Gaffney: Muslim Congressman Might Give Info to Terrorists!

Deranged bigot Frank Gaffney is losing his mind over a Muslim congressman on the House Intelligence Committee, saying that he should be removed because if he gets his hands on classified information he might share it with the Muslim Brotherhood to help build a global Muslim caliphate.

A Washington-based think tank focused on national security has released a dossier on Muslim U.S. Rep. Andre Carson, D-Ind., charging his association with radical Islamic groups warrants his removal from the House Intelligence Committee.

The Center for Security Policy, in its report, called for a “rigorous assessment of the potential risks associated with Rep. Carson’s vulnerabilities to recruitment, blackmail or suborning.”

CSP President Frank Gaffney served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for nuclear forces and arms-control policy during the 1980s and later was a staff member for the Senate Armed Services Committee. He explained why Carson should be removed from the committee.

“Since there are, at the moment, few topics more in need of assiduous oversight by the Congress – even if there were no actual risk of compromise of national security secrets or Muslim Brotherhood influence operations associated with Rep. Carson’s presence on the House Intelligence Committee – the potential impediment he may constitute to such work demands his removal from this panel.”…

Gaffney said it is “wholly unacceptable to have as a member of a key congressional committee charged with overseeing U.S. intelligence and counterintelligence an individual with extensive personal and political associations with the Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihadist infrastructure in America.”

“At a minimum, Rep. Andre Carson’s presence on the House Intelligence Committee will necessitate restrictions on his access to classified information about the presence and operations in this country of what amounts to a subversive Islamist Fifth Column and his participation in the panel’s deliberations concerning how it can best be countered.”

The report said Pelosi’s decision to name Carson to the panel “raises deep concerns from a national security perspective.”

“Particularly alarming is Rep. Carson’s long history of associating with organizations known to be front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood, which has as a goal the establishment of a worldwide Muslim caliphate,” the report said.

I know, right? I felt the same way about Ron Paul, who openly associates with Christian Reconstructionists like Michael Peroutka and Gary North (his former chief of staff and now the director of curriculum for his “Ron Paul Curriculum” project) who want to establish a Christian theocracy that would mirror the religious barbarism of a Muslim caliphate.

"Yet another headline that's a word too long."

Palin’s Pointless Appeal
"Me ? I live in London, via Scotland and Ireland. A mongrel to be sure, ..."

Catholic School to Punish Students for ..."
"Groucho Marx: "I wouldn't want to join any country club that would let me be ..."

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • D. C. Sessions

    Don’t be silly, Ed. A Muslim Caliphate would be infinitely worse than a Christian Reconstructionist regime. Under the Caliphate, we wouldn’t be able to have bacon.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1159674804 robertbaden

    What about all the Catholic politicians who owe allegiance to the Vatican?

  • Chiroptera

    …his association with radical Islamic groups….

    What constitutes a “radical” Islamic group? One that has “Muslim” or “Islam” in the name?

  • John Pieret

    D. C. Sessions:

    It is possible at least to live without bacon … but under the Caliphate, we wouldn’t be able to have beer!

  • laurentweppe

    Under the Caliphate, we wouldn’t be able to have bacon.

    Hungarian Joke’s time:

    What was the better period, the Ottoman occupation or the Austrian one?

    Answer: the Ottoman: at least the Turks refrained from stealing the pork.

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    …civilization jihadist infrastructure…

    Oh no! That’s the worst kind of jihadist infrastructure!

  • lldayo

    A Muslim that disagrees with what the extremists are doing would be the PERFECT addition to this committee! Who else would have better motivation to do something about this issue then someone who’s whole belief system is being questioned because of the evil actions of a minority faction?

  • whheydt

    Let’s see… We need to bar…

    Catholics…because they might leak information to the Vatican.

    Christian Fundamentalists…because the might leak information to Reconstructionists,

    Jews…because they might leak information to Israel,

    Men…because the might leak information to MRA organizations.

    Anyone of any other religion…because they might leak information to their co-religionists or countries where their religion dominates.

    So I guess the committee should only consist of atheist women.

    Sounds good to me.

  • cswella

    @whheydt:

    Can’t overlook those ‘feminazis’

  • John Pieret

    jihadist infrastructure

    Is that where they build roads and bridges according to specifications in the Quran?

  • dugglebogey

    If only there were a document or a rulebook somewhere that made it so you weren’t allowed to discriminate against persons based on their religious beliefs.

    Wouldn’t that be great?

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    John Pieret “Is that where they build roads and bridges according to specifications in the Quran?”

    Yes, but as jihadists they have to build them already blown up. It’s murder on the crew.

  • Jared James

    Assumes facts not in evidence, that anyone at the “Center for Security Policy” knows what security or policy is.

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    Jared James, they didn’t say it was good security or good policy. They’re not even sure about the “Center”. Or the “for”. There’s still a guy out front pushing on a clearly marked “Pull” door.

  • caseloweraz

    Modusoperandi: Yes, but as jihadists they have to build them already blown up. It’s murder on the crew.

    This job sounds like it’s the pits.

    (ducking…)

  • caseloweraz

    Gaffney said it is “wholly unacceptable to have as a member of a key congressional committee charged with overseeing U.S. intelligence and counterintelligence an individual with extensive personal and political associations with the Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihadist infrastructure in America.”

    Sounds like it’s irrelevant. I have it on “good” authority that Obama is establishing a Muslim caliphate all by himself, without help from Andre Carson.

  • matty1

    I had to look up the extensive connection.

    He received a campaign donation from CAIR

    CAIR was in a long list of groups used in the trial of something called the Holy Land Foundation for sending funds to Hamas

    The list is described as unindicted co conspirators but as far as I can tell no specific allegations were made. It was a list of groups the prosecution might mention didn’t

    Going by this standard I have to announce my extensive personal and professional links to Barak Obama. A friend once complained that her favourite cycle route had been closed for the NATO summit

  • http://festeringscabofrealityblogspot.com fifthdentist

    “Gaffney: Muslim Congressman Might Give Info to Terrorists!”

    I agree; the risk is just too great. Giving information to terrorists would be a slap in the face to our entire system. The American way would be to SELL the information to the highest bidder. Good thing these guys are looking out for capitalism and the free market against those Socialist Muslim jihadist hordes who are on the verge of establishing a worldwide caliphate.