<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FFRF Supreme Court Oral Argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/02/28/ffrf-supreme-court-oral-argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/02/28/ffrf-supreme-court-oral-argument/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/02/28/ffrf-supreme-court-oral-argument/#comment-7031</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/02/28/ffrf-supreme-court-oral-argument/#comment-7031</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s a link to a Scotusblog analysis of the case:

http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/02/analysis_flast.html#more

also, more links to media on the case here:

http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/02/roundup_80.html

unfortunately Scotusblog seem to think that there is going to be some overturning of precedent to make it harder for taxpayers to sue, although not as far as the Government would like.

Ah well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s a link to a Scotusblog analysis of the case:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/02/analysis_flast.html#more" rel="nofollow">http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/02/analysis_flast.html#more</a></p>
<p>also, more links to media on the case here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/02/roundup_80.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/02/roundup_80.html</a></p>
<p>unfortunately Scotusblog seem to think that there is going to be some overturning of precedent to make it harder for taxpayers to sue, although not as far as the Government would like.</p>
<p>Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXatheist</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/02/28/ffrf-supreme-court-oral-argument/#comment-7021</link>
		<dc:creator>TXatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/02/28/ffrf-supreme-court-oral-argument/#comment-7021</guid>
		<description>Thanks for keeping us updated Hemant.  I hope we are still doing this when Newdow goes to trial for the Pledge case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping us updated Hemant.  I hope we are still doing this when Newdow goes to trial for the Pledge case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 190/198 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 07:07:41 -->
