<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evangelicals and Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77334</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77334</guid>
		<description>-Stephan
&lt;blockquote&gt;any kind of enlightening dialog.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s funny, I can remember you refusing to answer questions, constantly switching arguments, and throwing red herrings about. I think the record, it&#039;s all there to read, reflects unfavourably on you, and favourably on others. I would say that you&#039;re not interested in enlightening dialogue at all. I did actually read every word you have written here, I just disagreed, and I think I made a good, honest attempt to clearly explain what I disagree with. I also tried pretty hard to understand you, and gave you plenty of opportunities to explain yourself.

-Jen
&lt;blockquote&gt;From the man who JUST DOESN”T GET that women will always need abortions, and ignoring the fact that I, and other pro-choicers would love to reduce abortions- we just don’t think it is possible to get rid of forever and in every circumstance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Only for the mothers, it&#039;s surgery they might not need to go through. I would like birth control to be developed to be more effective, sex education to be taught, and for women to have equal rights and empowerment. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a scientific case for fetal pain, and I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any case at all for embryos and fetuses to be persons with rights.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/332/7546/909&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Can fetuses feel pain?&lt;/a&gt; by Stuart W G Derbyshire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-Stephan</p>
<blockquote><p>any kind of enlightening dialog.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s funny, I can remember you refusing to answer questions, constantly switching arguments, and throwing red herrings about. I think the record, it&#8217;s all there to read, reflects unfavourably on you, and favourably on others. I would say that you&#8217;re not interested in enlightening dialogue at all. I did actually read every word you have written here, I just disagreed, and I think I made a good, honest attempt to clearly explain what I disagree with. I also tried pretty hard to understand you, and gave you plenty of opportunities to explain yourself.</p>
<p>-Jen</p>
<blockquote><p>From the man who JUST DOESN”T GET that women will always need abortions, and ignoring the fact that I, and other pro-choicers would love to reduce abortions- we just don’t think it is possible to get rid of forever and in every circumstance.</p></blockquote>
<p>Only for the mothers, it&#8217;s surgery they might not need to go through. I would like birth control to be developed to be more effective, sex education to be taught, and for women to have equal rights and empowerment. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a scientific case for fetal pain, and I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any case at all for embryos and fetuses to be persons with rights.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/332/7546/909" rel="nofollow">Can fetuses feel pain?</a> by Stuart W G Derbyshire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77313</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ignoring things you don’t want to hear&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From the man who JUST DOESN&quot;T GET that women will always need abortions, and ignoring the fact that I, and other pro-choicers would love to reduce abortions- we just don&#039;t think it is possible to get rid of forever and in every circumstance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ignoring things you don’t want to hear</p></blockquote>
<p>From the man who JUST DOESN&#8221;T GET that women will always need abortions, and ignoring the fact that I, and other pro-choicers would love to reduce abortions- we just don&#8217;t think it is possible to get rid of forever and in every circumstance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77269</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77269</guid>
		<description>:roll:  Seems Stephan misses the point in favour of getting his view across and making us believe he is right.  He is refusing to see the other side of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' />   Seems Stephan misses the point in favour of getting his view across and making us believe he is right.  He is refusing to see the other side of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77253</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77253</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re all obviously well versed in demonizing your opponents, taking quotes out of context, ignoring things you don&#039;t want to hear, and generally refusing to engage in any kind of enlightening dialog.  I&#039;ll take my leave now and allow you to not listen to somebody else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re all obviously well versed in demonizing your opponents, taking quotes out of context, ignoring things you don&#8217;t want to hear, and generally refusing to engage in any kind of enlightening dialog.  I&#8217;ll take my leave now and allow you to not listen to somebody else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77251</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77251</guid>
		<description>Like campaigning against a certain vaccine that works against a virus that causes cancer? When they talk about responsibility, they&#039;re talking about punishment, that being going through a pregnancy then labour. I don&#039;t buy that anti-abortionists that aren&#039;t trying to outlaw abortions in rape cases or when the mother could be in danger are thinking for political gains, it&#039;s inconsistant with their skewed ethics. Isn&#039;t it telling that they talk about responsibility and abstinence instead of making a case against abortion itself?

-Stephen
&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe you know a few people with children that take care of, but the number of kids raised by 1 parent or a grandparent because neither parent wants them is staggering. It’s this “I can have sex with no strings attached” mentality that leads to broken homes and abortions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Abortion would be the solution to parents that don&#039;t want children. It doesn&#039;t lead to broken homes. This seems to be just a campaign against sex. I would say that it&#039;s a &quot;I can have children with no strings attached&quot; mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like campaigning against a certain vaccine that works against a virus that causes cancer? When they talk about responsibility, they&#8217;re talking about punishment, that being going through a pregnancy then labour. I don&#8217;t buy that anti-abortionists that aren&#8217;t trying to outlaw abortions in rape cases or when the mother could be in danger are thinking for political gains, it&#8217;s inconsistant with their skewed ethics. Isn&#8217;t it telling that they talk about responsibility and abstinence instead of making a case against abortion itself?</p>
<p>-Stephen</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe you know a few people with children that take care of, but the number of kids raised by 1 parent or a grandparent because neither parent wants them is staggering. It’s this “I can have sex with no strings attached” mentality that leads to broken homes and abortions.</p></blockquote>
<p>Abortion would be the solution to parents that don&#8217;t want children. It doesn&#8217;t lead to broken homes. This seems to be just a campaign against sex. I would say that it&#8217;s a &#8220;I can have children with no strings attached&#8221; mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77220</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  Monkeymind has a point..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  Monkeymind has a point..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeymind</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77219</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77219</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;this “I can have sex with no strings attached” mentality that leads to broken homes &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have never been able to understand the view that a child is punishment for having illicit sex or just for having a condom break. Really, you&#039;d think that having your nose fall off and your brains rot out from tertiary syphillis would be a much more effective deterrent to promiscuity. So why not outlaw treatment for VD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>this “I can have sex with no strings attached” mentality that leads to broken homes </p></blockquote>
<p>I have never been able to understand the view that a child is punishment for having illicit sex or just for having a condom break. Really, you&#8217;d think that having your nose fall off and your brains rot out from tertiary syphillis would be a much more effective deterrent to promiscuity. So why not outlaw treatment for VD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77198</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I see abortion not as a way of taking responsibility for your actions, but as a way of avoiding responsibility.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt; It’s a lack of taking responsibility.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is simply an untrue and offensive stereotype of ALL women who get abortions and I wish it would stop.  You just can&#039;t make blanket statements like that, Stephen.  What if it so happened that when I was married and using birth control that I had ended up pregnant, would you tell me, even though there would be a very high chance I could die and maybe the unborn child too, &quot;Oh you need to take responsibility&quot; and deny me an abortion that could potentially save my life so I could raise my other sons who weren&#039;t that husband&#039;s children, but the previous husband&#039;s who has not taken responsibility for them?  Or would you prefer they end up in an ophranage because my second ex wanted nothing to do with them?

See?  Your blanket judgement gets a bit ignorant in the view of complexity concerning human beings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I see abortion not as a way of taking responsibility for your actions, but as a way of avoiding responsibility.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> It’s a lack of taking responsibility.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is simply an untrue and offensive stereotype of ALL women who get abortions and I wish it would stop.  You just can&#8217;t make blanket statements like that, Stephen.  What if it so happened that when I was married and using birth control that I had ended up pregnant, would you tell me, even though there would be a very high chance I could die and maybe the unborn child too, &#8220;Oh you need to take responsibility&#8221; and deny me an abortion that could potentially save my life so I could raise my other sons who weren&#8217;t that husband&#8217;s children, but the previous husband&#8217;s who has not taken responsibility for them?  Or would you prefer they end up in an ophranage because my second ex wanted nothing to do with them?</p>
<p>See?  Your blanket judgement gets a bit ignorant in the view of complexity concerning human beings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77168</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77168</guid>
		<description>Jen, I agree that there will always be unwanted pregnancies, but that does not mean that abortion will always be necessary.  And I think reducing the number of abortions is a good goal for everyone, not just pro-lifers.  I don&#039;t think anyone would stand up and say that abortion is a good thing, other than maybe a few radicals feminists.  I see abortion not as a way of taking responsibility for your actions, but as a way of avoiding responsibility.

And I think illegitimacy matters because it is a symptom, like abortion, of a bigger problem.  Maybe you know a few people with children that take care of, but the number of kids raised by 1 parent or a grandparent because neither parent wants them is staggering.  It&#039;s this &quot;I can have sex with no strings attached&quot; mentality that leads to broken homes and abortions.  That attitude is one of the root causes of both of those symptoms.  It&#039;s a lack of taking responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen, I agree that there will always be unwanted pregnancies, but that does not mean that abortion will always be necessary.  And I think reducing the number of abortions is a good goal for everyone, not just pro-lifers.  I don&#8217;t think anyone would stand up and say that abortion is a good thing, other than maybe a few radicals feminists.  I see abortion not as a way of taking responsibility for your actions, but as a way of avoiding responsibility.</p>
<p>And I think illegitimacy matters because it is a symptom, like abortion, of a bigger problem.  Maybe you know a few people with children that take care of, but the number of kids raised by 1 parent or a grandparent because neither parent wants them is staggering.  It&#8217;s this &#8220;I can have sex with no strings attached&#8221; mentality that leads to broken homes and abortions.  That attitude is one of the root causes of both of those symptoms.  It&#8217;s a lack of taking responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77075</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/10/evangelicals-and-abortion/#comment-77075</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jen said,

October 13, 2007 at 8:19 pm 

Abortion will never be unnecessary, as long as birth control fails, women are unable to use or take birth control, women are in abusive relationships, and women just don’t want to have a baby for whatever reason. We can bring down the numbers with proper sex education, with social services and free birth control, but the number is never, ever going to be zero. Ever.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree, Jen.  Birth control is not 100%, not even tubal ligation. The only thing that is 100% is abstance or having one&#039;s uterus and/or overies removed.  There are even some women who cannot take birth control too as well as all the other things you pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jen said,</p>
<p>October 13, 2007 at 8:19 pm </p>
<p>Abortion will never be unnecessary, as long as birth control fails, women are unable to use or take birth control, women are in abusive relationships, and women just don’t want to have a baby for whatever reason. We can bring down the numbers with proper sex education, with social services and free birth control, but the number is never, ever going to be zero. Ever.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree, Jen.  Birth control is not 100%, not even tubal ligation. The only thing that is 100% is abstance or having one&#8217;s uterus and/or overies removed.  There are even some women who cannot take birth control too as well as all the other things you pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 305/313 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 02:54:43 -->
