I see people on my Facebook friends list share posts from Jim Wright, from a blog called Stonekettle Station, all the time. I’ve never found them particularly impressive, but this one is just a terrible set of arguments about Rand Paul and the Patriot Act. He seems to be so blinded by his hatred of Paul that he loses all ability to make rational arguments.
I agree that NSA domestic surveillance needs to be curtailed and placed under strict judicial review.
HOWEVER, the crap that Paul is currently pushing is nothing but pure distilled bullshit.
NSA domestic spying programs ARE NOT illegal. They were fully authorized by congress in the panicked wake of 911 via the Patriot Act and expanded under the Protect America Act. Warrantless wiretapping, mass collection, and total intrusion into global communications were authorized by Congress. The constitutional limitations put in place after Watergate, FISA requirements, and domestic intelligence oversight requirements were SPECIFICALLY dismissed by very same gun waving patriots who told us that fucking TORTURE was an acceptable tool for a civilized people.
This is really, really confused. He switches back and forth between “illegal” and “unconstitutional.” Both claims are incoherent. The fact that Congress passed the Patriot Act and reauthorized it does not mean that everything the NSA has done under cover of that law is actually legal. Indeed, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals just ruled a couple weeks ago that the cell phone metadata collection was clearly illegal even under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. Both the Bush and Obama administrations have read Section 215 to allow them to do pretty much anything they want, but the text of the law does not support that. So yes, those actions are illegal regardless of whether Congress passed the Patriot Act or not.
But then to make things really weird, he seems to think that the passage of the Patriot Act somehow overruled “constitutional limitations,” which a statute cannot do (nor were the new laws put in place in the 1970s that he refers to “constitutional limitations,” they were statutory ones. Statutes can overrule statutes). But it does raise the point that many of the things allowed by the Patriot Act, and mass data mining of any kind, are rather explicitly a violation of the 4th Amendment. Wright seems to accept this later, which makes the last part of that paragraph all the more baffling. It’s just gibberish.
Members of Congress, including Tea Party Patriots like Rand Paul and the head of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus herself, Michele Bachmann, oversaw these programs as part of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which SPECIFICALLY gave her authority over the CIA, NSA, DIA, and the rest of the U.S. intelligence community.
While the constitutionality of these programs has not been fully examined by the Supreme Court, they WERE fully authorized by Congress (on BOTH sides of the aisle, and the Tea Party) and two Presidents. They ARE are legal under the law and NO American including Rand Fucking Paul would have a problem with them if they only targeted dark skinned Muslims and don’t you goddamned pretend otherwise.
In point of fact, if these programs ARE illegal, then Rand Paul and his fellows in Congress on both sides of the aisle are guilty of conspiracy (in the legal sense of conspiring to break the law) by repeatedly funding this activity.
Uh, no. Rand Paul, and many other legislators, have consistently voted against this kind of surveillance and against funding it. To claim that they are “guilty of conspiracy” only shows that you have absolutely no idea what a legal conspiracy is. You’re just bloviating aimlessly.
While I am a huge advocate for returning to ALL intelligence gathering operations to strict FISA review and intense uncompromising oversight, the horseshit Rand Paul is currently shovelling is nothing but pure partisan grandstanding.
Partisan grandstanding? His stance is the exact opposite of the stance of the party he belongs to. In fact, during the fight Sunday night over all of this, he refused to even go in the room when the Senate Republicans were caucusing. You don’t seem to have any idea what the word “partisan” means either.
Look, there’s a lot to criticize Rand Paul about and I’ve criticized him a lot. But there are some issues, important ones, where he’s not only right, but where he’s virtually alone among Republicans in bring right on them. If you hate him so much that you let it force you to make ludicrous arguments like this, you need to turn in your rationality card at the nearest library.