<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christianity Today Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-123179</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 04:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-123179</guid>
		<description>A 2000+ year old book and its relevance and influence is as great as ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 2000+ year old book and its relevance and influence is as great as ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendlyAtheist</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30645</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendlyAtheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30645</guid>
		<description>Mriana-- I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re referring to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mriana&#8211; I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re referring to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30627</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30627</guid>
		<description>OK I just posted and it looks like someone was quoting me.  And here I thought people were practically quoting the whole darn thread.  That obviously is not a correct assumption.  Something is wrong.  :(  Maybe Hemant can fix it when he gets to the blog today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I just posted and it looks like someone was quoting me.  And here I thought people were practically quoting the whole darn thread.  That obviously is not a correct assumption.  Something is wrong.  <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Maybe Hemant can fix it when he gets to the blog today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30624</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30624</guid>
		<description>97%  somehow, I&#039;m skeptical about the poll.  I think it&#039;s skewed.  It&#039;s nice to see it, but I don&#039;t put much stoke in the percentage anymore.  Either the Rational Response Team has their people in on it too or many other similar groups, including those who participate on this blog are involved with skewing the results OR the more technicalogical countries (including the U.S.) are more Secular than we thought and the survey numbers the other people take are skewed.  In which case, the U.S. gov. should be taking more heat for mixing religion and politics, there by violating the 1st amend. BIG time and the country should be yelling more.  Therefore, IMHO, they can&#039;t both be right.  I take less stock in the 97% poll, even if it is rather nice to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>97%  somehow, I&#8217;m skeptical about the poll.  I think it&#8217;s skewed.  It&#8217;s nice to see it, but I don&#8217;t put much stoke in the percentage anymore.  Either the Rational Response Team has their people in on it too or many other similar groups, including those who participate on this blog are involved with skewing the results OR the more technicalogical countries (including the U.S.) are more Secular than we thought and the survey numbers the other people take are skewed.  In which case, the U.S. gov. should be taking more heat for mixing religion and politics, there by violating the 1st amend. BIG time and the country should be yelling more.  Therefore, IMHO, they can&#8217;t both be right.  I take less stock in the 97% poll, even if it is rather nice to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30496</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 07:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30496</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You simply must forgive us for getting excited when there’s evidence that there’s more of us “out there” than we thought.&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s also a pretty cool demonstration of memetics.  I&#039;ve been tracking the total votes count, and it&#039;s been growing exponentially with added spurts, as one would expect from spread via word-of-mouth with a few major social nodes (i.e., other bloggers) thrown in.

Today alone the total number of votes basically tripled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You simply must forgive us for getting excited when there’s evidence that there’s more of us “out there” than we thought.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a pretty cool demonstration of memetics.  I&#8217;ve been tracking the total votes count, and it&#8217;s been growing exponentially with added spurts, as one would expect from spread via word-of-mouth with a few major social nodes (i.e., other bloggers) thrown in.</p>
<p>Today alone the total number of votes basically tripled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliza</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30398</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 02:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30398</guid>
		<description>fred,
Sorry, could you elaborate please, what is the &quot;something&quot; you refer to in the first sentence?  Polls?  Polls presented by Christian media?  Christianity???

It&#039;s up to 97% saying &quot;rational&quot; now - sure, that&#039;s a sign that atheists/agnostics are flocking to answer this poll rather than any reflection of anything else.  

But we atheists/agnostics &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; belong to big groups (most of us), &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; get together once a week with our homies, &amp; we know that we are all too often viewed with suspicion, so that most of us are careful not to let others know IRL that we are atheists.  You simply must forgive us for getting excited when there&#039;s evidence that there&#039;s more of us &quot;out there&quot; than we thought.  It&#039;s liberating, and comforting, to finally feel some strength in numbers.  To feel, each of us, that we are not alone in this.

Fred, your using the term &quot;Christophobic&quot; for atheists-agnostics suggests to me that you haven&#039;t listened to atheists-agnostics, haven&#039;t &lt;em&gt;heard&lt;/em&gt; where we&#039;re coming from...and/or, that you know better than we do what we believe &amp; why.    Is that the case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fred,<br />
Sorry, could you elaborate please, what is the &#8220;something&#8221; you refer to in the first sentence?  Polls?  Polls presented by Christian media?  Christianity???</p>
<p>It&#8217;s up to 97% saying &#8220;rational&#8221; now &#8211; sure, that&#8217;s a sign that atheists/agnostics are flocking to answer this poll rather than any reflection of anything else.  </p>
<p>But we atheists/agnostics <em>don&#8217;t</em> belong to big groups (most of us), <em>don&#8217;t</em> get together once a week with our homies, &amp; we know that we are all too often viewed with suspicion, so that most of us are careful not to let others know IRL that we are atheists.  You simply must forgive us for getting excited when there&#8217;s evidence that there&#8217;s more of us &#8220;out there&#8221; than we thought.  It&#8217;s liberating, and comforting, to finally feel some strength in numbers.  To feel, each of us, that we are not alone in this.</p>
<p>Fred, your using the term &#8220;Christophobic&#8221; for atheists-agnostics suggests to me that you haven&#8217;t listened to atheists-agnostics, haven&#8217;t <em>heard</em> where we&#8217;re coming from&#8230;and/or, that you know better than we do what we believe &amp; why.    Is that the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30394</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-30394</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really funny that so many atheists are so concerned and put so much time and effort into something they don&#039;t even believe in. Christophobic is my word for it. Go for it if it helps you sleep. Maybe if you disbelieve strongly enough He will go away....yeah,right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really funny that so many atheists are so concerned and put so much time and effort into something they don&#8217;t even believe in. Christophobic is my word for it. Go for it if it helps you sleep. Maybe if you disbelieve strongly enough He will go away&#8230;.yeah,right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazzy Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-29777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzy Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-29777</guid>
		<description>Ultimately an atheist must believe that unintelligent matter/energy is self-existant and has always been.  A Christian believes this power resides in an intelligent being.  I ask which of these two positions is the most rational.

Also, nothing is a threat to the ultimate victory of being in Christ.  The spiritual victory has been won on the cross of Calvary.  Those who accept in faith the atonement that Jesus provided will have eternal life.  

What one believes or does not believe regarding this truth will have no bearing on what happens when one enters eternity.  All who have a backup position or primary position of resting in their own merit will be badly disappointed.  This includes many that profess to be followers of Christ, but are in fact trusting in their own efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately an atheist must believe that unintelligent matter/energy is self-existant and has always been.  A Christian believes this power resides in an intelligent being.  I ask which of these two positions is the most rational.</p>
<p>Also, nothing is a threat to the ultimate victory of being in Christ.  The spiritual victory has been won on the cross of Calvary.  Those who accept in faith the atonement that Jesus provided will have eternal life.  </p>
<p>What one believes or does not believe regarding this truth will have no bearing on what happens when one enters eternity.  All who have a backup position or primary position of resting in their own merit will be badly disappointed.  This includes many that profess to be followers of Christ, but are in fact trusting in their own efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; Christianity Today Says That Atheism Is the Only Rational Outlook!</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-29634</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; Christianity Today Says That Atheism Is the Only Rational Outlook!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-29634</guid>
		<description>[...] We won the polling! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We won the polling! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-29563</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/05/18/christianity-today-poll/#comment-29563</guid>
		<description>Although we all seem to be crammed in to Gary&#039;s post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although we all seem to be crammed in to Gary&#8217;s post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 305/313 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 04:13:29 -->
