My ACLJ colleague Jordan Sekulow’s Washington Post piece making the case for Christian support for immigration enforcement reminded me of a disturbing but very real trend in American evangelicalism — a perceptible drift left on economic freedom, immigration, and the environment. The drift is obvious amongst Christian young people. In recent years, I’ve spoken to thousands of young evangelicals, and skepticism of free market economics is at an all-time high. Many have read books by Ron Sider or Shane Claiborne or have seen Jim Wallis in campus debates and defend our nation’s drift towards European economic and social models. Others uncritically accept environmental alarmism and see the green movement not as a competing religion (which it often is) but instead as a model for so-called environmental stewardship.
My fears were confirmed at a recent conference where analysts were breaking down the voting behavior of counties by religious composition. Regarding life, the more evangelical a county, the greater its tendency to support the pro-life cause. The progression was, in fact, dramatic. Regarding economic freedom, on the other hand, while the more evangelical counties did ultimately tend to support the free market, the difference was well within the margin of error. In other words, the evangelical community is convinced on life. Economics? Not so much.
Why? Optics matter. When progressive Christians address evangelicals, they wear their heart for the poor on their sleeve. They convincingly point out the vast number of scriptures commanding believers to care for the “least of these,” and they’re quite effective at pointing to the BMWs in the parking lot even as they show slides of abject poverty in Africa. Market defenders speak the rhetoric of prosperity. Progressives speak the rhetoric of compassion (not to beat a dead horse, but that’s certainly one reason by George Bush coined “compassionate conservativism.”)