Where Evangelicals and Bart Ehrman Agree

Over at Stand to Reason, Amy Hall has a good piece showing what Bart Ehrman and Evangelicals actually agree on concerning Jesus and divinity. With all the hoopla and debate – which to be frank I have deliberately cultivated in many ways – I think it is important to stress that not everything that Bart says about christological origins is disagreeable. Its a good summary.

"Thanks, Michael, for this exposition of the covenants. If one sees a spectrum of (non)covenant ..."

Why I Believe in Monocovenantalism
"Paul was conflicted about the Jews. On the one hand they rejected Jesus for the ..."

Did Paul ever try to convert ..."
"So, why does this matter interest you? To what in the present does it attach?"

Did Paul ever try to convert ..."
"Kim, the string of Hellenistic cities from Damascus to Babylon also had significant Jewish communities."

Did Paul ever try to convert ..."

Browse Our Archives



What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Just reading his book myself. Here are a couple things I agree with.

    Ehrman seems to believe the early believers shared the gospel by telling stories about Jesus (p91-92). I think he’s right where many protestants are wrong on what sharing the gospel is about.

    He has also noted quite well what most Jews believed in the first century. There is one God, who is creator of heaven and earth. He has chosen Israel to be his special people and given them the law. He talks about Jewish apocalypticism saying most Jews were convinced that God was very soon going to intervene in the world and overthrow the forces of evil and usher in his kingdom (p98-99). Strangely he rejects this in p105. I wonder if he reads the prophecies in the OT?