Larry Klayman Sanctioned. Again.

Larry Klayman bad habits have caught up with him again. He’s being publicly censured by the Office of Bar Counsel in Washington, DC for violating the ethics rules that govern the behavior of attorneys. It all apparently stems from his acrimonious split with Judicial Watch, the group he founded and was later thrown out of.

Larry Klayman, the Washington attorney who won a landmark trial court ruling against government surveillance, has agreed to accept a public censure for violating attorney ethics rules.

Klayman signed the negotiated discipline with the Office of Bar Counsel in Washington on Monday. Klayman was accused of conflicts of interest in three cases in which he represented a client suing Judicial Watch, the conservative watchdog group he founded and later had a falling out with after leaving in 2003.

“I wanted to put [the ethics case] behind me because I have a lot of important things to do to also protect the American people,” Klayman said on Tuesday.

Oh yes, I’m sure that’s true. It isn’t because he knew he would lose or anything, it’s just so he can get back to the important work of protecting freedom and democracy and cute kittens. It’s kinda like how Newt Gingrich cheated on his second wife (the one he had cheated on his first wife with) because he just loved his country so much.

We’ll add this to the list of Klayman’s misbehavior, which includes taking a $25,000 retainer from a client and failing to provide legal services, then repeatedly failing to pay her back, resulting in being reprimanded by the Florida Bar Association. And being hammered by the judge in his lawsuit against Judicial Watch:

A federal judge took attorney Larry Klayman to task for his “consistent pattern of engaging in dilatory tactics” and disobedience of the court during a 5-year legal battle against Judicial Watch, which Klayman founded.

The judge granted Judicial Watch’s motion to strike aspects of Klayman’s contributions to the parties’ revised joint pretrial statement.

“The court concludes that the requested sanction is appropriate under the unique circumstances presented in this case – most notably, Klayman’s consistent pattern of engaging in dilatory tactics, his disobedience of court-ordered deadlines, and his disregard for the federal rules of civil procedure and the local rules of this court, coupled with the patent failure of the court’s use of lesser sanctions in the past to have any discernible effect on Klayman’s conduct in this litigation,” U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote…

“Despite the passage of five years, resolution of this action has been needlessly delayed, largely as a result of Klayman’s conduct in this litigation,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote, recounting numerous instances when Klayman refused to file documents and responses on time.

Citing his routine disobedience, Judicial Watch filed is motion to strike with regard to Klayman’s pretrial statement, specifically his statement of the case, list of witnesses, list of exhibits and deposition designations.

“Klayman filed a two-sentence opposition to defendants’ motion to strike, claiming in relevant part that ‘the sanctions requested by defendants is [sic] not warranted,'” according to the Aug. 10 decision.

The motion to strike precludes Klayman from presenting any affirmative evidence in support of his claims or in his defense of the counterclaims.

“Without a doubt, this is a severe sanction,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote. “Its application in this action will effectively prevent Klayman from carrying his burden of proof on his claims, thereby almost certainly requiring dismissal.”

This is a guy who sued his own mother, for crying out loud, for failing to pay him back $50,000 he loaned her to take care of his dying grandmother.

Follow Us!
POPULAR AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Synfandel

    It’s this kind of behaviour that risks giving the legal profession a bad name.

  • colnago80

    Re synfandel @ #1

    The legal profession could alleviate that by insisting that the bar association yank Klaymann’s ticket. What does it take to give this clown the heave ho.?

  • Doug Little

    This is a guy who sued his own mother, for crying out loud, for failing to pay him back $50,000 he loaned her to take care of his dying grandmother.

    Wow, not only America’s worst lawyer but also a fucking asshole, how does he manage?

  • pocketnerd

    Thus Spake ZaraEd Brayton:

    This is a guy who sued his own mother, for crying out loud, for failing to pay him back $50,000 he loaned her to take care of his dying grandmother.

    Larry Klayman did that because he just loves and respects his mother and grandmother so much, he wants them to have the Dignity of Work™ rather than relying on handouts. The REAL crime is you biased liberal Clinton Obama-worshippers using this as a distraction from Vince Foster Benghazi!

  • Artor

    Why oh why does this fucktard still have a license?

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    …dilatory tactics…

    Man, that takes me back. I remember playing Dilatory Tactics on the GBA.

     

    This is a guy who sued his own mother, for crying out loud, for failing to pay him back $50,000 he loaned her to take care of his dying grandmother.

    She ripped him off. Ten grand, at most. I know a guy.

  • Pierce R. Butler

    Well, whaddya expect: Klayman’s mama was a chiseler too!

  • John Pieret

    I have a lot of important things to do

    I know … restoring public morality, right?

    However, we may have to yank his title as “worst lawyer in America not named … ”

    Larry won a SECOND case! Of course, it was against the idiots who ousted him from Judicial Watch. It seems a Judicial Watch employee told Orly Taitz that Klayman was “convicted” for not paying child support when, in fact, he had only been indicted. Orly published it on the web.

    Larry has won $156,000 in compensatory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages from a jury in a defamation action against Judicial Watch.

    To give you an idea of the level of competition, it seems that, during a video deposition of a witness from Judicial Watch the witness mouthed “asshole” to Larry. As a public figure Larry had to show that the defamatory statement was the result of malice. Talk about making it easy!

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/06/10/larry-klayman-wins-one-against-judicial-watch/

  • Ben P

    What does it take to give this clown the heave ho.?

    Depends on the bar association, but the one thing that’s almost always a sure thing is stealing money from your client trust account.

    Certain criminal offenses are a good shot. Clinton voluntarily surrendered his a Arkansas law license after he was reported for the perjury allegations in the sexual harassment case.

    Most things like what clayman is alleged to have done get punished by sanctions, censures and suspensions. Maybe a disbarment if it’s repeated and extreme.

  • Pingback: Oh, How I Love Larry Klayman | FreemontTheGood Blog()