Hoax of Kong?

Thanks to Jeff for tipping me off to this report on how Peter Jackson’s King Kong remake has allegedly already blossomed into another back-to-back-to-back trilogy project, just like The Lord of the Rings. I suspect this is just one really elaborate April Fool’s Day joke, but even if it is, it’s still quite entertaining.

One thing that does appear to be genuine about the video clip linked at the other site is Peter Jackson’s rather shocking weight loss, accentuated by the fact that he isn’t wearing any glasses. If he really is tackling another instant trilogy, I’d be a wee bit concerned for the effect it may have on his health.

"I remind you, YOU REPLIED to my post that is over 2 years old.I gave ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."
"I believe I have a gut full of your filthy protestants minds that you cannot ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."
"Already replied about archangels. The bible mentions ONLY Michael the archangel in Jude 1:9. If ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."
"Genius I asked you to tell me the names of God's Arch Angel's and while ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/14715376140228118442 Jeffrey Overstreet

    It was nice of you not to reveal to the general public that I actually FELL for this hoax at first. It was the line about The Chronicles of Riddick that made me stop and go, “Waaaaaait a minute.”

    I mean, why *wouldn’t* Universal want to make Kong sequels?

  • Thom

    I think they should have pushed it further and claimed Jackson was going to turn all his previous films into trilogies. Dead Alive, Bad taste, the Frighteners, Forgotten Silver, Etc.

    Two obvious I am sure, but you could have some fun with mock titles for his earlier work.