Porn Star Kicked Out of Nazi Party. And Out of Porn.

If you think a porn star who is a college student is a matter of controversy, how about a porn star who is a neo-Nazi? A German porn star has been booted out of a neo-Nazi political party after doing an interracial sex scene. And then she was thrown out of the porn industry for being a neo-Nazi.

A German porn star has been dropped by the national neo-Nazi party after her latest film features her having sex with a black man.

The National Democratic Party of Germany had no problem making Ina Groll, 28, the face of its right leaning party, until her latest movie unveiled her in a multi-racial tryst.

The blond tattooed Nazi spokeswoman, who encouraged men to join the cause by wearing seductive outfits outside of polling places, was deemed a poor representation of its organization due to her latest film “Kitty Discovers Sperm,” according to Capitalism Is Freedom.

And then:

It appears Groll, whose porn name is “Kitty Blair,” is not only unwelcome at Nazi functions but also faces a boycott by German pornographers.

“The popular view is that she needs to be locked up, no one needs someone like her with her perverted view of the world,” Axel Schaffrath, a German porn insider who is the former partner of top German porn star Gina Wild, told Central European News. “She certainly has no chance of filming any more porn movies after her Nazi links were revealed. I personally advised the producers to keep her as far away as possible, people like her need to be ignored by everyone.”

John Thompson, head of the Berlin porn film company “GGG,” told the news agency there had been a unanimous decision to boycott the blond actress.

“In the porn film industry, we welcome participants with all skin colours, and all nationalities, but we don’t welcome Nazis,” he said. “If we had known about her political activities, we would have sent her home straight away.”

She should make a porn parody of Hogan’s Heroes.

"And another attempt is being made today by Adolf Trump. https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Robert E. Lee Opposed Confederate Statues
"Its funny. The Republicans refuse to condemn or defend Trump's statements.The folks on the left ..."

Republicans Refuse to Defend Trump on ..."
"It's easy to forget that the alt-right is explicitly against representative government. It needs to ..."

White Supremacists Cancel Book Burning in ..."
"I think he's confusing human's getting sacrificed with humans getting wasted.In a game of "Would ..."

Swanson Thinks Burning Man Wants to ..."
Follow Us!
POPULAR AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://healthvsmedicine.blogspot.com cervantes

    Sheesh, they’ll get you coming and going . . .

  • http://www.thelosersleague.com theschwa

    The Nazi Party should keep her. They can use her as example of their new slogan: “Whites are best, screw the other races!”

  • dingojack

    cervantes – “…and going and coming

    and always too soon!:”

    Dingo

    ——–

    PS: Nazi porn – clearly a minority report.

  • Blondin

    She should make a porn parody of Hogan’s Heroes.

    Kind of appropriate considering that Bob Crane graduated from Hogan’s Heroes to a career in porn.

  • David C Brayton

    Now that’s funny.

  • http://www.ranum.com Marcus Ranum

    I think the nazis are trying to put themselves a bit on a pedestal if they think they are too good for her. Sounds like she was doing what’s called “working for a living” which is certainly more moral and useful than “hating out of habit”

  • Abby Normal

    Too lowly to be allowed to be the center of a piss bukkake? That’s got to be some kind of record.

  • http://motherwell.livejournal.com/ Raging Bee

    “The popular view is that she needs to be locked up, no one needs someone like her with her perverted view of the world,” Axel Schaffrath, a German porn insider who is the former partner of top German porn star Gina Wild, told Central European News.

    Um…I suspect her view of the world may be changing. Perhaps this porn insider should be less quick to judge, and more quick to use this as an opportunity to show how white racists aren’t any better for whites than for nonwhites.

  • Abdul Alhazred

    Kicked out of porn for being a Nazi?

    That makes no sense at all. I thought Nazis are hawt. :)

  • Pierce R. Butler

    Maybe Ted Nugent is looking for some arm candy…

  • schism

    If you think a porn star who is a college student is a matter of controversy, how about a porn star who is a neo-Nazi?

    ♪ One of these things is not like the other… ♪

  • moarscienceplz

    @#4 Blondin

    Bob Crane graduated from Hogan’s Heroes to a career in porn.

    Not true. Crane had a very free-wheeling sex life, and he filmed many of his trysts (possibly occasionally with a hidden camera, keeping this a secret from his sex partners). But there is no indication he did this for money. He actually was working the dinner theater circuit at the time of his death.

  • http://www.holytape.etsy.com holytape

    No country for Neo-Nazi Porn Queens.

  • doublereed

    It’s always so difficult for me to feel sorry for neo-nazis.

  • http://cheapsignals.blogspot.com Gretchen

    It appears Groll, whose porn name is “Kitty Blair,” is not only unwelcome at Nazi functions but also faces a boycott by German pornographers.

    “The popular view is that she needs to be locked up, no one needs someone like her with her perverted view of the world,”

    First thought– being rejected from the porn world due to “perversion”? Har.

    Second, more serious thought– It’s a good thing “the popular view” doesn’t prevail, at least in this case. Views of the world, perverted or otherwise, are no grounds for locking anyone up.

    Third, semi-serious thought– You can’t actually stop someone from making porn if they want to. All you can do, as a fellow porn producer, is refuse to have them in your porn. And thank goodness for that as well. Not because I disapprove of this boycott, but because, again, bigots have freedom of views and expression as well. And porn is a kind of expression.

  • steffp

    @ Gretchen #15

    Miss Groll is a German and living in Germany, so she is subject to German law.

    Germany, for twelve years, was ruled by real Nazis, which resulted in open terror against minorities and political adversaries, multiple genocide, a world war, and the hollowing and loss of most civil rights. Fortunately, the Nazis lost the war, and were ostracized thereafter. So, unlike the US, it is a crime in Germany to deny the holocaust, promote miscegenation laws, use Nazi flags or symbols or try to rebuild a Nazi Party. Which leads to strange little dances when far-right guy(& gals) make Nazi style statements. The notorious figures are regularly in jail for such, while others try to keep inside the “legitimate” spectrum.

    It may sound a bit strange for US citizens, such an infringement on free speech, but for the Germans it is an article of secular faith that Nazis be never again allowed to act in politics.They had their chance 1933-45, and it is regarded as a fact that they’d do all those unspeakable things again if one would let them act freely.

    Thus – and not only in polite company, but practically nationwide – uttering Nazi-style opinions leads to societal isolation and criminal proceedings. It’s a bit like the good old US anti-communism: the details may not be discussed, all such ideas are summarily dismissed.

    Miss Groll (meaning “grudge” in German), it seems, tried to pull a PR stunt, and it went bad. The comments cited above refer to the German (Nazi) miscegenation laws which forbade marriage and sexual contact across race boundaries, much like in the US before Loving vs. Virginia, 1967. Those laws were (irrevocably) abandoned in Germany 1945 by the then Allies and victors.

    So, all in one sentence, there is no freedom of expression for Nazi thoughts in Germany.

  • http://cheapsignals.blogspot.com Gretchen

    steffp,

    Thanks, but I knew all of that already.

    When I say “freedom of expression,” I’m not talking about what the law allows. I’m talking about the basic human right. The fact that in many places throughout the world this right is not recognized– for various reasons– is tragic. But it doesn’t make the right non-existant, any more than the existence of slavery negates the human right to autonomy.

  • Big Boppa

    A German porn star has been booted out of a neo-Nazi political party…

    Shouldn’t that be jack-booted out?

  • Synfandel

    @3 Dingo, there’s nothing like a Lily von Schtupp quote to lighten my day.

  • NitricAcid

    I enjoyed “Ilsa, Queen of the Nazi Love Camp”, but I suppose it won’t play very well outside of Alberta (not knowing who Keegstra is would ruin half the plot).

  • http://motherwell.livejournal.com/ Raging Bee

    You can’t actually stop someone from making porn if they want to.

    No, but a company that controls lots of the equipment, space, sets, etc. that you need to make and market porn can lock you out of their action, other actors can refuse to work with you, and distributors can boycott your work. You can still make porn, but it would be limited to selfies and amateur sex-tapes, and you’d have a hard time getting noticed. I’m not saying that SHOULD happen to this particular ex-Nazi (not yet anyway), but it CAN happen.

  • timberwoof

    Nazis have demonstrated that they would remove everyone’s freedom of expression. They would make pornography illegal (perhaps the modern ones would only make unapproved porn illegal; is that any better?) and they would certainly make promoting other forms of government illegal. They would destroy the liberal democratic order of society. It’s perfectly fair to let them operate under the kinds of restrictions they want to impose on the rest of us.

    Explain to me again why I should tolerate intolerance?

  • http://cheapsignals.blogspot.com Gretchen

    Explain to me again why I should tolerate intolerance?

    Because if you don’t, what makes you any better?

    I’ve heard the same portrayal from right-wingers who want to go ahead and slaughter all of the prisoners at Gitmo rather than actually try and sentence them or let them go, because after all the prisoners wouldn’t be any more just to them if they were the prisoners.

    “Why should I not be barbaric to the people who would be barbaric to me?” has never been what I’d call a convincing argument.

  • Chiroptera

    timberwoof, #22: Explain to me again why I should tolerate intolerance?

    it depends. If you are talking about your personal life and with whom you choose to associate, then there is no reason for you to tolerate intolerance.

    On the other hand, if you are advocating putting in place institutions and a legal framework so that the state may impose official intolerance, then you have to consider what happens if and when they win the elections. Then you have just handed them the tools to practice official intolerance against you.

    These people may not be supporters of constitutional democracy and may try to destroy the opposition anyway, but at least if they have to put in place the legal framework and institutions from scratch that allows the opposition some time to counteract them, like by unelecting them.

  • http://reasondecrystallized.blogspot.com andrew

    You know what … I actually feel kinda sorry for her. Not that it’s not funny as hell, and not that she didn’t totally have it coming (*snrk* I’m twelve), but it still sucks to be her right now. Hopefully seeing the hatred turned on her will be a learning experience.

  • dingojack

    Timberwolf (#22) – asked ‘explain to me again why I should tolerate intolerance?’

    I can’t remember where you are, but in the US I see three major problems (off the top of my head):

    1. Since your proposing to deprive a person of their (perfectly legal) living it would be an act of attainder*

    2. Since you would have one law for one but the other, there would be a 14th Amendment issue

    3. And there would be a 1st amendment issue, specifically the ‘right to free speech’

    Dingo

    ——–

    * in the American definition

  • Holms

    I don’t see why this is a problem. The pornographers can network together and work without her; they have no obligation to keep her employed unless they have a contract with her.

  • dingojack

    Holms – put it this way:

    ‘Film makers can network together and work without her; they have no obligation to keep her employed, especially as she’s been blacklisted as a (former) Communist Party member’

    – Hollywood apologist c1954.

    Now do you see why some might object?

    Dingo

  • leonardschneider

    “John Thompson, head of the Berlin porn film company “GGG,” told the news agency there had been a unanimous decision to boycott the blond actress.”

    For reference sake, “GGG” stands for “German Goo Girls.” Yeah, they do bukakke shorts. John Thompson Productions has several different, separate production companies, some fairly straight, others along the lines of GGG. Personally, bukakke never did much for me: what you’re really watching is a bunch of men masturbate. When I was working around porn, bukakke hadn’t hit the U.S. from Japan yet. Even if it had, it wouldn’t have moved: trying to sell pornography where genitalia is pixelated out — as all Japanese content will be — would kill sales.

    “’In the porn film industry, we welcome participants with all skin colours, and all nationalities, but we don’t welcome Nazis,’ he said. ‘If we had known about her political activities, we would have sent her home straight away.’”

    And really, that’s all it would have taken to get rid of her. Did the honchos and suits from the different production companies all get together and sit around a big table, smoking cigars, and forcefully deciding to destroy her career? I highly doubt it, since it wouldn’t be needed. It was probably more a case of, over the course of a few days, various phone calls and emails happening, the gist of them being, “You ever gonna hire the crazy bitch again? I sure ain’t.”

    I know absolutely nothing about German labor laws and regulations, but working on the assumption that the industry in Germany is like the industry here, all performers, male and female, are independent contractors. They get their 1099s at the end of the year like any other contractor. The contracts performers have with the production companies may be for one or two days, or, in the case of a serious big-budget film like Pirates XXX, up to six weeks. (Pirates XXX was a very ambitious project.) High-end production companies like Hustler, Vivid, or even Naughty America will spend one or two weeks filming; the performers’ contracts will last about the same. A studio cranking out wank-loops will have fresh contracts to sign every damn day: your average suck-and-fuck loop needs performers on site for six hours, maximum. Performers will find out at the end of the day if there’s any work tomorrow, or call in in the morning.

    The upshot is that Ina Groll had no contract to sever or buy out, she sure as hell wasn’t a salaried employee…. All that’s going to happen is her phone is going to stop ringing, and her calls to the studios will go ignored. It can happen to performers for less reasons than being a neo-Nazi: gain a reputation as a primadonna, heavy drug abuser (yes, drugs are still around, but in less quantity and waaay more subtle), or just a raging pain in the ass to work with on set, and you’ll find yourself cut out: nobody wants you as part of their shoot. And in porn, especially for female performers, you are easily replaced.

    Of course, the flip side of this are production companies who don’t treat their performers well, usually the smaller companies. Word gets around that Knob-O-Throb Studios is insulting or offensive to the performers, can’t get any better shoot locations than a Ramada suite, and bounce paychecks. (Performers, especially females, get treated with respect both on and off shoot. Even the “target” for a bukakke loop will be treated with professional courtesy.) Too much bullshit and no one with even minor experience in the industry will work for you. So, Knob-O-Throb finds themselves having to use complete novices: and the novices, only knowing what they’ve heard as rumors, are useless; they think they’re there for a party. (“They get me high and I fuck a lot and they pay me! Like, too cool!”) The product is terrible, with blown blocking, awful performance, and a female lead who does everything but look at the camera and yell “Hi mom!” Knob-O-Throb is usually out of business in eighteen months…. Only to be replaced by a different set of goofballs with two cheap digital video cameras, a couple umbrella lights, a room at a Day’s Inn, and a hard-on.

    Oh, and dingojack? No, they really do have no obligation to get her on set. Now that people know who and what she is, you’d probably see the first mass walk-off on a porn set, ever: her very presence would create trouble, so why have her around? Gosh, she can’t even land a two day contract doing a couple anal or suck-and-fuck loops. Oh dear, what a shame.

    (Of course, if she was working for John Thompson, much of her income was possibly based on her willingness to have a couple dozen different guys jack off all over her face. It’s not exactly the most prestigious position to land. Bukakke pays pretty well, but is also seen as the domain of people with habits to feed, if you get my drift.)

    And I looked her up. She’s just some skinny titless wonder willing to take a facial. A few promo shots, some hardcore stills from a few different videos. Nobody was promoting her, as far as I could tell. Big deal. In L.A., she could be replaced in about two hours.

  • dingojack

    leonardschneider – Oh I see, she’s (and I’ll quote you directly here) “…just some skinny titless wonder willing to take a facial. A few promo shots, some hardcore stills from a few different videos. Nobody was promoting her, as far as I could tell. Big deal. In L.A., she could be replaced in about two hours.” so she deserves to be on a blacklist. Got it.

    Nice to see no misogynistic victim-blaming based on a person’s appearance going on here. @@

    Dingo

  • http://polrant@blogspot.com democommie

    This:

    ‘ you’d probably see the first mass walk-off on a porn set, ever: ”

    Is a labor action, a mass walk-off.

    This

    “bukakke never did much for me: what you’re really watching is a bunch of men masturbate.”

    is a mass whack-off.

    @30:

    I would say that Leonard Schneider, from his self-reports, has seen a lot of pretty heinous shit done in this life (I have too, but not in the same areas). As for the comment you quote, it is a physical description and an observation, based on visual evidence. I think that it’s somewhat difficult to “victim blame” someone who fucks and sucks for a living and has reprehensible politics as the guiding force for their actions when the fucking and sucking market dries up, so to speak.

    The young lady has made a number of pretty bad choices and now she appears to be reaping the whirlwind.

    OTOH, poor Hank Williams, Jr. could prolly get something going with her–he’s not working Monday nights, these days.

  • leonardschneider

    @ Dingo:

    “so she deserves to be on a blacklist. Got it.”

    Re-read what I posted. There is no blacklist: there can’t be; keep in mind that while the studios do communicate with each other, they’re also in competition. Production companies have no stake in which performers get hired on by other companies. But…. It’s still a relatively tight-knit industry, so the rumor machine never stops cranking away. Any performer can find him or herself doing less and less work, for worse studios, by gaining a reputation for being a pain in the ass on shoots. Eventually the work goes away completely. (Again, re-read the whole comment, not just the parts that annoy you.)

    In Groll’s case, she would be more than a pain in the ass on shoots, she would be an active disruption. (I’ve dealt with hectic shoots, but her presence would make those look like a birthday party.) Both performers and crew would simply refuse to work with her in any way, period: just her walking into the room would prompt loud and angry protests from all corners, with a consensus getting generated from staff and performers:

    “I will not do her makeup.”

    “I refuse to light her.”

    “I won’t fuck her.” “Neither will I.” “Me either.”

    “I will not point a camera at her.” “Me either.”

    “I will not mike her.”

    “Calm down everybody. I won’t direct her, and I’m getting on the phone with the producer even as we speak.”

    (Male performer) “So is the day blown?”

    (Director) “No. We may be working with a novice, but we’ll get some work done.”

    That’s not getting blacklisted, that’s actively working yourself out of a job. Nobody owes her a damn thing, least of all work in front of a camera.

    “Nice to see no misogynistic victim-blaming based on a person’s appearance going on here.”

    Nope, there sure isn’t.

    As democommie said, I was just reporting on what I found. Try Google Images, safe-search off, “Kitty Blair”. See the results for yourself: when I was drinking, I had better tits. (Remember, this is PORN, and your physical appearance is exactly how you are judged.) Also check Google and skip the articles about this post and see if you can find ANY promo material. It ain’t there. I got six pages in with no results. In other words, no studio felt she was worth promoting; thus, she could be replaced very quickly. (It’s no great feat to find women willing to suck and fuck on camera. The trick is to find ones who do it well. That usually takes a day or so.)

    As far as “victim blaming” goes, uh, riiiight. Not sure how you’d find ’em, but I’ve made my feelings about neo-Nazis explicitly clear on these comment boards in the past (four words: scar tissue on knuckles*). I’ll try to schedule feeling some sympathy for Groll and her now-defunct career sometime in mid-May.

    Who knows? Maybe she can emigrate to the U.S., hook up with what’s left of the White Aryan Resistance, and start a fascist porn studio. Titles like “Swastika Suck-Off,” “Hate Humps,” “Fucking For the Fatherland,” and “Aryan Anal Antics.” Of course, no American distributor would touch them, and finding performers would be a Sisyphean task — Nazi-skin girls either look like the heavy beer drinkers (cellulite don’t sell) or amphetamine users they are, and there’s a lot more to being a male performer than access to Cialis: erectile drugs get you hard, but don’t prolong the action as well as people think: it just shortens your recovery time…. And coming five minutes into a shoot has just blown the money shot. Sure, the Cialis or Viagra will get you hard again in a couple minutes (it never goes all the way down, if you’re being stimulated: fluffers of the world, we salute you) but you’re, um, empty. Not to be too gross about it, but nobody’s gonna be impressed by a facial when all the man has to offer is a pathetic little dribble of cum. What should have been the money shot is probably soaking into the motel bedspread. With luck, the male had the sense to pull out and aim, and the video can be edited to, y’know, put things in the correct order.

    ‘Sides, the Nazi skins are dumb enough to take a 5X dose of Viagra, find themselves bowlegged with pain six hours later (“It won’t go down! I’ve jacked off like six times, and it won’t go away, and it’s turning purple and really hurts!”), then end up in the hospital being told Little Adolph is never gonna work again.

    ___________________________________________________

    *No, I wouldn’t punch Groll. (Does that make me a chauvinist?) I’d punch the armband-wearing guy she was with, but I wouldn’t punch her. My wife would. 8^)