<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nightline Debate Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; Sam Harris and Rabbi David Wolpe</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-108114</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; Sam Harris and Rabbi David Wolpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-108114</guid>
		<description>[...] Nightline did the same thing (with very similar words). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nightline did the same thing (with very similar words). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27152</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;keyboard theologians&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ROFLMBO!  That&#039;s good, Richard, but I wouldn&#039;t give them THAT much credit.  Theologian is an overstatement.  They aren&#039;t even that!  They don&#039;t even study the darn thing to actually know what it&#039;s all about!  Trust me, I know one is not finished with me yet, because they can&#039;t handle the truth or even comprehend what I&#039;ve told them because it&#039;s not what THEIR church TOLD them.

Like I said, they are afraid to actually study it for fear they will become like us and loose their salvation.  *rolling eyes* I still say the truth sets you free and I don&#039;t mean it the way the religous do.  Most of them don&#039;t have a clue as to what they are really talking about.  They THINK they do and they THINK they know more than we do because they have the misconception that we don&#039;t study the Bible.  They really need to take a surf over to CFI and alike to get their eyes openned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>keyboard theologians</p></blockquote>
<p>ROFLMBO!  That&#8217;s good, Richard, but I wouldn&#8217;t give them THAT much credit.  Theologian is an overstatement.  They aren&#8217;t even that!  They don&#8217;t even study the darn thing to actually know what it&#8217;s all about!  Trust me, I know one is not finished with me yet, because they can&#8217;t handle the truth or even comprehend what I&#8217;ve told them because it&#8217;s not what THEIR church TOLD them.</p>
<p>Like I said, they are afraid to actually study it for fear they will become like us and loose their salvation.  *rolling eyes* I still say the truth sets you free and I don&#8217;t mean it the way the religous do.  Most of them don&#8217;t have a clue as to what they are really talking about.  They THINK they do and they THINK they know more than we do because they have the misconception that we don&#8217;t study the Bible.  They really need to take a surf over to CFI and alike to get their eyes openned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27122</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 17:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27122</guid>
		<description>Oh please not another &quot;debate&quot; debacle.  That was a half hour infomercial for those two frauds and their videos.  Now Friendly Atheist has been invaded by trolls, self-styled saviors, keyboard theologians, pseudo scientists and drive-by witnesses all wanting to be right rather than be curious, all &lt;em&gt;telling&lt;/em&gt; us what we think, believe, feel and do.  Nobody is &lt;em&gt;asking&lt;/em&gt; us.   I accidentally knocked down a wasp nest once... If there&#039;s another farce on TV like that one I&#039;ll be out of here until the swarm goes away.

It&#039;s time WE frame the discussion here.  We do too much reactive responding to their challenges and not enough challenging of our own.  Stop dickering with them over scripture, arguing over science and superstition.  We should refer all the Christian newcomers who have shown up here to &quot;do us good&quot; in the last two days to &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/12/2020-story-on-the-power-of-faith/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this posting only.&lt;/a&gt; Don&#039;t talk to them anywhere else or about anything else.  The abuse of non believers is the shameful hypocrisy that the pious either ignore or give only brief lip service to.  I&#039;m sick and tired of Christians tollerating it.

Let&#039;s challenge all these loving Christians who are so often sorry to hear that their brethren are treating atheists like dirt to DO something effective about it, to step up and actually stop other Christians from all the abuse, rather than say, &quot;Well gee I&#039;m sorry to hear about that, but anyway back to my point about how you atheists are wrong...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please not another &#8220;debate&#8221; debacle.  That was a half hour infomercial for those two frauds and their videos.  Now Friendly Atheist has been invaded by trolls, self-styled saviors, keyboard theologians, pseudo scientists and drive-by witnesses all wanting to be right rather than be curious, all <em>telling</em> us what we think, believe, feel and do.  Nobody is <em>asking</em> us.   I accidentally knocked down a wasp nest once&#8230; If there&#8217;s another farce on TV like that one I&#8217;ll be out of here until the swarm goes away.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time WE frame the discussion here.  We do too much reactive responding to their challenges and not enough challenging of our own.  Stop dickering with them over scripture, arguing over science and superstition.  We should refer all the Christian newcomers who have shown up here to &#8220;do us good&#8221; in the last two days to <a href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/12/2020-story-on-the-power-of-faith/" rel="nofollow">this posting only.</a> Don&#8217;t talk to them anywhere else or about anything else.  The abuse of non believers is the shameful hypocrisy that the pious either ignore or give only brief lip service to.  I&#8217;m sick and tired of Christians tollerating it.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s challenge all these loving Christians who are so often sorry to hear that their brethren are treating atheists like dirt to DO something effective about it, to step up and actually stop other Christians from all the abuse, rather than say, &#8220;Well gee I&#8217;m sorry to hear about that, but anyway back to my point about how you atheists are wrong&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27095</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 15:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27095</guid>
		<description>Siamang, there is a problem with having another debate in which they try to prove the existance of God...  Neither of them are theologians, they&#039;ve never done any scholarly study on the matter either.  So anything they say will be bogus.  With the knowledge I have, I can use the Bible to show JC is a myth.  I doubt I can use it to debate the existence or non-existence of a deity, BUT I can possibly show the definition of god is a man-made concept and that Judaism and Christianity evolved from various myths.  If Kirk and Ray are anything like some people around here, I can more than likely run circles around them theologically wise.  I know that the theologians I know, could run circles around them and leave them in the dirt looking like idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siamang, there is a problem with having another debate in which they try to prove the existance of God&#8230;  Neither of them are theologians, they&#8217;ve never done any scholarly study on the matter either.  So anything they say will be bogus.  With the knowledge I have, I can use the Bible to show JC is a myth.  I doubt I can use it to debate the existence or non-existence of a deity, BUT I can possibly show the definition of god is a man-made concept and that Judaism and Christianity evolved from various myths.  If Kirk and Ray are anything like some people around here, I can more than likely run circles around them theologically wise.  I know that the theologians I know, could run circles around them and leave them in the dirt looking like idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AV</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27022</link>
		<dc:creator>AV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 07:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27022</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Kirk Cameron said this in his introduction:

    &lt;blockquote&gt;As a former atheist, myself, and evolutionist, I want to pull back the curtain and show that the number one reason many people do not believe in God is not because of a lack of evidence, but because of a theory that many scientists today consider to be a fairytale for grown-ups.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Kirk thinks that being a &quot;former atheist&quot; gives him privileged access to Teh Atheist Hive Mind? What an arrogant jerk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><br />
<blockquote>Kirk Cameron said this in his introduction:</p>
<blockquote><p>As a former atheist, myself, and evolutionist, I want to pull back the curtain and show that the number one reason many people do not believe in God is not because of a lack of evidence, but because of a theory that many scientists today consider to be a fairytale for grown-ups.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p></i></p>
<p>Kirk thinks that being a &#8220;former atheist&#8221; gives him privileged access to Teh Atheist Hive Mind? What an arrogant jerk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27020</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 06:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27020</guid>
		<description>Larry, you said this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
 God knows it is impossible to truely be an atheist. He has made himself known to all mankind. He has set eternity in every mans heart. We are all without excuse for denying Him. What can be known of God is evident in all He has created. He won’t force anyone to beleive in, rely and trust in Him. It’s up to each individual.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I find it interesting that you Christians claim to be the people of God and say you want to do his will, but you don&#039;t follow his example.  

Not only does God not &quot;force anyone to believe in . . . Him,&quot; he does not preach at people; he does not badger people on blogs; he does not ridicule people for not believing in him; he doesn&#039;t try to convert them; he doesn&#039;t try to undermine the teaching of evolution in our schools; he doesn&#039;t try to pack our Supreme Court so as to repeal Roe V. Wade; he&#039;s not railing against stem-cell researchers; he appears not to give a damn about what gay people do in their bedrooms; and he has expressed no opinions on a host of issues from authoritarianism and militarism among conservative Christians to Britney Spears exposing her pathetic paw paw in public!  Why don&#039;t you be a real follower of Jesus and follow his example?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, you said this:</p>
<blockquote><p>
 God knows it is impossible to truely be an atheist. He has made himself known to all mankind. He has set eternity in every mans heart. We are all without excuse for denying Him. What can be known of God is evident in all He has created. He won’t force anyone to beleive in, rely and trust in Him. It’s up to each individual.</p></blockquote>
<p>I find it interesting that you Christians claim to be the people of God and say you want to do his will, but you don&#8217;t follow his example.  </p>
<p>Not only does God not &#8220;force anyone to believe in . . . Him,&#8221; he does not preach at people; he does not badger people on blogs; he does not ridicule people for not believing in him; he doesn&#8217;t try to convert them; he doesn&#8217;t try to undermine the teaching of evolution in our schools; he doesn&#8217;t try to pack our Supreme Court so as to repeal Roe V. Wade; he&#8217;s not railing against stem-cell researchers; he appears not to give a damn about what gay people do in their bedrooms; and he has expressed no opinions on a host of issues from authoritarianism and militarism among conservative Christians to Britney Spears exposing her pathetic paw paw in public!  Why don&#8217;t you be a real follower of Jesus and follow his example?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobe38</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27015</link>
		<dc:creator>tobe38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-27015</guid>
		<description>Kirk Cameron said this in his introduction:

&lt;blockquote&gt;As a former atheist, myself, and evolutionist, I want to pull back the curtain and show that the number one reason many people do not believe in God is not because of a lack of evidence, but because of a theory that many scientists today consider to be a fairytale for grown-ups.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I found this hilarious.  The theory he is referring to is evolution, but if you listen again it&#039;s so ambiguous that if someone didn&#039;t know better, the &quot;scientists&quot; could be evolutionists and the &quot;fairy tale for grown-ups&quot; could be creationism.  Which would make him right - that is a big reason why a lot of people don&#039;t believe.  Own goal!

David S said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Also the RRS guys really really really need to work on appearance, tone, body language, etc. The facts are on their side–they can be positive and respectful and come across much better.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree.  Even just dressing up a bit more smartly would have made a better impression.  It&#039;s like a job interview - it should be all about your CV (resumee?), but you have to make an effort with presentation, appearance, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk Cameron said this in his introduction:</p>
<blockquote><p>As a former atheist, myself, and evolutionist, I want to pull back the curtain and show that the number one reason many people do not believe in God is not because of a lack of evidence, but because of a theory that many scientists today consider to be a fairytale for grown-ups.</p></blockquote>
<p>I found this hilarious.  The theory he is referring to is evolution, but if you listen again it&#8217;s so ambiguous that if someone didn&#8217;t know better, the &#8220;scientists&#8221; could be evolutionists and the &#8220;fairy tale for grown-ups&#8221; could be creationism.  Which would make him right &#8211; that is a big reason why a lot of people don&#8217;t believe.  Own goal!</p>
<p>David S said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Also the RRS guys really really really need to work on appearance, tone, body language, etc. The facts are on their side–they can be positive and respectful and come across much better.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  Even just dressing up a bit more smartly would have made a better impression.  It&#8217;s like a job interview &#8211; it should be all about your CV (resumee?), but you have to make an effort with presentation, appearance, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-26925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-26925</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Siamang said,

May 11, 2007 at 6:38 pm 

Michael J. Fox is the actor you’re thinking of, who suffers from Parkinson’s disease.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, thank you.  I wonder how he&#039;s doing currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Siamang said,</p>
<p>May 11, 2007 at 6:38 pm </p>
<p>Michael J. Fox is the actor you’re thinking of, who suffers from Parkinson’s disease.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, thank you.  I wonder how he&#8217;s doing currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-26924</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-26924</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why didn’t Brian and Kelly leave after Ray mentioned the Ten Commandments? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I propose they call a new debate.  They should say that they have absolute scientific proof that God does not exist and they&#039;ll tell this proof to the world if 20/20 does a live worldwide broadcast.

Then when the cameras are rolling they should get up and show a picture of the Mona Lisa.  

&quot;We know that the Mona Lisa had a creator, and his name was Leonardo da Vinci.  How do we know this?  It has a signature.  All the greatest works of art are signed by their creators.

&quot;How do we know that the world was not created by a god?  Because there is no signature ANYWHERE on the Earth.&quot;

At this point they should hold up a satellite photo of the earth.

&quot;Now SURELY, all the wonder of nature and all the beauty of life on earth would make it a FAR, FAR more wonderful work of art than the Mona Lisa.  Which makes it far, far more likely that anyone who created it would be proud enough to sign it.  And yet, we find NO SIGNATURE!  Look!  Look on this picture of the earth, can anyone find the word &#039;Yaweh&#039; written anywhere?  No!

&quot;Thus I have proven that either God doesn&#039;t exist, or He was too ashamed of his creation to actually sign it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why didn’t Brian and Kelly leave after Ray mentioned the Ten Commandments? </p></blockquote>
<p>I propose they call a new debate.  They should say that they have absolute scientific proof that God does not exist and they&#8217;ll tell this proof to the world if 20/20 does a live worldwide broadcast.</p>
<p>Then when the cameras are rolling they should get up and show a picture of the Mona Lisa.  </p>
<p>&#8220;We know that the Mona Lisa had a creator, and his name was Leonardo da Vinci.  How do we know this?  It has a signature.  All the greatest works of art are signed by their creators.</p>
<p>&#8220;How do we know that the world was not created by a god?  Because there is no signature ANYWHERE on the Earth.&#8221;</p>
<p>At this point they should hold up a satellite photo of the earth.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now SURELY, all the wonder of nature and all the beauty of life on earth would make it a FAR, FAR more wonderful work of art than the Mona Lisa.  Which makes it far, far more likely that anyone who created it would be proud enough to sign it.  And yet, we find NO SIGNATURE!  Look!  Look on this picture of the earth, can anyone find the word &#8216;Yaweh&#8217; written anywhere?  No!</p>
<p>&#8220;Thus I have proven that either God doesn&#8217;t exist, or He was too ashamed of his creation to actually sign it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-26923</link>
		<dc:creator>David S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/11/the-nightline-debate-videos/#comment-26923</guid>
		<description>If you see the unedited (or less edited) versions it&#039;s pretty clear that the broadcast version of the debate was edited to &quot;even out&quot; the debate for Ray and Kirk so they didn&#039;t come across as completely failing at the whole point of the debate (which was to prove god without using faith/bible).

Also the RRS guys really really really need to work on appearance, tone, body language, etc.  The facts are on their side--they can be positive and respectful and come across much better.

And hey, I made it onto Night Line again (for a fraction of a second).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you see the unedited (or less edited) versions it&#8217;s pretty clear that the broadcast version of the debate was edited to &#8220;even out&#8221; the debate for Ray and Kirk so they didn&#8217;t come across as completely failing at the whole point of the debate (which was to prove god without using faith/bible).</p>
<p>Also the RRS guys really really really need to work on appearance, tone, body language, etc.  The facts are on their side&#8211;they can be positive and respectful and come across much better.</p>
<p>And hey, I made it onto Night Line again (for a fraction of a second).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 379/383 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-26 06:40:02 -->
