<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PZ Myers&#8217; Response to Sam Harris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75741</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75741</guid>
		<description>Re: Stossel:
The problem with trying to import that study into this discussion is that the distinction was made between &quot;religious&quot; and &quot;non-religious&quot;.
I can&#039;t remember the exact stats, but don&#039;t something like 20% of Americans consider themselves &quot;non-religious&quot; but believe in god/the supernatural?
I&#039;m not saying a more nuanced study will produce different results, just that to consider it a characteristic of atheists you first have to separate atheists from other non-religious folk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Stossel:<br />
The problem with trying to import that study into this discussion is that the distinction was made between &#8220;religious&#8221; and &#8220;non-religious&#8221;.<br />
I can&#8217;t remember the exact stats, but don&#8217;t something like 20% of Americans consider themselves &#8220;non-religious&#8221; but believe in god/the supernatural?<br />
I&#8217;m not saying a more nuanced study will produce different results, just that to consider it a characteristic of atheists you first have to separate atheists from other non-religious folk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HappyNat</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75709</link>
		<dc:creator>HappyNat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75709</guid>
		<description>Batyah, Sorry I&#039;ve been away.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Happy Nat, why shouldn’t people be able to put their money toward the things they believe in? .&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I never said they should be able to spend their money on these things.  You asked why we have &#039;hostility&#039; towards believers.  They spending money on what I consider a waste pisses me off, I didn&#039;t say they should not be allowed.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Are you putting money toward promotion of gay marriage? &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Are you putting money toward the protection of the environment? &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes.

&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s a free country; you promote your own interests and everyone else promotes theirs. I don’t see the problem here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t see a problem here either, not sure why you think I do.  Part of it being a free country is that I can be hostile when I see people doing stupid things.

It is great you were able to &quot;pull yourself up by your bootstraps&quot;, this shows a lot of determination, desire, hard work, and luck.  Coming from that situation it seems you would realize that some people need help to overcome a difficult starting point in life.

I never said the money should go towards welfare or money should be handed out to these people.  You seem to take what I wrote and fill in whatever details you see fit.  

Many of the problems you mention could be helped through educatuion of how to get a job, manage money, stay away from addictions, use birth contol, and run a family/household. This is where I think money should be spent and where I give money in my local community.   This would seem a better solution than to hope the &quot;stop breeding&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batyah, Sorry I&#8217;ve been away.</p>
<blockquote><p>Happy Nat, why shouldn’t people be able to put their money toward the things they believe in? .</p></blockquote>
<p>I never said they should be able to spend their money on these things.  You asked why we have &#8216;hostility&#8217; towards believers.  They spending money on what I consider a waste pisses me off, I didn&#8217;t say they should not be allowed.</p>
<blockquote><p>Are you putting money toward promotion of gay marriage? </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.</p>
<blockquote><p>Are you putting money toward the protection of the environment? </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s a free country; you promote your own interests and everyone else promotes theirs. I don’t see the problem here.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t see a problem here either, not sure why you think I do.  Part of it being a free country is that I can be hostile when I see people doing stupid things.</p>
<p>It is great you were able to &#8220;pull yourself up by your bootstraps&#8221;, this shows a lot of determination, desire, hard work, and luck.  Coming from that situation it seems you would realize that some people need help to overcome a difficult starting point in life.</p>
<p>I never said the money should go towards welfare or money should be handed out to these people.  You seem to take what I wrote and fill in whatever details you see fit.  </p>
<p>Many of the problems you mention could be helped through educatuion of how to get a job, manage money, stay away from addictions, use birth contol, and run a family/household. This is where I think money should be spent and where I give money in my local community.   This would seem a better solution than to hope the &#8220;stop breeding&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; Sam Harris Responds to Sam Harris Responders</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75475</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; Sam Harris Responds to Sam Harris Responders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75475</guid>
		<description>[...] many atheists commented on Sam Harris&#8216; speech at the Atheist Alliance International convention [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many atheists commented on Sam Harris&#8216; speech at the Atheist Alliance International convention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75211</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75211</guid>
		<description>How did we go from titles to taking children from their mothers?  I don&#039;t think totalitarianism is the answer either.  I agree with Karen, you ideas Batyah are abhorrent.  :(  Frightening also.  Why don&#039;t you just slaughter these people too while you are ate it, but make it a slow painful death?  That&#039;s basically what you are suggesting and some people just might even commit suicide with your ideas, but what do you care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did we go from titles to taking children from their mothers?  I don&#8217;t think totalitarianism is the answer either.  I agree with Karen, you ideas Batyah are abhorrent.  <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Frightening also.  Why don&#8217;t you just slaughter these people too while you are ate it, but make it a slow painful death?  That&#8217;s basically what you are suggesting and some people just might even commit suicide with your ideas, but what do you care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75195</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-75195</guid>
		<description>Batyah, I regard your solutions as abhorrent. There&#039;s no other word for removing children from their families, forcibly sterilizing the poor and heaping additional suffering on the disenfranchised in society. Those are the nightmare scenarios of totalitarianism.

I&#039;m afraid we are too far apart in our thinking to have any viable discussion here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batyah, I regard your solutions as abhorrent. There&#8217;s no other word for removing children from their families, forcibly sterilizing the poor and heaping additional suffering on the disenfranchised in society. Those are the nightmare scenarios of totalitarianism.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid we are too far apart in our thinking to have any viable discussion here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batyah harris</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74979</link>
		<dc:creator>batyah harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74979</guid>
		<description>Karen, I agree with you that children should not be made to suffer. But my solutions would be regarded as too extreme and harsh: I believe that if you are old enough to make a baby, you are old enough to deal with consequences, period. That means that if you make a baby and cannot or will not take care of it, then the child should be seized immediately (no second chances; you were warned) and placed with people who will love it and nurture it.  Too bad if you feel bummed that your child was taken away. And if you dare to get yourself pregnant again, you face stiffer penalties -- I don&#039;t know, maybe forced sterilization.  At some point, the message has to be conveyed that children are precious and if you are unworthy of having them, we will take them away from you and give them to someone else. 

Handing out money to these kind of people does not help the situation at all. Many times these people do not use the money to feed or care for their children anyway -- instead I&#039;ve seen women support any number of able-bodied shiftless male sperm inseminators while their children continue to go neglected and hungry.  

Do not paint me as an uncaring, unsympathetic person. Nothing could be further from the truth. I get angry when I see children mistreated and neglected -- I do not care one whit if their parents were also mistreated and neglected.Once you reach a certain age, you should make the necessary changes in your life. At the very least, stop breeding.  It doesn&#039;t take much brainpower to look around you and figure out that you need to start doing things differently in order to change your life. It isn&#039;t as if the US isn&#039;t chock full of incredible role models. There are MANY resources in America already, and many wonderful and generous people. I know, because I took advantage of their offers of help.  It is not as though I did it all on my own, so I am not asking anyone else to do it all either. What I&#039;m asking is for everyone to BE RESPONSIBLE and put out even the tiniest of efforts.  MOST people you see in dire straits are there not because of discrimination or lack of brain power; they are there because they have no moral character. This is where the religious right is correct 100%.  Instead of giving handouts, start giving instructions (I agree that these people need to be led by the hand).  Have penalties for failure to follow instructions. Start taking the children away -- there are more than enough childless couples looking to adopt. 

There is an old adage that is so, so true:  Unrewarded behavior does not get repeated.  This is a psychological fact.  When public assistance is reduced for every additional child born, the birth rate in that region goes down.  DUH!  When men are chased down and forced to pay child support, they do. Many of these people live in circumstances that we consider horrific, but by THEIR standards, it&#039;s not so bad, so they are not motivated to change. THEREIN LIES THE PROBLEM. Where you see a problem and think the solution lies in easing suffering, I see a problem and think the solution lies in allowing the person to feel even more suffering. Clearly, they are not at their tipping point yet, that point at which they are motivated to say to themselves &quot;this isn&#039;t working for me; I need to do something different.&quot;  Obviously, as I have said before, the children should be removed from the home as they should not be made to suffer for their parents&#039; stupidity. If mass orphanages need to be built, so be it.  The breeding has got to stop, and the perpetuation of one welfare generation after the next must be broken.  

Liberals think they are so open hearted to want to give and give and give. But all that has done is create generations who have expectations that someone else will take care of them. It is wrong to hobble a person by making them believe that they are not capable of changing their lives for the better. Instead of sending victim creating messages like &quot;Life is so unfair; the rich get everything; discrimination is the big boogey man&quot; we should be sending messages of &quot;You can do it; you can be anything you want; others before you have done it and are waiting to help you and show you how.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen, I agree with you that children should not be made to suffer. But my solutions would be regarded as too extreme and harsh: I believe that if you are old enough to make a baby, you are old enough to deal with consequences, period. That means that if you make a baby and cannot or will not take care of it, then the child should be seized immediately (no second chances; you were warned) and placed with people who will love it and nurture it.  Too bad if you feel bummed that your child was taken away. And if you dare to get yourself pregnant again, you face stiffer penalties &#8212; I don&#8217;t know, maybe forced sterilization.  At some point, the message has to be conveyed that children are precious and if you are unworthy of having them, we will take them away from you and give them to someone else. </p>
<p>Handing out money to these kind of people does not help the situation at all. Many times these people do not use the money to feed or care for their children anyway &#8212; instead I&#8217;ve seen women support any number of able-bodied shiftless male sperm inseminators while their children continue to go neglected and hungry.  </p>
<p>Do not paint me as an uncaring, unsympathetic person. Nothing could be further from the truth. I get angry when I see children mistreated and neglected &#8212; I do not care one whit if their parents were also mistreated and neglected.Once you reach a certain age, you should make the necessary changes in your life. At the very least, stop breeding.  It doesn&#8217;t take much brainpower to look around you and figure out that you need to start doing things differently in order to change your life. It isn&#8217;t as if the US isn&#8217;t chock full of incredible role models. There are MANY resources in America already, and many wonderful and generous people. I know, because I took advantage of their offers of help.  It is not as though I did it all on my own, so I am not asking anyone else to do it all either. What I&#8217;m asking is for everyone to BE RESPONSIBLE and put out even the tiniest of efforts.  MOST people you see in dire straits are there not because of discrimination or lack of brain power; they are there because they have no moral character. This is where the religious right is correct 100%.  Instead of giving handouts, start giving instructions (I agree that these people need to be led by the hand).  Have penalties for failure to follow instructions. Start taking the children away &#8212; there are more than enough childless couples looking to adopt. </p>
<p>There is an old adage that is so, so true:  Unrewarded behavior does not get repeated.  This is a psychological fact.  When public assistance is reduced for every additional child born, the birth rate in that region goes down.  DUH!  When men are chased down and forced to pay child support, they do. Many of these people live in circumstances that we consider horrific, but by THEIR standards, it&#8217;s not so bad, so they are not motivated to change. THEREIN LIES THE PROBLEM. Where you see a problem and think the solution lies in easing suffering, I see a problem and think the solution lies in allowing the person to feel even more suffering. Clearly, they are not at their tipping point yet, that point at which they are motivated to say to themselves &#8220;this isn&#8217;t working for me; I need to do something different.&#8221;  Obviously, as I have said before, the children should be removed from the home as they should not be made to suffer for their parents&#8217; stupidity. If mass orphanages need to be built, so be it.  The breeding has got to stop, and the perpetuation of one welfare generation after the next must be broken.  </p>
<p>Liberals think they are so open hearted to want to give and give and give. But all that has done is create generations who have expectations that someone else will take care of them. It is wrong to hobble a person by making them believe that they are not capable of changing their lives for the better. Instead of sending victim creating messages like &#8220;Life is so unfair; the rich get everything; discrimination is the big boogey man&#8221; we should be sending messages of &#8220;You can do it; you can be anything you want; others before you have done it and are waiting to help you and show you how.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lippard</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lippard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74808</guid>
		<description>Re: Stossel:  I don&#039;t give money to Salvation Army because they proselytize Christianity.  I don&#039;t give money to United Way because they take a cut before passing it on and the branches in Arizona support organizations that violate their own (United Way&#039;s) nondiscrimination policy, such as the Boy Scouts of America, which discriminates against gays and atheists.  I don&#039;t think his test means much.

But there is evidence that conservatives and the religious are more generous with their own money than liberals and the non-religious, unfortunately, even if you don&#039;t count church donations:
http://lippard.blogspot.com/2006/12/charitable-giving-conservatives-vs.html
http://lippard.blogspot.com/2007/06/atheists-weak-on-charitable-giving.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Stossel:  I don&#8217;t give money to Salvation Army because they proselytize Christianity.  I don&#8217;t give money to United Way because they take a cut before passing it on and the branches in Arizona support organizations that violate their own (United Way&#8217;s) nondiscrimination policy, such as the Boy Scouts of America, which discriminates against gays and atheists.  I don&#8217;t think his test means much.</p>
<p>But there is evidence that conservatives and the religious are more generous with their own money than liberals and the non-religious, unfortunately, even if you don&#8217;t count church donations:<br />
<a href="http://lippard.blogspot.com/2006/12/charitable-giving-conservatives-vs.html" rel="nofollow">http://lippard.blogspot.com/2006/12/charitable-giving-conservatives-vs.html</a><br />
<a href="http://lippard.blogspot.com/2007/06/atheists-weak-on-charitable-giving.html" rel="nofollow">http://lippard.blogspot.com/2007/06/atheists-weak-on-charitable-giving.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74804</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74804</guid>
		<description>batyah, I&#039;m very glad that you were so resourceful, and responsible and smart enough to achieve what you did. Congratulations.

However, it&#039;s not very useful to look to one or two - or even two dozen - examples of extraordinary people overcoming the odds and becoming successful, because the truth is that most people simply can&#039;t do that. They don&#039;t have the brains, they don&#039;t have the drive, they don&#039;t have the optimism, or the luck, or whatever it takes to overcome as you did.

So, what are we as a society supposed to do with the vast numbers of people who don&#039;t fit your mold? Have you no empathy toward them whatsoever? Even you admit that your parents were irresponsible to let you go hungry in order to teach you a lesson or stick to their principles. Are we supposed to kick hungry children to the curb?

I for one do not want to live in a society where children beg on the streets and pregnant women have no access to supplemental food or income. Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>batyah, I&#8217;m very glad that you were so resourceful, and responsible and smart enough to achieve what you did. Congratulations.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s not very useful to look to one or two &#8211; or even two dozen &#8211; examples of extraordinary people overcoming the odds and becoming successful, because the truth is that most people simply can&#8217;t do that. They don&#8217;t have the brains, they don&#8217;t have the drive, they don&#8217;t have the optimism, or the luck, or whatever it takes to overcome as you did.</p>
<p>So, what are we as a society supposed to do with the vast numbers of people who don&#8217;t fit your mold? Have you no empathy toward them whatsoever? Even you admit that your parents were irresponsible to let you go hungry in order to teach you a lesson or stick to their principles. Are we supposed to kick hungry children to the curb?</p>
<p>I for one do not want to live in a society where children beg on the streets and pregnant women have no access to supplemental food or income. Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74800</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74800</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I trust the stats or not.  I give to WWF (we&#039;ve even adopted a wolf), ASPCA, and The Breast Cancer Assoc.  Now that isn&#039;t including the AHA, CSH, other Humanist organizations, ACLU, AU, Concerned Scientists, MoveOn, or Obama.  I don&#039;t donate blood though because I&#039;m 4&#039; 11&quot; and 100 lbs. (not liking needles is the very least of my excuses).

My point?  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to stereotype people or be all inclusive.  I do know some Christians who do not donate a single dime to charity OR their church, but I can actually say it&#039;s not fair to judge them because of that.  They are on disability and SSI.  In other words, they have no money.

Yeah, I just said that and about Christians too.  I can be nice to Christians sometimes.  I only criticize when it&#039;s deserved and there have been times I&#039;ve criticized atheists too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I trust the stats or not.  I give to WWF (we&#8217;ve even adopted a wolf), ASPCA, and The Breast Cancer Assoc.  Now that isn&#8217;t including the AHA, CSH, other Humanist organizations, ACLU, AU, Concerned Scientists, MoveOn, or Obama.  I don&#8217;t donate blood though because I&#8217;m 4&#8242; 11&#8243; and 100 lbs. (not liking needles is the very least of my excuses).</p>
<p>My point?  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to stereotype people or be all inclusive.  I do know some Christians who do not donate a single dime to charity OR their church, but I can actually say it&#8217;s not fair to judge them because of that.  They are on disability and SSI.  In other words, they have no money.</p>
<p>Yeah, I just said that and about Christians too.  I can be nice to Christians sometimes.  I only criticize when it&#8217;s deserved and there have been times I&#8217;ve criticized atheists too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batyah harris</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74787</link>
		<dc:creator>batyah harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/05/pz-myers-response-to-sam-harris/#comment-74787</guid>
		<description>Who gives to charity?

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2006/12/06/who_gives_to_charity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives to charity?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2006/12/06/who_gives_to_charity" rel="nofollow">http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2006/12/06/who_gives_to_charity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.053 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 384/388 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-26 23:06:00 -->
