<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions for Scott Adams, Creator of Dilbert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-298481</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-298481</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that when Scott Adams talks, his tongue is firmly in his cheek! Most of it is not meant to be believed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that when Scott Adams talks, his tongue is firmly in his cheek! Most of it is not meant to be believed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDeadEye</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-183254</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDeadEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-183254</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I prefer the Scott Adams of Adventure International fame.  

\SAY YOHO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I prefer the Scott Adams of Adventure International fame.  </p>
<p>\SAY YOHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimalkin</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-182603</link>
		<dc:creator>Grimalkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-182603</guid>
		<description>I loved the Dilbert comic for years and would eagerly look forward to visiting my dad every other weekend because, among many other awesome things my dad did, he always saved the funnies from the Herald Tribune for me (not to mention the weekly Dave Barry, which rocked). 

A few months ago, a friend told me that he had a really funny blog as well. So I checked that out and I enjoyed it for quite a while. Then he made a post that essentially joked about rape. This was back when the girl in one of the private subcontracted companies in Iraq claimed to have been raped by several of her coworkers and then kept locked up. Adams made light of it and essentially said that this would be completely impossible and that she was obviously lying (forgive me if my memory is crackling, I&#039;m pretty sure it was something to this effect). 

That was that. Not only is it completely not funny, it&#039;s also just not true. That&#039;s when MY bullshit meter started going off. I had no interest in a Scott Adams who would stand up on his soapbox and lecture about things he knew nothing about as though he were some sort of authority. 

And while it is usually my policy to separate art from artist, I just haven&#039;t been able to enjoy Dilbert since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Dilbert comic for years and would eagerly look forward to visiting my dad every other weekend because, among many other awesome things my dad did, he always saved the funnies from the Herald Tribune for me (not to mention the weekly Dave Barry, which rocked). </p>
<p>A few months ago, a friend told me that he had a really funny blog as well. So I checked that out and I enjoyed it for quite a while. Then he made a post that essentially joked about rape. This was back when the girl in one of the private subcontracted companies in Iraq claimed to have been raped by several of her coworkers and then kept locked up. Adams made light of it and essentially said that this would be completely impossible and that she was obviously lying (forgive me if my memory is crackling, I&#8217;m pretty sure it was something to this effect). </p>
<p>That was that. Not only is it completely not funny, it&#8217;s also just not true. That&#8217;s when MY bullshit meter started going off. I had no interest in a Scott Adams who would stand up on his soapbox and lecture about things he knew nothing about as though he were some sort of authority. </p>
<p>And while it is usually my policy to separate art from artist, I just haven&#8217;t been able to enjoy Dilbert since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; In Case You Need Some Reading Material&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-182507</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; In Case You Need Some Reading Material&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-182507</guid>
		<description>[...] isn&#8217;t anything new. In fact, some of you have brought it up before (and thanks to Krista for reminding me about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t anything new. In fact, some of you have brought it up before (and thanks to Krista for reminding me about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-82494</link>
		<dc:creator>stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-82494</guid>
		<description>Anyone read Adams&#039; e-book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andrewsmcmeel.com/godsdebris/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;God&#039;s Debris&quot;? &lt;/a&gt;I read it a few years ago and rather enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone read Adams&#8217; e-book <a href="http://www.andrewsmcmeel.com/godsdebris/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;God&#8217;s Debris&#8221;? </a>I read it a few years ago and rather enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; Scott Adams on PZ Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-82029</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; Scott Adams on PZ Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-82029</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, answered readers&#8217; questions on the Freakonomics blog. Here are a couple of the exchanges:  Q: I’m interested in your comments on evolution. If you have read PZ Myer’s deconstruction of your opinions on evolution, I think they point out not only your misconceptions, but also those of a large number of people unfamiliar with theory. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, answered readers&#8217; questions on the Freakonomics blog. Here are a couple of the exchanges:  Q: I’m interested in your comments on evolution. If you have read PZ Myer’s deconstruction of your opinions on evolution, I think they point out not only your misconceptions, but also those of a large number of people unfamiliar with theory. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81496</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81496</guid>
		<description>Mr. Adams is probably bullshitting with what he says, but if he&#039;s not, then I think his bullshitometer needs a calibration or a software update.  Doubting everything that&#039;s counterintuitive is probably a prudent response most of the time, but when you&#039;re an ignoramus on a particular subject, it&#039;s wise not to spew on about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Adams is probably bullshitting with what he says, but if he&#8217;s not, then I think his bullshitometer needs a calibration or a software update.  Doubting everything that&#8217;s counterintuitive is probably a prudent response most of the time, but when you&#8217;re an ignoramus on a particular subject, it&#8217;s wise not to spew on about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Malone</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81480</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81480</guid>
		<description>I recommend Steven Dutch&#039;s lengthy response to Scott Adams, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/ScottAdams.HTM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Suckered by Intelligent Design&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend Steven Dutch&#8217;s lengthy response to Scott Adams, &#8220;<a href="http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/ScottAdams.HTM" rel="nofollow">Suckered by Intelligent Design</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadren</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81390</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81390</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Doesn&#039;t this mean that Adams is an atheist? What other ideas are there about biodiversity aside from creationism and natural selection?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From what I&#039;ve read of his &quot;serious&quot; writings, I&#039;m afraid he doesn&#039;t really have an alternative explanation, but rather a sort of &quot;anything goes&quot; attitude to science.  His talk of the double-slit experiment,  affirmations, and psychics leads me to believe that he takes a sort of &quot;What the Bleep&quot; attitude to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Doesn&#8217;t this mean that Adams is an atheist? What other ideas are there about biodiversity aside from creationism and natural selection?</p></blockquote>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve read of his &#8220;serious&#8221; writings, I&#8217;m afraid he doesn&#8217;t really have an alternative explanation, but rather a sort of &#8220;anything goes&#8221; attitude to science.  His talk of the double-slit experiment,  affirmations, and psychics leads me to believe that he takes a sort of &#8220;What the Bleep&#8221; attitude to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stogoe</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81382</link>
		<dc:creator>stogoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/10/27/questions-for-scott-adams-creator-of-dilbert/#comment-81382</guid>
		<description>The worst part about Scott Adams isn&#039;t that he&#039;s a giant pile of Suck.  No, it&#039;s his legion of toadying fanboys who mob sites that criticize The Great Scott Adams and scream that &quot;Oh, he&#039;s just joking!  It&#039;s a joke!  You don&#039;t understand the joke! Waaah!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst part about Scott Adams isn&#8217;t that he&#8217;s a giant pile of Suck.  No, it&#8217;s his legion of toadying fanboys who mob sites that criticize The Great Scott Adams and scream that &#8220;Oh, he&#8217;s just joking!  It&#8217;s a joke!  You don&#8217;t understand the joke! Waaah!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 301/309 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 13:09:43 -->
