John Birch Society Hearts Gordon Klingenschmitt

Birds of a wingnut feather flock together, it seems. The New American, the house organ of the John Birch Society, lavishes praise on Gordon Klingenschmitt. Most amusingly, they praise him for standing up to Right Wing Watch for the terrible sin of quoting him verbatim and showing him saying bizarre and extreme things.

Klingenschmitt was also probably remembering his fight with Right Wing Watch (RWW), the vicious political action arm of the Leftist organization People for the American Way which took excerpts from his TV show and republished them, unedited, except for changing the titles. Those titles were designed to make Klingenschmitt appear radical if not certifiable.

He posted notices of infringement at their YouTube sites and those videos offensive to Klingenschmitt were temporarily removed. He posted those notices, he said, “because I got tired of their theft, copyright infringement and piracy of my original video content.” He continued, “They don’t add any value to the content. They simply steal and copy and post with their own logo. They are not a legitimate news organization.”

Typical of the retitling of some of Klingenschmitt’s shows include these:

Klingenschmitt Declares that ENDA [the Employment Non-Discrimination Act supported by several pro-LGBT advocacy groups] Promotes Bestiality

Klingenschmitt Says Wendy Davis [a Texas politician who supports same-sex marriage] Is Ruled By A “Demon of Murder”

Yes, typical because he actually said those things. They provided the actual video and transcripts of him doing so, which led to this:

When RWW pushed back against Klingenschmitt’s successful, if temporary, removal of the offensive YouTube posts, Klingenschmitt sought legal advice. His decision not to sue gave a measure of the man:

My lawyers believe they [RWW] are vulnerable. They said I should sue them, but I don’t want to do that right now because I don’t want to hurt them. My goal is only to defend my content.

No, see, it wasn’t successful precisely because it was temporary. YouTube automatically pulls down video when someone files a copyright challenge, but each and every time once RWW had a chance to respond, they restored the videos because Klingenschmitt had no case. He’s lying when he says he didn’t want to sue. He simply doesn’t have a case. If he filed a copyright infringement suit, it would take about 8 seconds for the case to get dismissed because those videos clearly fall under the fair use doctrine.

POPULAR AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • tbp1

    Amazing that so many people on the right consider it libel or slander if you quote them verbatim or post unedited video of them.

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    Thank goodness the Birchers are backing him up. Without them, Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy could sap and impurify all of his precious bodily fluids.

  • John Pieret

    Amazing that so many people on the right consider it libel or slander if you quote them verbatim or post unedited video of them.

    But … but … they intended those things to only go to the people who agree with them, not to normal people who might laugh at them!

    Klingyshit is ‘confused’ as to why his election to a seat in the Colorado House of Representatives has generated so much controversy and criticism.

    http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/why-would-people-hate-chaplain-gordon-klingenschmitt-cannot-understand-controversy-surroundi#sthash.wbz2qhNJ.dpuf

    Ahem, Gordie, it’s probably because people are now noticing the things you say.

  • sabrekgb

    Quite so. With few exceptions, if posting unedited footage is an attack…you’re attacking yourself. If what you said, not twisted or massaged into a different form but exactly as you said it, is slanderous…well then you’re slandering yourself. Which is nonsense. Which is also appropriate, as Klingenschmitt spouts almost exclusively the same.

  • http://www.pandasthumb.org Area Man

    My lawyers believe they [RWW] are vulnerable. They said I should sue them, but I don’t want to do that right now because I don’t want to hurt them.

    That has got to be the worst lie I have ever seen.