November 5 of last year. The 2012 election is proven to be bogus, and I have no doubt that the Obama Regime stole that election with a variety of tactics and strategies that suppressed at least 7 million Romney votes across the country, as well as at least 2-3 million more votes gained in the Obama column via voters fraud in several key swing states.
In the officially reported results, Obama won the popular vote by 65.9 million votes to Romney’s 60.9 million votes, or a margin of 5 million votes. I predicted Romney would win about 66.4 million votes to Obama’s 64.1 million votes. If you remove the voter fraud-accounted vote from Obama’s total and add the likely suppressed votes to Romney’s total, you’d arrive at numbers quite close to that projection.I was only wrong in those projections because I was not aware nor did I calculate in the voter fraud and the voter suppression, both of which exceeded the margin by which Barack Obama was declared the winner of that election last Fall. In the five states discussed about, Mitt Romney lost those states collectively by only 847,329 votes, or 527,589 in the other four states not including Pennsylvania, which are the very four states where I projected Romney winning and the official results shows Obama winning. The Obama Regime definitely won the election by suppressing Romney votes and supplementing the votes they won with massive voter fraud in the key swing states. An honest election free of voter fraud and vote suppression would have been won by Mitt Romney by a margin quite close to what I predicted.
That’s almost kinda cute, isn’t it? He actually believes that 2-3 million people committed voter fraud without getting caught. Seriously, how delusional do you have to be to believe such a thing?