Status Quæstionis on Qumran Studies

There is a lengthy review by James H. Charlesworth over at RBL on a new book about Qumran and the Scrolls. But in the review, Charlesworth sums up what he thinks are the six basic conclusions most Qumranologists would concur about:

The leading Qumranologists would tend to agree on the following six conclusions: (1) Qumran existed during the Hasmonean period (an inclusive claim because it admits the possibility of pre-100 “Essene” life at Qumran and can mean anytime from 152 to 67); 61 (2) the Qumran Scrolls and archaeology must be examined together in assessing Qumran history and archaeology and without misleading presuppositions; (3) ‘Ain Feshkha is related to Qumran; (4) some of the Qumran Scrolls (maybe less than ten of the one thousand known almost always in fragments) were composed at Qumran or finally edited there; (5) one room should be recognized as a scriptorium; and (6) the strict and probably celibate branch of the Essenes most likely lived at Qumran.

See more here.

""I am and have been talking about the original concerning which the current reconstruction might ..."

A Peer Reviewed Journal Takes Down ..."
"I have already clarified with Ehrman's own words that he is speaking about a reconstruction ..."

A Peer Reviewed Journal Takes Down ..."
""globally influential power structure"what the..?a string of words with no meaningI don't see how the ..."

Women Seminary Professors: A Response to ..."
"Two lectures have been delivered so far, but I'm not seeing any of them listed ..."

N.T. Wright’s 2018 Gifford Lectures

Browse Our Archives



What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment