SBTS Panel on “Revisiting Inerrancy”

Last week at Southern Seminary there was a very interesting panel discussion on “Revisiting Inerrancy” featuring Al Mohler, Denny Burk, Bruce Ware, Gregg Allison, and Russell Moore.

Quite an enjoyable segment, many references to Peter Enns and Kenton Sparks, the panelist obviously take a conservative theological approach to the matter, and the best part is that it provides a good overview of the theological substructure in which inerrancy is said to be embedded in. Worth a listen when it comes to Battle for the Bible debates.

"Splits and schism's per se in the church are never to be celebrated but unfortunately ..."

A Reforming Catholic Confession
"It's all about JESUS CHRIST, the only begotten "SON OF GOD!" What mankind is saying ..."

Can You Pass a Christology Quiz?
"The Great Schism is not celebrated in either Catholic or Orthodox Churches. I think Protestants ..."

A Reforming Catholic Confession
"It's a real pity that Nanos and Zetterholm do not engage with Stephen Carlson's work, ..."

Latest Issue of JSPL

Browse Our Archives



What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Tony Stiff

    People who agree with one another talking about people not present that they don’t agree with.

    When it comes to matters of controversy – either in the church or in the academy – I find these types of panels rarely helpful. More times than not they only function in self-confirming and self-appeasing ways rather than fostering an ecumenical spirit that could serve the mission of the church.