Shoebat Calls for ‘Slaughter’ of ‘Reprobates’

Theodore Shoebat, the even more extremist offspring of fake “ex-terrorist” Walid Shoebat, is once again calling for the slaughter — his word, not mine — of homosexuals because a gay pride event in Toronto had naked men in it and some children saw it.

The Law of God, that says that homosexuals must be put to death, must be enacted against this evil. You say that this is inhumane, that it is cruel, but it is not. What is truly cruel is giving freedom to caretakers and disgusting parents the “freedom” to force children to watch this sickness manifest before their innocent eyes. Any parent, or adult, who brings children to a sodomite event should be arrested and punished, for those that “have pleasure in them that do them” “are worthy of death” (Romans 1:32), as we learn from the sublime words of St. Paul.

This is true love, to destroy evil where it stands, to cut it off before it grows like a weed and consumes all of the nurturing love of righteous truth.

St. Paul himself tells us that the punishment of sodomites, murderers, kidnappers, and other evil people through the law, is done for the purpose of love…

The state must slaughter these wicked reprobates or else they will continue to flood the world with their gloomy darkness.

How fucking deranged do you have to be to declare that we must “slaughter” all gay people “for the purpose of love”? This fucking deranged.

"Aren't the Orange One's tweets 24 carrot?"

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."
"Ed has really stepped in it this time. Ouch."

Fox News Allows Judge Jeanine to ..."
"To be fair, they normally settle down around wife no. 3/snark"

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."
"In fairness to the woman (with whom I agree on very, very little) it is ..."

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • lofgren

    The state must slaughter these wicked reprobates or else they will continue to flood the world with their gloomy darkness.

    Brought to you by people whose moral education began and ended with Rainbow Bright.

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    because a gay pride event in Toronto had naked men in it

    Yup. And when August rolls around, the fire department will come to chip them apart.

     

    lofgren “Brought to you by people whose moral education began and ended with Rainbow Bright.”

    lofgren, also Care Bears. Maybe a little Captain Planet.

    Oddly, they always cheered for the antagonist.

  • Alverant

    Like father, like son … except for the “ex” part in “ex-terrorist”.

  • theguy

    Every time I think the right-wing degenerates have hit a new low, they sink further into slime. Are gay pride parades rated PG? I guess not, having never been to a (stereotypical) pride parade. Are the rantings of this drooling, fanged beast who thirsts for human blood rated PG? Fuck no!

    If Shitbat had any capacity for love, which the worthless bastard obviously does not, he’d “slaughter” himself and spare his intended victims.

  • regexp

    I see more nudity and outlandish behavior at a pro-football game than I ever do at a gay pride.

  • Chiroptera

    …and disgusting parents the “freedom” to force children to watch this sickness….

    I doubt that all that many kids need to be “forced” to watch naked people.

  • eric

    How fucking deranged do you have to be to declare that we must “slaughter” all gay people “for the purpose of love”?

    While I’m sure he’d support slaughtering gays too, in this particular case “these reprobates” seems to be referring to the kids’ parents (gay or straight), not the people actually in the parade.

    Makes total biblical sense. As the Noah and Canaan story illustrates, seeing older men naked is deserving of getting you cast out of the tribe and – up until this century or so – black skin.

  • Chiroptera

    …because a gay pride event in Toronto had naked men in it and some children saw it.

    Oh, is this what that auto mechanic in Grand Rapids was talking about?

    In that case, why was he letting his kid watch a gay pride event with naked people in it?

    What is truly cruel is giving freedom to caretakers and disgusting parents the “freedom” to force children to watch this sickness manifest before their innocent eyes.

    Meanwhile, parents who love their children feed them false and dangerous information concerning sex education and teach them to unthinkingly follow their national leaders into war.

  • k_machine

    Love is hate you say..?

  • moarscienceplz

    San Francisco has a run, called Bay to Breakers that thousands of people of all orientations run in and watch, and it is exempted from the anti-nudity law. So Fruit-Bat Shoebat would have to nuke the whole city to stop kids from seeing naked people. We also have a lot of clothing optional beaches, so I guess he’d want to destroy the whole Bay Area, which would probably bring down the internet. Seems like a lot of trouble.

  • http://onhandcomments.blogspot.com/ left0ver1under

    When I saw the word “nudity”, I was expecting it referred to people wearing thongs or other minimal swimsuits. Then I read and saw that people were actually nude in public and was a bit shocked.

    I was about to partially agree with criticizing the nudity until I read this during my search:

    The naked truth about Pride

    In defence of public nudity

    Emma Teitel

    March 15, 2014

    […]

    In 1981, on a taxpayer-funded mission estimated to have cost a quarter of a million dollars, police carrying crowbars and sledgehammers raided bath houses in Toronto’s gay village, forcing nude and nearly naked men onto the streets, where more than 300 LGBT people were arrested. Bik describes the night as “terrible.” Anyone wondering why some gay people at Pride are so “in your face” should look to events like these for an answer. There was a time when we weren’t in anyone’s face, but everyone was in ours. Hence the naked marching: When you can’t express yourself safely in private, there is no act of civil disobedience more powerful, I’d imagine, than doing so in public.

  • lofgren

    Fear of nudity was one of those things that people told me I would develop when I had children. Now I have children and I am not afraid.

    When you can’t express yourself safely in private, there is no act of civil disobedience more powerful, I’d imagine, than doing so in public.

    I think that has changed quite a bit. Like hippies growing their hair long, what was once an expression of rebellion has become mere fashion. Though there is still a political element to the brazenness of gay pride parades, it has been much dulled.

    But even as fashion, I am not opposed to it. Adults should not live their lives in fear of the moral opprobrium of children.

  • eric

    Fear of nudity was one of those things that people told me I would develop when I had children.

    How does that even make sense? I’d be afraid for the marchers from my kid more than anything else. Since he is a boy, it wouldn’t be men that would have to fear – he knows what boy parts look like. But if some women marched naked near him, they’d probably run the risk of having him run up, grab something, and ask “what’s this?”

  • http://www.clanfield.net janiceintoronto

    “The state must slaughter these wicked reprobates or else they will continue to flood the world with their gloomy darkness.”

    Well, if he’s talking about Toronto, then maybe he means the province…

    Can they do Rob Ford while they’re at it?

  • http://timgueguen.blogspot.com timgueguen

    Shoebat might have some fun if he ever tries to enter Canada. I would imagine calling for the murder of Canadians is probably grounds for not letting him in.

  • grumpyoldfart

    The state must slaughter these wicked reprobates

    And all over America, millions of “moderate” Christians are thinking to themselves, “If only I could live long enough to see that happen…”

  • busterggi

    “This fucking deranged.”

    No, this is religion at its finest.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1017276335 Strewth

    You never hear them talking about Mardi Gras and nudity, though.

  • Evan Brehm

    It is pretty amazing how utterly indistinguishable Shoebat is from the Jihadists he claims to hate.

  • lofgren

    eric@13

    I have to regard “making sense” as an entirely subjective description, but I am sure I don’t have to explain to you that some people seem to be almost pathologically afraid of the possible exposure of children to nudity of any kind, to the point that it is used as an argument against women breastfeeding in public. Apparently, though I haven’t verified this myself, nudity causes the brains of little children to spontaneously catch fire and tiny mushroom clouds to erupt out of their ears. That’s why we can’t risk decently thorough sex ed. One of those poor tots might see a nipple before they are old enough to build up a reistance, and then you have flaming brains splattered all over the back row.

  • dan4

    @7: Uh, Ed didn’t actually quote the “reprobates” part of Shoebat’s screed. He quoted the “purpose of love” part, which does indeed indicate Shoebat’s desire to have homosexuals murdered.

  • StevoR

    @ ^ lofgren : .. And how does one usually build up a resistence to something? 😉

    (Increasing exposure to small doses of the allergen / disease isn’t it?)

    PS. As for this sociopathic attention seeker Shoebat Jr To quote Bugs bunny : “Maaahh, what a maroon!”

  • StevoR

    @Strewth : “You never hear them talking about Mardi Gras and nudity, though.”

    Aren’t nudist camps and beaches still a thing in some places. here in South Oz we have at least one Adelaide beach – Maslins – where public nudity is legal. I gather quite a few nations even have nude (“clothing optional”) bike rides among other events. (Vague memory from watching news, not specifically gay events or anything sexual I don’t think.)

    Wonder if this fool has ever heard of the Adamites (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamites ) and a few similar successor Christian groups who believed in nudity incl. nude worship. “Funny” how inconsistent the religious nudity taboo is, really.

    Also imagine the ancient Celtic warriors in their woad traditional “armour” would have a few things to say about this Shoebat nut too were they around.

    @ 17. busterggi : “No, this is religion at its finest.”

    Only for a certain very opposite value of “finest’ I think.

  • StevoR

    Also :

    St. Paul himself .. as we learn from the sublime words of St. Paul. …

    St Paul, Saint fucking Paul. Formerly known as Saul aand converted from a guy who really did persecute and execute Christians as much as they want to persecute and execute teh Ghayyzze! Who are these guys really worshipping here and don’t they recall what Jesus – the guy they say they are trying to follow did when offered the chance to execute a sexual sinner? “Let he who is without ..” etc .. (Love thy neighbour – who is everyone else, no exceptions not even those bloody samaritan heretics! Final words “Forgive them father they know not what they do.) That guy who also hung around with sluts and, worse (?), tax-collectors. Who also apparently wasn’t married (or was he?) and lived together with twelve other men in like a hippy commune of the day kinda maybe.

    The state must slaughter these wicked reprobates or else they will continue to flood the world with their gloomy darkness.”

    Think gloomy and dark and I think of witch-burning puritans and intolerant religious fanatics not fabulous people following the rainbow lifestyle. Those who think the nude human body is something shameful tend not be exactly cheery happy types.

  • matty1

    It’s a good thing the Shoebats are against oppressive religious laws like Sharia

  • eric

    Lofgren @20:

    Apparently, though I haven’t verified this myself, nudity causes the brains of little children to spontaneously catch fire and tiny mushroom clouds to erupt out of their ears.

    No need for hyperbole the truth is probably bad enough. I expect most (but not all) parents would somewhat dislike the exposure, regardless of where they sit on the political spectrum. The difference is, liberal and conservative secular parents are going to react: ‘the kid’s going to get curious, ask questions, and question my answers in a never-ending string – and that’s going to be a hassle to deal with when I just want to watch the parade.” Religiously conservative parents react: ‘the kid’s going to get curious, ask questions, and question my answers in a never-ending string – and questioning my authority is bad and needs to be suppressed.’