Longing for paradise: another view on heaven.

Road to heaven

We long for paradise.

It’s as if something deep down cries out within us and reminds of how it used to be, or at least how its meant to be. We long for a state of existence where pain isn’t in our vocabulary. Where strife, war, anger, lust, hurt don’t have the last word. We are told from early on that Adam and Eve* were banned from this, that they were expelled from the Garden because of taking what wasn’t theirs’.

For some all we need to do is simply turn our televisions on and skip through the channels to discover that the world is not as its meant to be. For others, they just need to look back over the last year to find that something isn’t right.

There is a balance that has been upset.

There is even more sadness in the person who has recently lost someone dear to them, all they need to do is peer inside their broken heart to accept the reality that all is not well. We can call this place or these series of experience, hell.

It seems some Jews had a different concept of heaven. The place where the exact opposite of the above occurs.

A state of perfected bliss.

From what we’ve been told this place is already being made for us. From what we’ve been told it’s paved with the streets of gold and some of us might even get our wings. Now, I don’t want to counter the traditional orthodox idea of heaven as a place out there, that is possible, however, I do want to shed some light on the Jewish mindset towards heaven.

Judgement Day has been used to describe this one-day-when event where God like a gun-slinger comes in and no only saves the day but also sits down in his gown and wig and judges the quick and the dead, the saved and the unsaved. The ancient Jews understood this to be prophetic rhetoric that didn’t pertain to a one-day-when scenario, but spoke of a state of being where all of God’s dreams for the world come true. Where poverty is no longer present. Where war isn’t necessary for peace. Where love wins over hate and indifference. Judgement Day was a moment-by-moment event that they as a people worked towards.

In the Genesis narrative when the author opens the story with “In the beginning God created the heavens…” the word used there in the hebrew is ‘shamayim’, it means sky. It speaks of the firmament and is translated ‘the heights’. It alludes to the space between us and what is above us.

the other side

One jewish writer describes shamayim in its folkloric context and applies it to our daily lives “The paradigm that we are bidden to follow is the “shamayim,” the place where different forces manage to live together in peace. It is nearly impossible for us to agree with one another all the time. But it is possible to argue “le-sheim shamayim,” in a way that allows us to maintain peace and harmony in our homes, communities and the nation at large, despite the many disagreements that threaten to divide us.”

Some Jews didn’t hold to the traditional end time theories, they believed in something entirely different. They called it the Messianic Age, others believe it to be under another name, the Kingdom of God. This belief in the Messianic Age has been stepped in the Jewish psyche, we see this in the later writing of the prophets.

How each Israelite follower interpreted that is still to be discussed and discovered. But, some believed the messianic age was a moment in time when humanity would intentionally choose to put aside our warring differences, embrace our diversity as a God-given thing and learn to live together in harmony. As I said above, this is also another term for the Kingdom of God, one in the same.

Maybe heaven is less about an up there and more about what we’re doing here. Maybe its about how we treat those in need, much like in the short stories of the Rich Man and Lazarus and The Good Samaritan. Maybe heaven is walking into a war-torn situation and bringing peace.

Maybe heaven is bringing food in the midst of hunger or not allowing for poverty to have the last word.

Heaven is something we bring here. Now.

Paradise is the belief that what is now isn’t what was meant to be, and that what is meant to be can be realized by how we live our lives in connection to one another. Heaven is the defiant hope inspired by the potential of what could be. Heaven is humanity learning to live how Christ demonstrated. Heaven is humanity learning to live in their diversity and ushering in a new age of heaven on earth.

*This is but one of many interpretations, click here to find another take on the Adam and Eve story.

Source: As we know from the story of creation in Parashat Bereishit, the sky, the expanse which separates between the “upper waters” and “lower waters,” was initially called “raki’a,” but God then assigned it the name “shamayim” (Bereishit 1:6-8). The term “raki’a,” the Keli Yakar claims, refers to its basic function of separating between the heavenly and earthly domains. The term “shamayim,” by contrast, means just the opposite – unifying and merging two opposing elements. Chazal explain the word “shamayim” as a combination of the words “eish” (fire) and “mayim” (“water”), and it alludes to the fact that whereas here on earth fire and water resist each other, in the heavenly realm they coexist harmoniously. Thus, the term “shamayim” alludes to the peaceful coexistence between different forces and opposing elements, as opposed to “raki’a,” which signifies division and strife.

The myth/story behind the development of the ‘Heavens’ (Shamayim)

Jewish Superheroes: A look at an oppressed people

Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.
Martin Luther King, Jr.

(This is a deeper/scholastic look at the development of the Jewish belief system, rather than a ‘theological’ one)

Myths are stories with a deeper meaning. Myths are narratives with a culturally deep hearbeat that lives beyond its own shelf-life. Myths are important to any cultures existence and growth. Myths also tend to demonstrate something larger at work. A theme. A deity. An ethic. A truth. A love. Things that get lost in words tend to find themselves in myths, because the story itself is too powerful for everyday words.

If you look at the Jewish people (first and foremost) as a group of people committed to their myth (as defined above) than you see a people deeply in-tune with the world above them and around them. A poetic people, a people who trust their myth. As I said, their myth made sense of the world around them.

The Jewish people (in and outside of biblical record) were an oppressed people. If you put this in terms of highschool. They were the ‘nerds’ of the world. They were the essential outsider, the geeks who never got the girl. Their story (in the Torah, Gemara, Mishnah, Tanya and others) out of that oppression seems to be quite document in their literature. During their development as a people, one man stood apart in the eyes of their deity. He was chosen to be the progenitor, or the first Jewish Superhero of the race of this ‘holy nation’.

(Did Abraham live?; I am not sure that question matters as much as why he lived in the minds of his people, if he didn’t live that is).

Here we have an oppressed people who are looking outwards.

Who are trying to make sense of their oppression.

They need someone to come along and save the day. And so their history is riddled with Superheroes and heroines who represent their resolve to rise above that oppression. From Abraham we go to Joseph, who was oppressed by his own family/his own people, and Yahweh stepped in and orchestrated certain events in life so that he could rise above being oppressed. Then we a Judge named Deborah, who lives within a culture whereby if you are female you are automatically oppressed. She stands up and fights for her people even when the man wouldn’t. Than we have Samson, who in the fashion of a ‘Romeo & Juliet story’, falls in love with the enemy who ends up injuring him. At this point, he is the oppressed (a representation of Israel perhaps?); then Yawheh comes in and gives Samson (the ultimate Arnold Schwarzenegger of his day) a bit more strength to win the day for his people and smash their enemies to pieces. Then you have the uberman of superheroes, albeit flawed, King David the Giant Fighter. He came up through the ranks, not even in the army but as a helpless shepherd (it’s important to remember here, that when we first catch up with the Jews in the Torah, for the most part, they see themselves as traveling shepherds) who ends up defending an oppressed country.

As time went on, Israel popped in and out of the oppressed narrative, but for the most part they were the oppressed. Then the age of the prophets came. There was talk of a Messiah. A bruised reed. A suffering servant. Who was to come and free Israel of its oppression from others. This was the ultimate superhero, this was the political and militaristic savior come to ’save the day’. (Now, when you start diving into interpretation of who or what this Messiah was meant to be, there are interpretations across the board – one of many was that it was a person who was meant to come; some others thought it was yet another metaphor (myth?) for Israel itself).

There is also the choice of deity. There were a pantheon of gods to choose from. They happened to worship the god Yahweh who was in the council of El (Elohim-this shows up in Genesis). Yahweh was the god of war. He was a jealous god. He wanted all praise and worship for himself. He was the ultimate God who would have been a god of the oppressed. He was the warrior god they needed to be their voice for oppression. He was the god who would send them on divinely sanctioned wars to fight their oppression. This deity promised them a new land, their own. For an oppressed people who were known by their nomadic lifestyle, this would be a perfect land, a promised land. An Eden of sorts. A land ‘flowing with milk and honey.’ This god of war was going to make sure they got it and kept it.

For those who believed that the Messiah was a person, they were waiting in hope that this savior was going to rescue them from any current or future oppression. He was going to be a leader. They waited for him to come for year and years. Finally one day, a small-town Rabbi pops on the scene and starts talking about a new kind of Kingdom. He starts about how this new way of doing things would upset the natural order of things.

This is the message they were waiting for.

Hoping for.

This Rabbi did things backwards, he approached people to be his disciples (rather than the prescripted opposite); he treated others with compassion and open-arms. He was a different. He was going to upset the system, just not in the way they thought. His friends became to close to him, most of his friends were Jewish. They had heard of the thousands of years of oppression, some from their own grandparents. They begin to see this Jesus of Nazareth in a whole new light, they begin to see him as the ultimate superhero.

Even bigger than David.

Bigger than the giant-killer.

He was going to save them from the oppressive regime of Rome. He was going to usher in a new world where the Jews were going to rule the world (‘and the government will be upon his shoulders’), they were going to at least be the center of it, if not the former. Jesus was now the Jewish uberman (that Nietzche coined). He was the Messiah for the oppressed who was going to usher in the New Messianic Age they hade been waiting for for centuries.

Leaving the the gardens of our own making: a different view on the adam and eve story

desire longs for a less mediated reality. – anna smith
Delight yourself in the LORD and he will give you the desires of your heart. — David

I have this old pair of shoes. The other day as it was pouring down with rain (as it does in England!) I found out the hard way that the shoe had a hole. Needless to say, my right foot was baptised, unbelievably so!

My shoes weren’t always filled with holes. They weren’t always scuffed up, they used to be new. They used to live on a rack at a sporting goods store. My shoes weren’t always on the rack in a store either, they used to live in a factory overseas. And it goes on…it was always like that. This could be the same with many things in our lives.

desire can simply be defined as something that lives within us that wants to get out. something that reminds us what it feels like to be alive. according to author Anna Smith (quote above), desire is this longing for us not be mediated. But, what do mean by mediation?

Mediation can mean a lot of things. In terms of philosophy, it could be something that’s objective (for example, some people believe in objective truth). In terms of life experience, mediation could be control (i am using control in the bad sense, in the sense of oppression or abuse). In terms of theology, it could be theological colonization (making one’s theology everyone’s else’s). There are a whole lot more definitions for what mediation could mean depending upon context, but the three above will help us shed some light on a story we might have become too comfortable with.

We tend to look at the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden as a story of expulsion. As a story about two people who got it wrong. A story about humanity missing the point. A story about just how bad we could really hurt ourselves. I think there is truth in that version, but the Jews (the authors;compilers) thought that you could get up to 70 different interpretations per verse in the Torah (the Old Testament); but what if the story is the opposite of what we have come to believe it to mean? (The story itself was 22,000 years old by the time the Jewish scribes discovered it on a cylinder seal, and they added the interpretations to make sense of one version of cosmology, this is good to keep in mind when approaching such a story.)

What if what Adam and Eve wanted and needed was beyond the Garden? What if in their desire(s) was this hunger not to be mediated by the dangers of dualism (‘right’ and ‘wrong’; this goes here and that goes there). What if their desire for God was the same as desire itself? What if God had put it there all along?
If that’s true, then the Garden of Eden becomes a story about a God who is willing and isn’t afraid of his creation asking questions. It also becomes a story of a God who is committed to the development of his people becoming and discovering who they are meant to be. So, maybe the typical ‘theology’ behind the story of Adam and Eve might be a bit misleading. Maybe.

The typical theology says that God doesn’t trust humanity. That God is afraid of his creation. That he fears us. That He needs to intervene before we mess things up. When you look at scripture, God spends more time on assisting in the development of his people rather than decrying their inability to ever get to where he thinks they should be. (some might quote the prophets, but remember these were prophets who were oppressed filtering their theology of God through their oppression and if that’s true, than they need a people who are almost literally armed and ready for battle and who are ‘holy’ and different).

This new view says that God is a God who is committed to our development. He is committed to journeying and isn’t afraid where that might take us. That he intentionally implanted the desire for us all to not want to be mediated. That when Jesus talks about freedom, he is talking about a God who believes we are capable to live out of that very freedom. This is an empowering God who encourages us and pushes us beyond the ‘Gardens’ of our own making.