Faith and Politics: ‘What’s Fair is Fair’ is not Fair Anymore by Randy S. Woodley

Ok, I have to admit I’m a history nerd. I read it, I watch it and I teach it professionally. Given the constant intersection of history and politics, I’m also quite interested in socio-political movements, trends and events. And I should say right up front, politically, I’m “all of the above”  on different issues, having voted on both sides and also for independents. But, in full disclosure, and this is a big ‘ol “but” for some of you; because of my experiences and my faith, at this time in my life I’m currently tracking with the Dems. I know, some folks coming from other places will chide me for this, but I’m pretty sure I’m old enough and mature enough in my faith to make up my own mind.

So what do I think about those of you who are rooting for those on the other side of the aisle, or even for those whose party doesn’t even get to sit near the aisle? I think that most of you are old enough, and mature enough in your faith to make up your mind as well. This is not really a post about conservative and progressive views on various issues. This is not even a post about which party is best for us at this time in our history–I’ve got my views–you’ve got yours–fine… This post is about how Christians have come to think about politics these days. Many people believe, (’cause I get the emails and comments all the time), that if a person makes a case for one side of an issue, they are  obligated to find fault with the other side. In other words, the issues are so politically charged these days that people won’t allow anyone to critique an issue without making the charge of partisanship. I do understand that almost every issue has partisan contexts, but please understand that sometimes the issue, is just the issue!

As followers of Jesus, we should not allow either party to dictate to us whether or not we can comment on an issue without it being considered partisan. We all sense the current political passion, things have gotten really crazy. I know both sides lie, both have their own problems, no one is perfect, yeah, yeah, yeah, that’s politics. But, does that mean we don’t engage in one side of an issue just because it is currently “owned” by one party or the other? Can you imagine Jesus not addressing the resurrection because the Pharisees and Sadducees had different views on it? How about trying to imagine Charles Finney not preaching abolition in the pre-Civil War period? or Angelina Grimke keeping silent on the Women’s Movement? or Sojourner Truth staying clear of both issues because she might be accused of partisan politics? Can you imagine in an effort not to seem partisan, MLK Jr. not addressing poverty or racism just because one party might include these issues as a part of their platform and another might not? As followers of Jesus, we need to be aware of the political implications but not allow them to silence us.

Today, something quite historic has changed in politics. The Dems are pretty much the same group as always, confused part of the time, both on and off message at different times. But, the big change since around 2008 has surfaced from within the current group of Republicans. If you’ve been observant, you know that there is no place left for moderates in the GOP. I could name about 10 examples of this off the top of my head but I realize, I’d just get some of you really mad. But then lately, even fairly neutral studies are affirming the far right swing in the GOP. This current polarization in politics has not been as great since perhaps the Civil War. Personally, I don’t believe that it is good for the country. A terrible atmosphere of intolerance seems to be re-surfacing that is moving race relations and how we think about the poor back to the 50s or 60s.

Christians are supposed to be the peacemakers of the world. That can only happen by first facing hard realities. As followers of Jesus, we should be concerned, share our views and take action. As citizens, we should demand that our politicians talk about their differences and learn to compromise–that has been the reality of politics in this country since the first Continental Congress. So how do we interpret the reality of this great divide?

In a recent Op. Ed. appearing in the Washington Post, Thomas E. Mann, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Norman J. Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute brought this to our attention,

…political scientists Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal, who have long tracked historical trends in political polarization, said their studies of congressional votes found that Republicans are now more conservative than they have been in more than a century. Their data show a dramatic uptick in polarization, mostly caused by the sharp rightward move of the GOP. If our democracy is to regain its health and vitality, the culture and ideological center of the Republican Party must change. In the short run, without a massive (and unlikely) across-the-board rejection of the GOP at the polls, that will not     happen. If anything, Washington’s ideological divide will probably grow after the 2012 elections.*

Now, what did they just say? They stated a simple fact that the GOP is moving to the right. Note, there are many long-time conservatives who would wholeheartedly agree–and they don’t like it. This is not necessarily a partisan issue, it’s just a matter of fact. I know someone will stop reading at this point and feel the need to tell me that the Democrats are just as bad-Please don’t! No need, I admit it. As I said earlier, they all lie, they are all both good and bad…but, the issue here is about the Republican Party’s swing to the right–stick with me for one more quote.

We understand the values of mainstream journalists, including the effort to report both sides of a story. But a balanced treatment of an unbalanced phenomenon distorts reality. If the political dynamics of Washington are unlikely to change anytime soon, at least we should change the way that reality is portrayed to the public.*

Did you see those words? “…a balanced treatment of an unbalanced phenomenon distorts reality.” Everyone wants to be fair, right? Especially Christians. We are so eager to be fair sometimes that we get confused about issues, historical movements and politics. We would like to think that when one side goes radical, both sides are equally radical but that is just not the reality of this season. Right now, history is taking place and it’s directly tied to politics. Whether or not you feel a swing to the far right is a good thing or perhaps you believe it is a bad thing, it is happening. This means that when we talk about issues, our tendency is going to be to speak from those polarized positions. This kind of debate almost always end up in a yelling match. Let’s not do that. Instead, lets look at the facts, and as hard as it is, let’s refrain from denigrating one another and commit to finding some compromises among ourselves. Who knows, maybe we can start a trend.

* http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/lets-just-say-it-the-republicans-are-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story_3.html

Dehumanizing the Other: Afghan Body Parts, Soldier Suicides, the Poor and the Evil Conservative Strategy By Randy Woodley

The first casualty of war is the truth. Tell a lie often enough and it becomes your truth. Urinating on dead bodies; cutting off fingers for sport; murdering women and children; night raid home invasions on civilians; and the most recent embarrassment of soldiers posing with dead body parts, are all possible during times of war because of the original lie that starts the war, which must include dehumanizing the enemy. It goes against human reason, after all, to kill another human being. In most of our minds, every person is afforded simple human dignity unless we have built a condemning scenario around their existence that makes them seem less than human. But, that is the necessary act of war—do not think of the enemy as equally human.

So what happens when soldiers try to regain their humanity? One of my friends who fought as a soldier in Vietnam once told me, “they gave me a rifle, told me to shoot anything that moves, including women and children, and now they expect me to act like a decent human being.” My friend was telling me that he no longer felt he was a decent human being. What does a soldier do with these feelings? I know what my friend did. Although the issue of soldier suicides, is complex, including re-deployment as a factor, a Congressional Report on Soldier Suicides notes that from 2005 to 2009, more than 1,100 service members committed suicide—an average of 1 suicide every 36 hours. This is tragic…

When soldiers return home, one of the recurring themes of recovery has to do with the “re-humanization” process. It begs the question: “coming from a survival mode and with such deep prejudice towards the enemy, how does one regain their former humanity?” I do not wish in anyway to minimize what our veterans have experienced. Many of them have sacrificed greatly and deserve our thanks and when needed, our help. And, there is a difference between hating someone and actually killing someone, although it’s tough to do the latter without the former. But I don’t think we need to have been a soldier to experience the kind of dehumanization I’m talking about.

Have you ever hated someone or some people group? I mean hate to the point where you feel that person or that people group does not have the same right to live as you or perhaps to live as well as you? And then, have you been converted from such hate filled thoughts? It’s an embarrassing position, and it causes us to feel extreme remorse and shame for feeling that way about other people. Recovery from hate may be the ultimate experience in humility, one from which some people can never recover.

[Read more...]

Strange Christianity Made in America: Part III by Randy Woodley

I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ! -Gandhi

Christians in America are infamous for being so unlike Jesus. I like the bumper sticker that says, “When Jesus said love your enemies I think he probably meant don’t kill them.” Ever wonder how Christians went from loving their enemies to killing them? We love to blame it all on Constantine, and true enough, he contributed to the problem, but I think the problem goes deeper and farther back—all the way to the Apostle Paul, or at least to the way we view him and his role in the Scriptures—our hermeneutic of Paul.

Don’t get me wrong, Paul was probably a solid guy, but (and he’d be the first to admit) he doesn’t even hold a candle to Jesus. Over the centuries Paul’s words have been used to sanction everything from American slavery to the oppression of women to 5 Point Calvinism. So, why do we give the words of Paul and the words of Jesus equal weight? I think mostly our hermeneutic fails to deal with our worldview and our own “non-objective” perceptions of reality.

I don’t consider myself a biblical expert, but neither am I an armchair scholar. I have all the right creds; the required biblical and theological training, all the right degrees, and I have put in the time it takes to understand how complex this question really is, and most importantly, I could be wrong. I’m not offering a simple solution, just making the observation that some things are very wrong with our traditional hermeneutic of Paul’s writings and that we pay too little attention to Jesus.

The Apostle Paul was correct when he said we all “see through a glass darkly.” What he didn’t say is that in the right light, glass reflects like a mirror. When looking through our own glass lens we bring more of our own worldview and preconceived notions to the Scriptures than we would care to admit. Having bias is unavoidable and it is natural, so why can’t we admit to the deeper levels of our own bias? I think there are several reasons. Identifying and admitting them is the first step in a long process of developing a fresh hermeneutic. [Read more...]

Strange Christianity Made in America: Part II by Randy Woodley

The customs of the Nacirema, a still very poorly understood tribal group, came to the attention of anthropologists about forty years ago. They are a North American group living in the territory roughly between the Cree and the Tarahumare tribal groups. Little is known of their origin, although tradition states that they came from the east.

In the mid-seventies a group of anthropologists formalized the studies of this very strange and powerful culture. I’ve dusted off an old copy of their studies from my shelf to remind myself how this tribe became so powerful and, if they have changed much? You may rightly ask the question, “Why study the exotic tribes like the Nacirema?” I think there are things we can learn about ourselves that are easier learned from a distance. Looking at other cultures helps us to compare and contrast our own cultures. For example, like us, Nacirema culture is characterized by a highly developed market economy, which has evolved from having a rich natural habitat.

Here are some of the anthropologists observations concerning this strange tribe. [Read more...]