SCOTUS Term Shows Obama’s Frequent Anti-Civil Liberties Positions

Here are some stats from the just-finished Supreme Court term that shows that President Obama continues to be out of step with liberal values on criminal justice and civil liberties issues. Especially on criminal justice issues, his position aligns with the conservatives more often than the liberals.

While the executive branch historically wins 60 to70 percent of its cases in the high court, this year the administration won only 38 percent. The court ruled against the administration in 13 of the 21 cases in which the federal government was a party, including Monday’s important decision curtailing the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate pollution from power plants.

The administration’s low win rate might seem to be the inevitable result of ideological disagreements between a liberal president and a conservative court. Yet the data suggest a more surprising story: The liberal justices voted against the Obama administration more often than the conservatives did.

The two justices who cast the most votes against the administration this term were Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, each opposing the administration in 71 percent of the cases. Justice Sonia Sotomayor isn’t far behind, voting against the administration 67 percent of the time. Who voted the most with the administration? Justices Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy, who each sided with the administration more often than not (in 52 percent of the cases)…

The court rejected the administration’s argument that fishermen can be prosecuted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying illegal catch; that people can be prosecuted for criminal threats on Facebook without proof of intent; that police can extend a traffic stop to bring in drug-sniffing dogs; that convicts can’t sell their firearms; that prosecutors don’t have to prove a defendant knew he had a controlled substance analogue; and that a provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act wasn’t unconstitutionally vague.

Add in the Supreme Court’s expansion of whistleblower protections and its refusal to allow the Board of Immigration Appeals to deport someone for unspecified drugs—both contrary to the administration’s arguments—and you have a remarkable number of cases this term promoting more liberal, less law-and-order outcomes than sought by the administration…

If the administration had taken less conservative positions on criminal justice cases, the president would likely have had a much better win rate overall.

I have long bashed Obama about his appalling positions on most civil liberties issues, especially on criminal justice matters. Even in cases that don’t involve the federal government at all, he can usually be counted on to file a brief taking the most right-wing, pro-police position on it, from drug-sniffing dogs to putting GPS units on someone’s car without a warrant to absolute prosecutorial immunity and many other cases. Together with his clearly unconstitutional positions on data mining, State Secrets Privilege, whistleblowers, this is why I would never support him if, as is being suggested now, he were nominated for the Supreme Court after he leaves the White House.

"" I think maybe what you are getting at with your statements about the Koran ..."

Yes, the Bible Does Say to ..."
"A young man I know explained his estrangement from his father by sharing his paternal ..."

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."
"We’re into the Smart justifications-Maxwell Smart, that is.Would you believe he chased teenage girls because ..."

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."
"Studying her linguistic patterns, I think Crokin tipped her hand on this one. She said ..."

Crokin: Hillary Clinton Sex Tape Will ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • theDukedog7 .

    [I have long bashed Obama about his appalling positions on most civil liberties issues, especially on criminal justice matters.]

    Yea. Obama’s been brutal on Lois Lerner for using the IRS to rig the 2012 election.

    [Even in cases that don’t involve the federal government at all, he can usually be counted on to file a brief taking the most right-wing, pro-police position]

    When the president of the Left Wing does something, why is it a “right wing” position. Why not “The right wing sometimes takes the most Left-wing, pro-police position”

    After all, most police states in the past century have been left-wing, not right-wing.

    [this is why I would never support him if, as is being suggested now, he were nominated for the Supreme Court after he leaves the White House.]

    Right. Hillary Clinton would be a much better choice for the court–think of the money she could raise by selling supreme court opinions to the highest bidder, like uranium.

  • http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Modusoperandi Modusoperandi

    from drug-sniffing dogs

    This baffles me. How do they even roll up the twenty?

  • http://www.thelosersleague.com theschwa

    “this is why I would never support him if, as is being suggested now, he were nominated for the Supreme Court after he leaves the White House.”

    I agree. But only because the traditional drift-to-the-left trajectory that SCOTUS justices take might make him into the brutal left-wing monster the GOP has making him out to be since 2007.

  • http://twitter.com/#!/TabbyLavalamp Tabby Lavalamp

    this is why I would never support him if, as is being suggested now, he were nominated for the Supreme Court after he leaves the White House.

    Yes, but would the loss of civil liberties be worth it for the right-wing meltdown that would follow such a move?

  • Michael Heath

    Modus:

    How do they even roll up the twenty?

    I don’t see any utility in awarding anymore Internets ever again.

  • ‘smee

    MH@5: I though Modus had them all anyway. I was going to apply to him for a new one since mine seems to be getting filled up by stupid commentary from DukeDog & theschwa…