<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NoMasterCard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96872</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96872</guid>
		<description>You shouldn&#039;t have a problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t have a problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godma</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96517</link>
		<dc:creator>godma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96517</guid>
		<description>I think the text is badly written, but that the intention behind it would actually forbid our red A.

I agree with the other commenters that atheism (well, &lt;em&gt;explicit&lt;/em&gt; atheism) is actually a religious view/opinion (although not a belief), since it is a view about religion.

However, as I read it, this is not technically what the text forbids.  What&#039;s forbidden are the views/opinions/beliefs &lt;strong&gt;of&lt;/strong&gt; political or religious groups.  We are not a political or religious group, although there are political groups out there that advocate our views.

However, this is badly written, and probably not what they attended, because it is too loose.  This would include &lt;strong&gt;any&lt;/strong&gt; opinion held by a political or religious group, even those that are incidental.  For example, modern catholics believe that the Earth is round.  Does that mean that a picture of a round Earth is forbidden?  Obviously not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the text is badly written, but that the intention behind it would actually forbid our red A.</p>
<p>I agree with the other commenters that atheism (well, <em>explicit</em> atheism) is actually a religious view/opinion (although not a belief), since it is a view about religion.</p>
<p>However, as I read it, this is not technically what the text forbids.  What&#8217;s forbidden are the views/opinions/beliefs <strong>of</strong> political or religious groups.  We are not a political or religious group, although there are political groups out there that advocate our views.</p>
<p>However, this is badly written, and probably not what they attended, because it is too loose.  This would include <strong>any</strong> opinion held by a political or religious group, even those that are incidental.  For example, modern catholics believe that the Earth is round.  Does that mean that a picture of a round Earth is forbidden?  Obviously not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercredi</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercredi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96483</guid>
		<description>Eh, I think that&#039;s a bad argument. One could easily argue that atheism is a religious position - specifically, the belief in the nonexistence of gods. (After all, we cannot prove the nonexistence of YWH, Zeus, and the Invisible Pink Unicorn.) 

Whether atheism is defined as a lack of belief or a belief of a lack is something I don&#039;t expect all self-identified atheists to agree on, but it does mean it&#039;s IMO a tad disingenuous to argue on a technicality like that. 

That said, I don&#039;t think the A card is necessarily in violation of the site&#039;s T&amp;C in spirit, unless the site creators intend to prohibit people from putting symbols of religions on the card. (Looking at the premade cards they display, I&#039;m not sure. The Easter and Christmas cards have only the more secular symbols of those holidays, but the Hannuka cards have menorahs.) I&#039;m reading the intent as &quot;we don&#039;t want the can of worms that is deciding which religious/political beliefs and messages are acceptable.&quot;

 Displaying the A on a blog or wearing it on a T-shirt is pretty much akin to wearing a cross or Star of David - they&#039;re all ways to signal &quot;I belong to this  group.&quot; So the safest thing to do would be to ask if a symbol of religious or political membership is permitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I think that&#8217;s a bad argument. One could easily argue that atheism is a religious position &#8211; specifically, the belief in the nonexistence of gods. (After all, we cannot prove the nonexistence of YWH, Zeus, and the Invisible Pink Unicorn.) </p>
<p>Whether atheism is defined as a lack of belief or a belief of a lack is something I don&#8217;t expect all self-identified atheists to agree on, but it does mean it&#8217;s IMO a tad disingenuous to argue on a technicality like that. </p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think the A card is necessarily in violation of the site&#8217;s T&amp;C in spirit, unless the site creators intend to prohibit people from putting symbols of religions on the card. (Looking at the premade cards they display, I&#8217;m not sure. The Easter and Christmas cards have only the more secular symbols of those holidays, but the Hannuka cards have menorahs.) I&#8217;m reading the intent as &#8220;we don&#8217;t want the can of worms that is deciding which religious/political beliefs and messages are acceptable.&#8221;</p>
<p> Displaying the A on a blog or wearing it on a T-shirt is pretty much akin to wearing a cross or Star of David &#8211; they&#8217;re all ways to signal &#8220;I belong to this  group.&#8221; So the safest thing to do would be to ask if a symbol of religious or political membership is permitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stogoe</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96476</link>
		<dc:creator>stogoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96476</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t I hear that the OUT Campaign was relaxing their copyright(trademark?) so lots of people could use it and get it spread all around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t I hear that the OUT Campaign was relaxing their copyright(trademark?) so lots of people could use it and get it spread all around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatoly</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96468</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96468</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I generally tend to be very open about my [lack of] beliefs but this... I&#039;m really not in the mood of having a religious discussion every time I pay at the cash register.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I generally tend to be very open about my [lack of] beliefs but this&#8230; I&#8217;m really not in the mood of having a religious discussion every time I pay at the cash register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96347</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/29/nomastercard/#comment-96347</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However, taking this literally atheism is neither a political or religious opinion or belief, rather it is a lack of belief. So TECHNICALLY we are covered. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hmm.  The lawyer in me is bubbling up. (he resides in my evil side)  Atheism is a lack of religion but it also could be said to be an opinion &lt;em&gt;about&lt;/em&gt; religion and therefore a &quot;religious opinion,&quot; so there might be a viable objection.  

However until if and when that happens, go for it.  It&#039;ll be one of the few times  anybody gives atheists any credit.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, taking this literally atheism is neither a political or religious opinion or belief, rather it is a lack of belief. So TECHNICALLY we are covered. </p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm.  The lawyer in me is bubbling up. (he resides in my evil side)  Atheism is a lack of religion but it also could be said to be an opinion <em>about</em> religion and therefore a &#8220;religious opinion,&#8221; so there might be a viable objection.  </p>
<p>However until if and when that happens, go for it.  It&#8217;ll be one of the few times  anybody gives atheists any credit.  <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 249/257 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 01:24:06 -->
