Ambrosiaster on “works of the law”

I’ve been reading Gerald Bray’s excellent translation of Ambrosiaster’s commentary on Romans and 1-2 Corinthians.

In my reading, Ambrosiaster’s description of works of the law really jumps out at you:

In Rom 3:21, Ambrosiaster defines“law” as “law of the sabbath, the circumcision, the new moon, and revenge.” Then in Rom 3:28 he defines “works of the law” as “circumcision or new moons or the veneration of the sabbath.”

Maybe Jimmy Dunn has been channeling a double portion of the spirit of Ambrosiaster all these years.

"Thanks, Michael, for this exposition of the covenants. If one sees a spectrum of (non)covenant ..."

Why I Believe in Monocovenantalism
"Paul was conflicted about the Jews. On the one hand they rejected Jesus for the ..."

Did Paul ever try to convert ..."
"So, why does this matter interest you? To what in the present does it attach?"

Did Paul ever try to convert ..."
"Kim, the string of Hellenistic cities from Damascus to Babylon also had significant Jewish communities."

Did Paul ever try to convert ..."

Browse Our Archives



What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Nijay

    This reminds me of Mark Reasoner’s Romans in Full Circle -I think he examined Ambrosiaster there as well…

  • Scott Irenaeus Watson

    Or the Western Christian theological tradition had drunk from the well of the Augustinian theological tradition (and its trajectory) for so long that it elided this understanding into a “biblical” understanding. Overall, the concerns of the broad Patristic tradition in these matters are in line with the so called NPP, so that it should be termed the real ‘Old Perspective’.